Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

TKDAT ht09 Computer communication, EDA343

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-12-11 - 2010-01-24
Antal svar: 25
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 30%
Kontaktperson: Lars Nordlund»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

25 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»15 60%
Around 20 hours/week»4 16%
Around 25 hours/week»5 20%
Around 30 hours/week»1 4%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.68

- Would"ve liked to spend more, but another course took too much time» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

25 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»7 28%
50%»7 28%
75%»7 28%
100%»4 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.32

- Less than 25 %. Almost all classes collided with those in another course I was taking.» (25%)
- Just conflict with other course"s assignment deadline.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

25 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»6 24%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 4%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»8 32%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»10 40%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

23 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»22 95%
No, the goals are set too high»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.04

- it looks like pretty musch stuff, which you have to know for the exam» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

24 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»7 29%
Yes, definitely»10 41%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»7 29%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Some exam questions felt too undefined. Much too open and allow for endless writing to "make sure" that whatever unknown factor is being sought is sure to be in the answer.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

25 svarande

Small extent»4 16%
Some extent»10 40%
Large extent»9 36%
Great extent»2 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.36

- Since I was not attending many classes, it didn"t help me very much.» (Small extent)
- I liked that lecturer mentioned clearly what we need to focus on now and what not. Since course contents are extensive, it took time what is the focus of this course until I start looking at old exams. Also it was interesting to know current research area of Ericsson or etc... It would be nice if lecturer introduce us own research interest, since I think it"s helpful to elabolate this course in future by each student"s interest, or to stitch current knowledge we had before.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

24 svarande

Small extent»1 4%
Some extent»2 8%
Large extent»12 50%
Great extent»9 37%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- the course book is very helpful» (Large extent)
- Excellent course book in my opinion.» (Large extent)
- I liked text book. But hard to start reading since it"s long. I used study guide of the book homepage and it was helpful.» (Great extent)
- Nearly all my learning came from the course literature.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

25 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 8%
Rather well»14 56%
Very well»9 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- I"m missing the lecture slides on the webpage.» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

25 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 8%
Rather good»7 28%
Very good»10 40%
I did not seek help»6 24%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- Some of the lab-assistants were entirely useless. Perhaps this was a language barrier in some cases, but I often felt they barely knew what was going on.» (Rather poor)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

25 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»11 44%
Very well»11 44%
I did not seek cooperation»3 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

- I enjoyed. We finished each assignments by meeting-up and taking time.» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

25 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»4 16%
Adequate»18 72%
High»3 12%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.96

12. How was the total workload this study period?

25 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 4%
Adequate»12 48%
High»12 48%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.44

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

24 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 8%
Adequate»8 33%
Good»11 45%
Excellent»3 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

- It"s really good course. As syllabus mentioned, it"s basic but extensive. The contents can be elaborate in future by each person"s interest.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The lecture slides»
- Labs, Assignments»
- Marina"s lecture and book.»
- All»
- The exercises should be preserved as they were very helpful (to me). The lecture was interesting and should be preserved in the way it was given.»
- The second lab (at Lindholmen) was fun.»
- Labs»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The TAs should learn more about pedagogic. Khoa Huynh was the best in explaining in tutorial sessions. Zhang Fu and Giorgos Georgiadis need alot more structure and they shouldn"t assume that the students know things in advance.»
- The Cisco certificate should give extra points, and be encouraged to follow.»
- More exercise sessions hence increase exercise/numerical related questions in exams.»
- less topics...too much new information. you cannot get in such a short time.»
- Better exam-design with more clear goals for the questions.»
- The exam was just 1 day before a crucial exam on MPCOM program. This is a huge flaw!»
- Its OK»
- I did not like the abuse of the word "exam" in the lectures of Mr Schiller. I hope next year he will be able to get the students attention by an interesting lecture instead of putting more presure on everyone.»
- The first lab was kind of easy.»
- nothing»
- Lectures. The lecturer speaks to quite and has a monotone voice which makes students sleep...»

16. Additional comments

- It would be nice for everyone if Marina could take some time to learn the proper pronunciation for key words such as circuit and header etc. Otherwise her english is good. Some of the many metaphores could leave room for actual scenarios in my opinion.»
- Marina is a good lecturer, but perhaps needs to find a way to amplify her voice somewhat, and improve a few key words with regards to pronunciation. »
- Thank you for teaching.»
- Teacher was good»

Kursutvärderingssystem från