Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Power engineering, design project, EEK150

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-12-08 - 2010-01-24
Antal svar: 20
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 55%
Kontaktperson: Valborg Ekman»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

19 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 15%
Around 20 hours/week»5 26%
Around 25 hours/week»7 36%
Around 30 hours/week»3 15%
At least 35 hours/week»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.68

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

17 svarande

0%»1 5%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 17%
100%»13 76%

Genomsnitt: 4.58

- I was not able to get what i want to do the design project so i drop it. The selection is not fair,because selection on first come first serve. i will write more comets at 15.» (?)
- no teaching» (?)
- there was no teaching» (0%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

19 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 15%
The goals are difficult to understand»2 10%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 31%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»8 42%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The supervisor seemed not to have clear goals for us, every week it looked as if we had to do something different everytime.» (The goals are difficult to understand)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

16 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»4 25%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»12 75%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.75

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

14 svarande

No, not at all»1 7%
To some extent»3 21%
Yes, definitely»4 28%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»6 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

- It doesn"t have any exam!» (?)
- there was no exam just there was presentation» (?)
- presentation only» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»5 27%
Some extent»5 27%
Large extent»7 38%
Great extent»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.22

- There was little guidance. Due to the short time we had to develop the project, I consider that appropiate guidance is essential to achieve the goals.» (Small extent)
- We didn"t have any lectures» (Small extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»6 37%
Some extent»5 31%
Large extent»3 18%
Great extent»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.06

- no course literature» (?)
- We didn"t have any course literature» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

17 svarande

Very badly»1 5%
Rather badly»3 17%
Rather well»12 70%
Very well»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.76

- no hand outs» (?)
- Difficult to say. Web page was not used at all.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

19 svarande

Very poor»2 10%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 15%
Very good»14 73%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.52

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

19 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»6 31%
Very well»13 68%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

- Interesting to work with 5 guys with different background and ideas for the project. A bit complicated for 5 minds to agree.» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

19 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»3 15%
Adequate»11 57%
High»4 21%
Too high»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

12. How was the total workload this study period?

19 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»13 68%
High»4 21%
Too high»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

19 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 10%
Adequate»6 31%
Good»7 36%
Excellent»4 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

- I would say that the project was not very well planned from the beggining. » (Fair)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The empirical aspect should be preserved. It is much important for us to practice electrical issues in real world when we have studied the theories before. Also, visiting programs of substations in Gothenburg should be maintained. It was very very useful and outstanding for us.»
- try to short some things that will help a lot»
- Power system topics. However, it should be very well planned. For our project, smart protection schemes, the use of Aristo was not appropiate, since we needed a software with programming capabilities together with power system real time simulation. »
- continuation»
- Study visit which give students a lot of information. »
- The possibility of choosing from different projects.»
- study visits, lectures»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The quantity of these project courses shall be more than before. We will learn a lot of experimental experiences from these useful courses. Also, we practice team working and establish links to companies who sell electrical equipment and devices. I think that one of this type of courses worth than taking a couple of theoretical courses that have not enough empirical and environmental aspects.»
- work load has to be equally devided by the teacher it self»
- Selection process should need to change. If there is more then the required number then we should do lucky draw system not first come first serve basis.Or if not make it two groups. i was really dispointed this year, hope this will not happen in future.»
- The topic. Two years in a row with voltage collapse prevention is enough. »
- proper outlining of work to be done inadvance»
- remove limitation of the number of students and give them possibility to attend this course.»
- The information about the report and the presentation could be much clearer.»
- there should be a division of the whole project to parts per week, so that per week results should be analyzed and then proceed»

16. Additional comments

- I think we need more presentation sessions such as Göteborg Energy did that for us. They have very good experiences which are directly related to our lessons-learned during studying period at Chalmers. We can make a bridge between our perceptions and their experiences to be more successful in our future careers :)»
- it is very good experience but, there is no presentation, because of three courses in the same quarter, the work load extended a lot. »
- Better planned project from supervisors end will be appreciated for future students.»
- the course is good and practical oriented»
- It is better to supervise the group memberes activity individually and get feedback according to the certain schedule until project deadline reach. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från