ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Kursutvärdering Turbulent Flow, MTF256

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2007-12-03 - 2008-01-30
Antal svar: 12
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 48%
Kontaktperson: Abolfazl Shiri»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

12 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 16%
Around 20 hours/week»2 16%
Around 25 hours/week»7 58%
Around 30 hours/week»1 8%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.58

- Pretty hard to study this course, mainly because of the lack of excercises» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

12 svarande

0%»1 8%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»11 91%

Genomsnitt: 4.66

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 27%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 9%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 45%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.54

- I didn"t know that there would be so much statistics envolved in the course. This was both a good and bad surprise.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- ???» (?)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

10 svarande

No, not at all»2 20%
To some extent»4 40%
Yes, definitely»2 20%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- I think it"s better with an exam where you write your own answers. In that way you avoid misunderstandings.» (No, not at all)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 36%
Large extent»2 18%
Great extent»5 45%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

- It was sometimes hard to understand the lectures and why the teacher was talking about something. It is good to give a background and a reason for a long mathematical deriving. Sometimes I read the lecture notes before the lecture and then I could understand better, but almost always the lecture notes were not handed out until after the lecture.» (Some extent)
- Bill Georg is a great teacher, who understands to motivate the students to think themself. The lectures never got boring. » (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 18%
Large extent»6 54%
Great extent»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

- Notes taken by the student during the lecture + given course literature is necessary to be able to study for the exam. You cannot "survive" without having taken good lecture notes. » (Large extent)
- The project with jet, wake, plume was a very good way to understand the similarity theory.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 18%
Rather well»7 63%
Very well»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3

- It should be clear from the beginning of the course which assignments and labs one has to do in the course. We always got to know only one week ahead when we were suppose to do a project or a lab and that makes it very hard to plan the time together with another course.» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 9%
Very good»10 90%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- Honors to Farzard. » (Very good)
- I always got help when I needed. And Farzad gave very good help during the project time.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 9%
Rather well»6 54%
Very well»4 36%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

11. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 9%
Adequate»9 81%
High»1 9%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- It was to high at the end of the course» (Adequate)
- In the beginning of the course it was hard to know what to do as there were no lecture notes and no tasks. But at the end the workload got very high, especially with the project. It would have been better if we had got the project earlier.» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 45%
High»5 45%
Too high»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»1 9%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»4 36%
Good»4 36%
Excellent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

- A lot of errors were made during lectures. I dont know if this was on purpose or not, but it really was an irration. The course would have given me a lot more if I could trust what was said during lectures. I know that we are supposed to question everything and I always do, but what was questioned in this course, by the student, wasn"t quite what was expected. The question should not be "is this correct?" but rather, "why is it this way?" or "can it be done in some other way?"... I see the point in finding errors, but there were to many of them. » (Poor)
- It the beginning of the course I found it hard to see what the course was really about, but it got better every week and at the end I really enjoyed the lectures.» (Good)
- It is a shame that I had to give up this course. I can only recommend it to everybody. » (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Doing an experiment really helps understanding some of the (rather complicated)theory»
- The project was really good and it gave me a lot of understanding.»
- exercises exam format»
- The experiment. But maybe it should be more clear what you have to do for the report. »
- bill»
- The project (jet, wake, plume), but they will need more time.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- A better organization of the homework: clearer instructions and not everything in the last 2 weeks but evenly distributed over the course»
- The project should be given a couple of weeks earlier since there were a few points that could be made realively early in the course.»
- may be there should be a bit more exercises and tutorials, practical tasks»
- Ask students to submit the experiment report individually, not as a group.»
- More information »
- Give a clear course description and tell which assignments that are included in the course. Then people are probably more secure in the beginning.»

16. Additional comments

- Every single lecture was excellent and inspiring. Thanks a lot!!»
- Bill is an impressive lecturer, but a better structure during lectures is required for this course to be good. Please tell the students what the lecture is going to contain before start and what the goal is and its pupose. There were quite a lot of errors in the lecture notes, but I guess you know that...»

Kursutvärderingssystem från