Visa resultat

Entrepreneurial leadership and dynamic organizing 1, CIP046, CIP046

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

10 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»		7		70%
Around 20 hours/week»		3		30%
Around 25 hours/week»		0		0%
Around 30 hours/week»		0		0%
At least 35 hours/week»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.3

- well.. 3,5hp under a whole semester, how much do you expect» (At most 15 hours/week)
- The time spent was fluctuating depending on the different assignments. » (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

0%»		0		0%
25%»		0		0%
50%»		0		0%
75%»		4		40%
100%»		6		60%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

- Missed one class during the semester» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

I have not seen/read the goals»		0		0%
The goals are difficult to understand»		0		0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»		5		50%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»		5		50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Karen explained it better in an e-mail later on » (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»		0		0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»		9		90%
No, the goals are set too high»		1		10%

Genomsnitt: 2.1

- Very much to do for a course with only 3.5 credits » (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

No, not at all»		0		0%
To some extent»		7		70%
Yes, definitely»		2		20%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»		1		10%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- I am refreeing to the ELDO lab report» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		1		10%
Some extent»		4		40%
Large extent»		4		40%
Great extent»		1		10%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- Some of the lectures have been really good, especially the external ones. The internal ones could improve, maybe a bit more enthusiastic and engaging lectures would be good.» (Some extent)
- Fleming is not a good lecturer. Karen is great!» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		3		30%
Some extent»		3		30%
Large extent»		3		30%
Great extent»		1		10%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

- I have not read any of the course litterature» (Small extent)
- I was reading a lot of articles during the work with the lab report, some where good.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

Very badly»		1		10%
Rather badly»		2		20%
Rather well»		7		70%
Very well»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- must start utilizing a web portal. its ridiculous to work by e-mail in 2009.» (Rather badly)
- The information was spread out often at different times through emails. It was sometimes hard to get the latest version of the task as some emails had different subjects and so on, a course homepage would be really recommendable.» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

Very poor»		0		0%
Rather poor»		0		0%
Rather good»		1		10%
Very good»		9		90%
I did not seek help»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- Karen is always happy to help and quick with answers.» (Very good)
- Karen always has time to answer questions» (Very good)
- Almost always reachable on the phone, very good.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

Very poorly»		0		0%
Rather poorly»		0		0%
Rather well»		2		20%
Very well»		8		80%
I did not seek cooperation»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

11. How was the course workload?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		6		60%
High»		4		40%
Too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- High during the worst periods of the course, maybe the reflection hand-in could be handed in either earlier or later.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		1		10%
High»		3		30%
Too high»		6		60%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- It could be very good if distributed better according to the parallel courses.» (Adequate)
- four courses and one project at full speed.» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

Poor»		0		0%
Fair»		1		10%
Adequate»		1		10%
Good»		7		70%
Excellent»		1		10%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- Well it feels like somewhat of a fluffy course and it has not been prioritized the highest as it often had a more far-fetched conection to the project.» (Adequate)
- It is good since it provides learnings in the soft areas, which is not really touched upon through the other courses.» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

16. Additional comments