Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
TIDAL ht09 Router & Switchteknik, LEU420
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2009-12-10 - 2010-01-24 Antal svar: 16 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 34% Kontaktperson: Lars Nordlund»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.15 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 1 | | 6% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 3 | | 20% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 2 | | 13% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 9 | | 60% |
Genomsnitt: 4.26 - a lot» (At least 35 hours/week)
2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 15 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 7 | | 46% |
100%» | | 8 | | 53% |
Genomsnitt: 4.53 - More than 80% of the course i"ve attended.» (75%)
- i think i missed half a lecture» (100%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?15 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 1 | | 6% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 14 | | 93% |
Genomsnitt: 3.93 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.15 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 13 | | 86% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 2 | | 13% |
Genomsnitt: 2.13 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?15 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 1 | | 6% |
Yes, definitely» | | 14 | | 93% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.93 - but haven"t received the result yet» (Yes, definitely)
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?15 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 20% |
Large extent» | | 7 | | 46% |
Great extent» | | 5 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 3.13 - There were seminars.Each group presented different topics.Some times the group was not prepared and the topic was not understandable.So I think there should be large part of lectures from the teacher and there should be less part from of the seminars.» (Some extent)
- his own lecturs» (Great extent)
7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?15 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 13% |
Large extent» | | 4 | | 26% |
Great extent» | | 9 | | 60% |
Genomsnitt: 3.46 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?15 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 8 | | 53% |
Very well» | | 7 | | 46% |
Genomsnitt: 3.46
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?15 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 5 | | 33% |
Very good» | | 10 | | 66% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?15 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 1 | | 6% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 13% |
Very well» | | 11 | | 73% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 1 | | 6% |
Genomsnitt: 3.8 11. How was the course workload?15 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 3 | | 20% |
High» | | 5 | | 33% |
Too high» | | 7 | | 46% |
Genomsnitt: 4.26 12. How was the total workload this study period?15 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 13% |
High» | | 6 | | 40% |
Too high» | | 7 | | 46% |
Genomsnitt: 4.33 - I had 3 course: Network Security, Routing Technology, and Advanced Java programming(IT university)» (Too high)
- I was taking 3 courses in total. » (Too high)
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?15 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 5 | | 33% |
Excellent» | | 10 | | 66% |
Genomsnitt: 4.66 - I had good idea about the security issues, vulnerabilities, and the protocols that secure communication. Also, the labs were nice and practical labs to some extent» (Good)
- But i found little mismatch between the reading material and labs.Most of the time labs came early before the chapter.
Specially in last week case study and assignment came early befor the reading material.Thats why I did not feel confident in CCNA4.Teacher should do something to make the CCNA4 interesting» (Good)
- the instructor is very well in this course. In addition to his teaching capabilities, he also has a very good personality and always tries to help students.» (Excellent)
- I think with amount of work this course should be of 15 credit hour.» (Excellent)
14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- the seminars»
- Labs»
- All , infact more couses like these should be added »
- Everything.»
- the whole program and its goals»
- The course is awesome and very good teacher, it is a very high load on the course but in the end it is worth it as you have learned a lot. It is very good that there is no regular examination instead you are being examined during the whole 7 week period with different tests, hand ins and so on.»
- The way course is presented and taught should definitely be preserved. »
15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- lab exam duration should be at least 2 hours»
- I think there should be an extra lab for VPN including IPSEC, SSL, and SSH options.»
- nothing»
- there should be less seminars or may be it should be removed and there should be something else.Because as far as i know,whatever i understand is from the reading material but not from the seminars.It makes me bored.»
- the number of credits. it should be atleast a 15 credit course and should cover atleast one full semester not one quarter since the workload is very high»
- Nothing that I can come think of right now.»
- The seminar part of the course was not that good. Some students were poorly prepared and that made those seminars less interesting.»
- The teacher , He discriminates between nationalities...a completely different behavior with people of different nationalities....I think this should be looked upon.......otherwise without any doubt he have very good knowledge..but i was really surprised by his behavior.»
16. Additional comments- i have learnt a lot from this course in this quarter, it was the best course i have taken in chalmers until now»
- More coursed in this field are required.»
- there should be another quarter of advance level of CCNA.May be CCNP or advance topics of CCNA.»
- a course to prepare students for CCNP can also be included in the curriculum»
- The course gave me an opportunity to work in an industry related environment. I really liked this course and hope that in future the department will consider starting a new course relating to CCNP. »
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|