Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Modeling and fabrication of micro/nanodevices, MCC115, MPNAN, HT2009, MCC115

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-12-07 - 2010-01-24
Antal svar: 5
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 17%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Teknisk fysik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

5 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 40%
Around 20 hours/week»2 40%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»1 20%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

5 svarande

0%»1 20%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 40%
100%»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- There was no teaching» (0%)
- attended my all labs and project meetings.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

5 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 40%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

4 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- The goals were to get hands-on experience in the cleanroom at MC2 but the phd-student who had to "take care" of our group didn"t even have access to the cleanroom when the project started...The goals were cleary set but also cleary unreachable like this» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

5 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 60%
Yes, definitely»1 20%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- We couldn"t finish the project because of a lot of problems as the assisting phd student didn"t have access or driving licences. The masks still had to be produced when we were halfway the project. The end result was quite bad in my opinion but we still passed. We did everything we could do in the time and with the given opportunities so in that point of view it was right we passed. But if one looks at the real result, we should have been failed » (To some extent)
- it would be better if the grading is like 3,4,5.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»1 20%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»2 40%
Great extent»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»1 25%
Some extent»1 25%
Large extent»1 25%
Great extent»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

5 svarande

Very badly»1 20%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»1 20%
Very well»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

5 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 40%
Very good»3 60%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

5 svarande

Very poorly»1 20%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 40%
Very well»2 40%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

11. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

Too low»1 20%
Low»1 20%
Adequate»2 40%
High»1 20%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

12. How was the total workload this study period?

5 svarande

Too low»1 20%
Low»1 20%
Adequate»1 20%
High»2 40%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- Took extra courses...» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

5 svarande

Poor»1 20%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»4 80%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The concept is okay and could give an interesting course as I saw in other groups but the assistant was not suited for the task. He was very nice and did what he could do but he just didn"t have the experience to assist 2 master students.»
- the goals should be kept for next year»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- grading (to 3-5)»

16. Additional comments

- There are some students who are weak take project for easily getting degree without putting their own effort.As the project work is groupwise so some student form a group and dont do nothing and get a good marks for the vertue of their friends activities so i think project work should be difficult so that student cant pass it without giving individual effort.It must be as hard as an equivalent theory course. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från