|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
TKDAT ht09 Computer communication, EDA343Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2009-12-11 - 2010-01-24 Antal svar: 25 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 30% Kontaktperson: Lars Nordlund» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.25 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.68 - Would"ve liked to spend more, but another course took too much time» (At most 15 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?25 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.32 - Less than 25 %. Almost all classes collided with those in another course I was taking.» (25%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?25 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.88 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.04 - it looks like pretty musch stuff, which you have to know for the exam» (No, the goals are set too high) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - Some exam questions felt too undefined. Much too open and allow for endless writing to "make sure" that whatever unknown factor is being sought is sure to be in the answer.» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?25 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.36 - Since I was not attending many classes, it didn"t help me very much.» (Small extent) 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.2 - the course book is very helpful» (Large extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?25 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.28 - I"m missing the lecture slides on the webpage.» (Rather badly) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?25 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.8 - Some of the lab-assistants were entirely useless. Perhaps this was a language barrier in some cases, but I often felt they barely knew what was going on.» (Rather poor) 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?25 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.68 - I enjoyed. We finished each assignments by meeting-up and taking time.» (Very well) 11. How was the course workload?25 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.96 12. How was the total workload this study period?25 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.44 Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.62 - It"s really good course. As syllabus mentioned, it"s basic but extensive. The contents can be elaborate in future by each person"s interest.» (Excellent) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The lecture slides»- Labs, Assignments» - Marina"s lecture and book.» - All» - The exercises should be preserved as they were very helpful (to me). The lecture was interesting and should be preserved in the way it was given.» - The second lab (at Lindholmen) was fun.» - Labs» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The TAs should learn more about pedagogic. Khoa Huynh was the best in explaining in tutorial sessions. Zhang Fu and Giorgos Georgiadis need alot more structure and they shouldn"t assume that the students know things in advance.»- The Cisco certificate should give extra points, and be encouraged to follow.» - More exercise sessions hence increase exercise/numerical related questions in exams.» - less topics...too much new information. you cannot get in such a short time.» - Better exam-design with more clear goals for the questions.» - The exam was just 1 day before a crucial exam on MPCOM program. This is a huge flaw!» - Its OK» - I did not like the abuse of the word "exam" in the lectures of Mr Schiller. I hope next year he will be able to get the students attention by an interesting lecture instead of putting more presure on everyone.» - The first lab was kind of easy.» - nothing» - Lectures. The lecturer speaks to quite and has a monotone voice which makes students sleep...» 16. Additional comments- It would be nice for everyone if Marina could take some time to learn the proper pronunciation for key words such as circuit and header etc. Otherwise her english is good. Some of the many metaphores could leave room for actual scenarios in my opinion.»- Marina is a good lecturer, but perhaps needs to find a way to amplify her voice somewhat, and improve a few key words with regards to pronunciation. » - Thank you for teaching.» - Teacher was good»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
60%