|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Methods for electronic system design and verification, Lp 2 Ht09, DAT110Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2009-12-08 - 2009-12-21 Antal svar: 16 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 40% Kontaktperson: Åsa Samdell»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.37 - To much work, it steals too much time from the analog course.» (At least 35 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.25 - I attended the labs, both on my booked sessions and on the Tuesday session. Even outside the scheduled sessions for this course. The lectures I did not attend, mostly.» (75%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.43 - He teacher may have show them and talk about them but they are still not good. They dont give any specifics at all. They are so general they can nearly belong to any course, and his grading system is not a very good idea either. He say what part that is most dominant but not how we are suppose to get them better.» (The goals are difficult to understand) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.12 - Considering how unclear the course is, in the manner of lab compendiums and so on, the lectures didn"t give much knowledge since just hearing a teacher talk doesn"t make any one learn anything.» (No, the goals are set too high) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.5 - Answer as i do since i don"t know if examination does.
The term paper is chaos since there are NO guidelines to how it"s supposed to be formed. As with the Opposition, nothing to explain what the opposition is supposed to contain (the written opposition that is). The Lab report? nothing here either. The only sort-of-guidelines there is to find is in the lecture slides? They are not clear at all, and does not address things like structure of these reports. » (No, not at all) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?15 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.46 - I suppose that this is concerning the lectures. Since i stopped attending them after lecture 3 or 4, because i didn"t learn anything from them.» (Small extent) 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.43 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - The administration of this course is a joke.
Two homepages? and no posting of vital news on the messageboard (on pingpong), such as when the first hand-in is graded. This just came in a mail, which means there was effectively 3 places students had to check to be up to date. There was no link between the two pages on either one of them. How can schedule and books with the term paper topics not be posted on pingpong if all the other material is there? How can it be that no messages about news on the other site was posted on the pingpong message board?
And furthermore there was the licenses to Cadens? 14 in total and there was many occupied by phd"s? It is NOT ok to have students come to the lab sessions just to tell them they can"t do the labs because there is no licenses for the program. Then, why did we only have one lab assistant who knew the program? especially when he was more or less always occupied with groups showing him labs they had done, or having a problem that took forever to solve (my group waited 1½,h at one time for help).
Then the term paper, opposition and lab report, there is no guidelines to how these should be structured. How can there not be a document were this is stated? And NO, lecture slides does not count (these didn"t give much guidance any way).
Then the lab compendiums.
How can you expect the students ALU"s to work with your testbenches when the compendium did not state explicitly how the interface between them should look like? This issue of communication and interfaces was even brought up in some lectures I believe, but you don"t follow it yourself?» (Very badly) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.37 - On the labs we got quite good help, when the lab assistants was not occupied. Or even when we had a license for the program so we could ask questions.
» (Rather poor) 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.37 11. How well did the collaburation with your lab partner work?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.06 - I did everything.» (Very Poorly) 12. How was the course workload?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.75 - would have been good with a few days to write the labreport after the final lab session.» (Adequate) 13. How was the total workload this study period?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.75 - It was too high beacuse of this course, the analog was ok.» (Too high) Summarizing questions14. What is your general impression of the course?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.31 - The chaos of administration kills the impression totally.» (Poor) 15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- the idea of the course, to let students see and be part of the whole design flow.»- guest lectures» - Labs» - The lab serie is very promising, but maybe focus a bit more on the later stages instead of writing VHDL?» - The Lab Series and Term Paper writing» - in my view the should be same » 16. What should definitely be changed to next year?- ADMINISTRATION. There should be rules against multiple homepages. The lab compendiums should be revised to be more specific. And there must be documents that states how reports and hand-ins should be structured and what they should contain. »- Tung know the VHDL coding part well, but someone should really check the feedback before publiching it. On each lecture the teacher gave negative criticism to his colliges, which is not fun to hear all the time. He presented himself as the best of them all.» - Less slides and the teacher should write on the board. To envolve the students. It was not many students who were on the lectures.» - Stop using diffrent homepages. The information must be more clear, now it is quite confussing and all is given the first few days. The labgroups work very porly, the goals must be more specific since now they actually does not say anything.» - How you divide groups! More licenses or more lab sessions. Not two deadlines on the same day.» - The term paper should be devided into two phases. First phase should consists of synopsis by the student stating clearly what he has planed to do and what are the contants he is going to cover. The teacher should also provide a very quick feed back on his synopsis.» - term paper group partner should be provided from your side. » 17. Additional comments- The course should really be devided in to two parts, with respect to credit. Where you get credit for passing the lab part and credits for the term paper.»- The scare tactic in the first lectures is just idiotic. Stand there and talk grim about grades here and failing there bla bla. This is not the way to motivate students, this may have worked during Primary education but not anylonger. Students here have already spended a couple of years studing any most likely are motivated about it. The only result this scare tactic may have is that the student get less motivated since any intrest they may have in the course will be gone.» - please let us choose groups ourselves, Neither me nor many other students want to work with those who contribute nothing at all... Especially for the coming project!» - (1) The term paper"s group should not consists of more than two persons as it increases dependency and decreases the grade more rapidly if only one in between the group is eager to work. (2) The lab schedule should start earlier and should finish earlier in order to learn more things in the lab. (3) The pre-requisite of the course is "Introduction to Electronic System Design". In this course I learned a lot of stuff regarding VHDL but not Hardware (created by it) while it is Hardware Description Language. So, the next course should must have a lecture in the very start introducing one more time actual Hardware created by describing different VHDL constructs and also precautions writing test banches for Hardware and not for VHDL.»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6%