Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

engineering metals advanced course, MMK231

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2007-12-03 - 2007-12-12
Antal svar: 17
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 65%
Kontaktperson: Lars Nyborg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

17 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 11%
Around 20 hours/week»5 29%
Around 25 hours/week»6 35%
Around 30 hours/week»4 23%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.7

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

17 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»2 11%
50%»0 0%
75%»4 23%
100%»11 64%

Genomsnitt: 4.41

- Only attended the first 2-3 weeks of lectures» (25%)
- Good lectures, inspirering teacher» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

16 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 12%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 31%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»9 56%

Genomsnitt: 3.31

- I don"t remember» (?)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

14 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 7%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»12 85%
No, the goals are set too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

16 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»7 43%
Yes, definitely»6 37%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- I didn"t write the exam.» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 17%
Large extent»10 58%
Great extent»4 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»2 12%
Some extent»6 37%
Large extent»5 31%
Great extent»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.56

- the lecture slides helped but the book online was not fun at all to read so i skipped that» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

17 svarande

Very badly»1 5%
Rather badly»1 5%
Rather well»9 52%
Very well»6 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.17

- viktigt att allt material distribueras på samma sätt, dvs på studieportalen. » (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

17 svarande

Very poor»1 5%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 17%
Very good»11 64%
I did not seek help»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

- Lars svarar på alla frågor!» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

17 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 5%
Rather well»9 52%
Very well»7 41%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

11. How was the course workload?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 12%
Adequate»9 56%
High»5 31%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

- Not much consideration was taken to students from different background than material engineers. You cant just take for granted that those students with another background know the meaning of all the technical terms and theory that was introduced. To be honest most of it was new, so I had no chance to follow the lectures well.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

17 svarande

Too low»2 11%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»8 47%
High»6 35%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

17 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 5%
Adequate»4 23%
Good»11 64%
Excellent»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- In general I think that it has been a good course»
- The tool steel heat treatment practicals. The exercises are useful for understanding too.»
- The practical classes»
- The adjunct proffesor who taught Stainless Steel was so well-read, knowledgable and articulate. Maybe you can invite him over more and make better use of him.»
- Practical classes and the project.»
- The guestlecture about stainless steels»
- all»
- Lab»
- The same way with clearer ending!»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- course book. It was difficult to find the literature on the web.»
- I think that the heat treatment exercises were really interesting, but it should be nice to spend more time in class and discuss them in small groups but also in a common class. »
- It would be appreciable if there were less classes two weeks before exams :)»
- Practical classes should be more practical than theoritical. Some labs need to be added to this course in order for it to provide students with a hands-on experience on what they study.»
- Better information for students from different background. In my opinion, one should AT LEAST suggest a introductory/basic textbook that covers most of the material that is needed to follow the course. Just refering to ASM isnt going to work, its too time consuming to look up every little thing you havent heard of before and at the same time try to keep up with the 2 courses...»
- Övningarna vi fick utdelat. Borde kunna göras mer nyttigare. Vad för frågor kan man ställas inför som materialexpert.»
- nothing»
- four hours it is too long»
- Examination was totally fair but unexpectable in comparison with those we studied during Quarter. Students should have the awareness on examination in advanced much much clearer than what we had.»
- nothing comes to mind»

16. Additional comments

- none»
- I think the Oxidation part should be removed from the course content. Since it is a rough subject dealing mainly with kinetics and thermodynamics, it requires more time and concentration and could be a seperated subject in other courses like thermodynamic or corrosion. In my opinion, when it comes to the oxidation of metals, to let students know only about Elingham-Richardson diagram and its application, that would be enough. »
- This evaluation came too late, it"s hard to remeber what I thought about the course»

17. How did you appreciate the practical class on JMatPro?

- It was very good!»
- I think that it has been very useful and it helped very much to understand important concepts»
- Gave us a chance to experience the software and develop an understanding of equilibrium and metastable phases.»
- good»
- To be honest, it did not live up to the hype! Let me put it this way. It was too rudimental. »
- Yes it was appreciated»
- Bra, men självklart hade det varit mer givande om man skulle kunna sitta ner själv med programmet.»
- pretty good and practical»
- very good and useful»
- Introducing and letting students know about such a software and its capabilities was a great idea.»
- very well»
- Very much»
- Being able to work with such a priceless software was an honor.»
- perhaps a bit too easy»

18. How did you evaluate the practical class on heat treatment of steel?

- good»
- It was interesting but there were too many questions and some of them were confused and difficult to answer in that time.»
- As in 14, definately should keep it til next year. It is of real help!»
- very good»
- It was not a real practical class in the real sense of the word. Perhaps the time frame restricted you from having labs on this subject but heat treatment needs some hands-on experience to be understood. »
- Fine»
- Det var en mycket lärorik uppgift.»
- excellent, push us into the real working circumstance.»
- very good and useful»
- The class was a good help for students who didn"t have a background in Metallurgy and heat treatment of steels. The two assistants were also helpful and studios.»
- well»
- It was a good class, I lerned alot!»
- Johanna and Stefan did their bests.»
- good»

Kursutvärderingssystem från