ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Nordic Master 2009 SJO245 Classification and Regulation, SJO245

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-12-14 - 2009-12-23
Antal svar: 9
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 52%
Kontaktperson: Magda Wilewska-Bien»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

9 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 55%
Around 20 hours/week»3 33%
Around 25 hours/week»1 11%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.55

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

9 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 22%
100%»7 77%

Genomsnitt: 4.77

- Overlapping of my courses» (75%)
- There was some overlap by teachers/guest lectures that could have been avoided» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

9 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 11%
The goals are difficult to understand»3 33%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 55%

Genomsnitt: 3

- It would have been nice to get at better picture of the assignment. I thought it should be very very detailed but it wasn"t that difficulr actually. But it would have been good to know that in advance.» (The goals are difficult to understand)
- Very good course that clearly states what is expected of you.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»6 66%
No, the goals are set too high»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- After the assignment this became clear... Before I thought the goals were too high regarding the lectures and then the assignment.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all»1 11%
To some extent»3 33%
Yes, definitely»5 55%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.44

- As above: the assignment was easier that first thought...» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»3 33%
Some extent»2 22%
Large extent»3 33%
Great extent»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.22

- The lectures didn"t cover the questions and/or assignment so much.» (Some extent)
- would have liked more guidance in how to make a survey plan. » (Large extent)

7. To what extend has the lecture hold by Arnaud Mens, Bureau Veritas, 19th of November been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extend»0 0%
Some extend»6 66%
Large extend»2 22%
Great extend»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.44

- The presentation was good and useful» (Some extend)
- talks to fast.» (Some extend)
- Very good to understand the topic in general.» (Great extend)

8. To what extend has the lecture hold by Mathias Nestorson, DNV, 20th of November been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extend»0 0%
Some extend»3 37%
Large extend»4 50%
Great extend»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- I wasn"t there...» (?)
- The presentataion was good and useful» (Some extend)

9. To what extend has the lecture hold by Ronnie Hanzen, Swedish transport agency, 20th of November been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extend»1 11%
Some extend»4 44%
Large extend»1 11%
Great extend»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- Also a good overall picture. » (Some extend)
- excellent!» (Great extend)

10. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»1 11%
Some extent»4 44%
Large extent»2 22%
Great extent»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 2.55

- There should be a book or a compendium.» (Small extent)
- again. Survey planning was very difficult as we did not have any background for this. More guidance required.» (Some extent)

11. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

9 svarande

Very badly»1 11%
Rather badly»2 22%
Rather well»3 33%
Very well»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

- Once one get used to PingPong it is a useful tool. The logbook was good once it worked.» (Very well)

Study climate

12. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

9 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 11%
Rather good»2 22%
Very good»6 66%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- teacher helpful, but not always available.» (Rather poor)
- Good availability via PingPong and also the mails were answered quickly.» (Very good)
- Sami Has been very helpfull. He was realy involved and cared when I hand any question about the course or the tasks. » (Very good)

13. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

9 svarande

Very poorly»1 11%
Rather poorly»1 11%
Rather well»4 44%
Very well»3 33%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

14. How was the course workload?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 11%
Adequate»5 55%
High»3 33%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

- Because we approached the assignment too detailed. One had to learn from scratch.» (High)

15. How was the total workload this study period?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 11%
Adequate»2 22%
High»5 55%
Too high»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

Summarizing questions

16. What is your general impression of the course?

9 svarande

Poor»1 11%
Fair»1 11%
Adequate»2 22%
Good»4 44%
Excellent»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- It was a pity that I did understand the course as a very detailed one. I thought that only engineers would be able to understand each aspect, but so wasn"t the case once we presented. » (Adequate)
- good course and good external lectures (DNV etc.) » (Good)

17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The questions we had to answer every week, they were very useful»
- The tasks,the guest lecturers»
- The external lecturers, especially Mr Hanzen.»
- guest lecturers»
- More lectures with Sami regarding survey.»

18. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Nothing as i see it»
- The survey plan which we preseneted for the teacher/class should have been started earlier in the course with more back up. Oure presentations in general was not too good »
- ? Maybe more guidance and help in making survey plan.»
- more lectures in order to answer and discuss the questions properly»

19. Additional comments

- I think as a whole the course was interesting and the set up was very good»
- The course was very good »

Kursutvärderingssystem från