ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Nanoscience MCC026, MPNAN, HT2009, MCC026

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-12-07 - 2010-01-24
Antal svar: 6
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 30%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Teknisk fysik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

6 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 50%
Around 20 hours/week»1 16%
Around 25 hours/week»1 16%
Around 30 hours/week»1 16%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Very little study material = low workload» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

6 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 16%
100%»5 83%

Genomsnitt: 4.83

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

6 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 16%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 83%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 16%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 83%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.83

- With only attending the lectures and spending very little time on the home work assignments the course seems to be taking not even half the time available. The essays where good though.» (No, the goals are set too low)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 50%
Yes, definitely»1 16%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 16%
Large extent»5 83%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»1 16%
Some extent»2 33%
Large extent»2 33%
Great extent»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- Hardly any at all» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

6 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»3 50%
Very well»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»4 66%
I did not seek help»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

6 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 33%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»4 66%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

11. How was the course workload?

6 svarande

Too low»1 16%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 66%
High»1 16%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

12. How was the total workload this study period?

6 svarande

Too low»1 16%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 66%
High»1 16%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

6 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 16%
Good»5 83%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

- While the amount of knowledge learnt could be greatly improved the sheer amount of organization required for such a course is very impressive.» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- everything»
- The diversity of the lectures»
- Homeworks for each lecture.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- It might be better if the questions which we hand on the end of lecture, are not compulsory. It would be nice to give the students the the opportunity to mention (in the handed paper) which part of the lecture was ambiguous to them.»
- nothing»
- Try all the lecturers to go through the presentations of the others to get a feeling for the overall direction of the course and subsequently they can optimize their part of it.»
- Student presentations. The second presentation (not from NanoLetters) should also be public (given to whole class), so that the students could learn from each other.»

16. Additional comments

- A weekly session with a phd student for making (additional) exercises would be nice.»
- Working in groups (pairs) should be encouraged. Then the students participate more in discussions leading to a better learning outcome. In addition, it is strongly suggested for the lecturers to pay more attention to the material related to the homework problems (because some of them were not directly related to what we heard in the lectures).»

Kursutvärderingssystem från