Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Computational nonlinear mechanics 2010, TME155
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2009-12-15 - 2010-02-10 Antal svar: 13 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?% Kontaktperson: Magnus Ekh» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp
Own effort1. Approximately how many hours per week did you work with the course?Estimate the total time in, including both teaching activities and your own studies. Try to estimate the average for the whole study period.13 svarande
At most 10 hours» | | 1 | | 7% |
About 15 hours» | | 2 | | 15% |
About 20 hours» | | 4 | | 30% |
About 25 hours» | | 3 | | 23% |
About 30 hours» | | 0 | | 0% |
At least 35 hours» | | 3 | | 23% |
Genomsnitt: 3.61 2. How was the course workload?13 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 5 | | 38% |
High» | | 7 | | 53% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 3.69 - Adequate to high, was just right, kept us busy but definitely wasn"t too much.» (Adequate)
3. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?13 svarande
0%» | | 1 | | 7% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 3 | | 23% |
100%» | | 9 | | 69% |
Genomsnitt: 4.46 4. How much time did you spend on this course, as compared to your parallell course?13 svarande
Much less» | | 0 | | 0% |
Less» | | 3 | | 23% |
Similar» | | 2 | | 15% |
More» | | 3 | | 23% |
Much more» | | 5 | | 38% |
I only had this course» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.76 - I wanted to spend more, but the other course was a killer.» ( Less)
- Mostly because the other course (Vibration Control) didn"t offer much to do except for studying for the exam.» (Much more)
- I took an elective outside of the department which turned out to have a very low workload.» (Much more)
Goals and goal fulfilment5. How understandable and reasonable are the course goals?12 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 2 | | 16% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 10 | | 83% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 6. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?13 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 13 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 - I don"t know. I havent read them.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)
7. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?13 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 7 | | 53% |
Yes, definitely» | | 5 | | 38% |
I don"t know/have not done the exam yet» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 2.53 - Thought I"d studied very hard and I felt comfortable in all areas covered by the learning outcomes. I only got grade 3 so I guess I either did a poor performance or the exam was too difficult.» (To some extent)
- I myself did not do good at exam.» (To some extent)
- the examination focused too much on knowing by heart. should focus more on understanding» (To some extent)
- I liked the exam style, five questions worth five points each is just right to show that we know what we"re doing but allow us to make errors as well.» (Yes, definitely)
8. How much did computer assignment 1 help you to reach the goals?13 svarande
Not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 5 | | 38% |
To large extent» | | 8 | | 61% |
Genomsnitt: 2.61 9. How much did computer assignment 2 help you to reach the goals?13 svarande
Not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 5 | | 38% |
To large extent» | | 8 | | 61% |
Genomsnitt: 2.61 10. How much did computer assignment 3 help you to reach the goals?13 svarande
Not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 5 | | 38% |
To large extent» | | 8 | | 61% |
Genomsnitt: 2.61 - The first two assignments were very useful. The third felt more like another 50+ hours of getting Newton iterations to work.» (To some extent)
teaching and course administration11. To what extent has the lectures been of help for your learning?13 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 4 | | 30% |
Large extent» | | 4 | | 30% |
Great extent» | | 5 | | 38% |
Genomsnitt: 3.07 - confusing when using different systems i.e. 6 vs 9 voight» (Some extent)
12. To what extent has the classes been of help for your learning?13 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 5 | | 38% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 15% |
Great extent» | | 6 | | 46% |
Genomsnitt: 3.07 13. To what extent has the Bonet & Wood book been of help for your learning?13 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 23% |
Large extent» | | 8 | | 61% |
Great extent» | | 2 | | 15% |
Genomsnitt: 2.92 14. How well do you think that the lectures and the contents of the book fit together?13 svarande
Very little» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 2 | | 15% |
To large extent» | | 9 | | 69% |
Almost completely» | | 2 | | 15% |
Genomsnitt: 3 - use the same system» (To some extent)
15. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?13 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 5 | | 38% |
Very well» | | 8 | | 61% |
Genomsnitt: 3.61
Study climate16. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help during class?13 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 1 | | 7% |
Very good» | | 12 | | 92% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.92 17. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help between the classes?13 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 1 | | 7% |
Very good» | | 11 | | 84% |
I did not seek help» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 4 - only one teacher makes it harder...» (Rather good)
18. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?13 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 5 | | 38% |
Very well» | | 8 | | 61% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.61 - Most people in the Solid track know each other now and are generally happy to spend time helping each other out.» (Rather well)
Summarizing questions19. What is your general impression of the course?13 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 7% |
Good» | | 8 | | 61% |
Excellent» | | 4 | | 30% |
Genomsnitt: 4.23 - But to heavy!!! » (Good)
- only the exam was a bit of a dissappointment » (Good)
20. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- the two first assignments.»
- Computer assignments. »
- The assignments and lectures»
- Everything»
- Assignments»
- The detailed learning outcomes were of much help.»
- the book, contents of assignments»
21. What should definitely be changed to next year?- the third assignment»
- It would be good to have some problem solving sessions»
- I think that it is better to specify some points for the assignments, because they were so time consuming and very related to the content of the book.»
- Nothing»
- More feedback on exercises if possible.»
- dont hand out codes for assignments. better to give less help and some bonus points for the exam. thats how you learn.
too long derivations to learn by heart for the exam. thats just no fun. understanding should be a keyword.»
22. Additional comments- To hard exam.»
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|