Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Advanced Photonics, MCC105, MPMPE, HT2009, MCC105

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-12-07 - 2010-01-24
Antal svar: 5
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 100%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

4 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 50%
Around 20 hours/week»1 25%
Around 25 hours/week»1 25%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.75

- I just participate the seminars. nothing to do more in the whole week. At the end I just spent time on doing my project and preparing for presentation.» (?)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

5 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»5 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

5 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 40%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

5 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- I think it is reasonable for a second year Master student, not for a first year one. I think having a background in optoelectronics is totally necessary.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

4 svarande

No, not at all»1 25%
To some extent»1 25%
Yes, definitely»2 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- no examination on this course» (?)
- It doesnt have any exam.» (No, not at all)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»1 20%
Some extent»1 20%
Large extent»3 60%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- In some lectures I didn"t understand even a word!» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»2 50%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»2 50%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

5 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»5 100%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Some lectures materials and hand outs were not published in homepage or even sent by emails.» (Rather badly)
- Please keep the timeedit updated! even before the course so students can review them when selecting courses.» (Rather badly)
- i think it would be very good to update the schedule on the chalmers time edit instead of sending by email. » (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

5 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 20%
Very good»3 60%
I did not seek help»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 4

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

5 svarande

Very poorly»1 20%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 20%
Very well»2 40%
I did not seek cooperation»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

11. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

Too low»1 20%
Low»1 20%
Adequate»2 40%
High»1 20%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- We could easilly covered twice the number of lectures. » (Too low)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 40%
Adequate»3 60%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

5 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 40%
Adequate»1 20%
Good»1 20%
Excellent»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- There should been more interactive elements» (Adequate)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- lectures from various research areas presented by masters in those areas.»
- Magnus Carlsson did a good presentation, and so did the other in-house lecturers. More of them please :-)»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- group work between students should be inserted.»
- The presentation skills of the guy from KTH. More lectures and more interactive elements.»

16. Additional comments

Kursutvärderingssystem från