ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPRSS: RRY030 Astrophysics and Earth Science Sp2, 09/10

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-12-17 - 2010-01-25
Antal svar: 4
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Arto Heikkilä»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

3 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 66%
Around 20 hours/week»1 33%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.33

- Dropped out of the course early.» (?)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

4 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 25%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 50%
100%»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- I started on the course, but found the earth science part so lousy i dropped out of the course after three weeks. The lecturer is definitely the worst lecturer I"ve come across at Chalmers. His lectures were just full of equations, which he never explained the use for. A total lack of good structure and no ability to create interest in his subject.» (25%)
- unfortunately I couldn"t attend the astrophysicspart on thursdays, because it collided with my other course. I liked the astrophysicspart, but for me my other course was more important.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

4 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 50%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 25%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 25%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.75

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

3 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 33%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»2 66%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.66

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

4 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 50%
Yes, definitely»0 0%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»2 50%
Some extent»1 25%
Large extent»1 25%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.75

- See question 2. The astrophysics part was good, the earth science was useless.» (Small extent)
- Hans-Georg"s lectures are unfortunately often hard to understand. He can be a bit unorganized, often scribbling all over the board back and forth, changing things and not explaining what he"s doing.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

3 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 100%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Good book on Astrophysics. It however feels unreasonable having to buy 3 books for a 7.5 p course. I don"t think anyone bought the two books for the Earth Science part. I"m not really sure what a good solution would be.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

3 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 33%
Rather well»2 66%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

3 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 33%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»1 33%
I did not seek help»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

3 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 33%
Rather well»1 33%
Very well»1 33%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- I missed the es-course no.2, where we were splitted up into groups, and to find a group was not that easy. but it could be easier, if the names were written down, i.e. who is in which group.» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

3 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 100%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

12. How was the total workload this study period?

3 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
High»3 100%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- It was very high with due to my other course (not mprss)» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

4 svarande

Poor»1 25%
Fair»2 50%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»1 25%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- The earth science part needs lots of changes.» (Poor)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The Astrophysics»
- ES: group work/home work»
- Astrophysics is very interesting and Magnus is a great lecturer, very helpful and taking time to explain things in detail. Hans-Georg"s subject matter did not really captivate me but he did a great job with marking up the homeworks, giving each student personal feedback. The InSAR project was interesting.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The lecturer in earth science»
- ES: more organized please, e.g. right from the beginning a list with the groupmembers»
- The Earth Science lectures about plate tectonics and stress don"t give much lasting value to the vast majority of students I think. I believe it would be more worthwhile to spend a larger amount of time on climate questions since that"s very relevant at the moment. Either that or give a more "basic" introduction to plate tectonics and other geophysical ideas.»

16. Additional comments

Kursutvärderingssystem från