Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Liquid crystals, physics and applications, MCC080, MPNAN, HT2009, MCC080

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-12-07 - 2010-01-24
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 53%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Teknisk fysik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

7 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 57%
Around 20 hours/week»1 14%
Around 25 hours/week»1 14%
Around 30 hours/week»1 14%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.85

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 14%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 14%
100%»5 71%

Genomsnitt: 4.42

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

7 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 14%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»6 85%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 16%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 83%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.83

- The workload outside the lectures is low and I would have liked to go deeper in the chemistry of the molecules, why would certain molecules have certain LC phases for example.» (No, the goals are set too low)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 16%
Yes, definitely»2 33%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- A larger variation of the questions would have coverd more of the topics in the course. But the questions given did push one"s level of comprehension to the "next level".» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»2 28%
Great extent»5 71%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»1 14%
Some extent»4 57%
Large extent»1 14%
Great extent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.28

- To book went much deeper than the lectures, only the first chapters where used.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

7 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»4 57%
Very well»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- sometimes lecture notes were more than a week late» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»7 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

7 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 42%
Very well»4 57%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

11. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low»1 14%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 71%
High»1 14%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

12. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»1 14%
Low»1 14%
Adequate»2 28%
High»3 42%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- took 3 courses» (High)

Course-specific questions:

13. What did you think about the Problem-based lectures?

7 svarande

not helpful»0 0%
OK»1 14%
very helpful»6 85%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- I love Sarah and Bob» (very helpful)

14. Compare ppt-based, white board, and problem-based lectures.

Good mix? Increase/decrease the amount of any type of lecture?

- Good mix»
- Excellent mix»
- good mix»
- Good mix.»
- increase problem based lectures»
- good mix»

15. What did you think about the lab-project?

Useful? Difficult? Enough introduction? Hours spent?

- Very nice! best lab ever.»
- Good»
- useful to play around with the stuff and learn so somethings on your own and by your own curiosity.»
- Very useful, but it can start one week earlier since there are much to do in other courses as well during the final weeks. One problem was that the equipment used in the lab-project was new to many of the students and that takes learning-time not included in the lab-project schedule. Maybe this can be solved by introducing the equipment better during the compulsory laborations.»
- it was useful to get a feel of the subject.. according to me more topics should be dealt in the lab to make our learning effective.»
- was not necessary for course understanding, but fun and good complement for the grading. spent 8 hours in the lab, and around 12 for preparations and report»

16. What did you think of the examination method: Homework, Lab-project plus Oral Exam.

Relevant for the learning goals? Fair?

- Also very nice.»
- Seems good and fair. But there is plenty of room to include one or two literature papers for during the first half of the course.»
- sound good. haven"t checked the last part.»
- Good variation. And the homeworks really force one to think throughout the subjects in question.»
- good»
- Good mix»

Summarizing questions

17. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»2 28%
Excellent»5 71%

Genomsnitt: 4.71

- Best course i have had on Chalmers» (Excellent)

18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The lab-project»
- Everything»
- Everything»
- The course structure, i.e. Oral examinations, lab work, lab projects, assingments.»

19. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- More work, give the students material to prepare themselves for the lab sessions and add papers that students have to write.»
- Look at the lab-project answer.»

20. Additional comments

- This course is the reason why I got enthusiastic about going to Chalmers for an exchange. And it turned out to be even better, which is amazing given my high expectations. The only drawback is that the workload was low and the chemistry of the LC material was hardly touched. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från