Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Foundations for Photonics Engineering, MCC045, MPMPE, HT2009, MCC045

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-12-07 - 2010-01-24
Antal svar: 8
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 38%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

8 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 37%
Around 20 hours/week»2 25%
Around 25 hours/week»1 12%
Around 30 hours/week»2 25%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

8 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»5 62%
100%»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 4.37

- rather 80 %» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

8 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 12%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 12%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 12%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 62%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

7 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»7 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

7 svarande

No, not at all»1 14%
To some extent»2 28%
Yes, definitely»1 14%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- I jump-off the course.» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»2 25%
Some extent»4 50%
Large extent»2 25%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- the course was too abstract, plus what he thought didnt manifest in the kind of questions you get in exams.» (Small extent)
- not so good. an experiences teachers needed.» (Some extent)
- the communication of teacher was poor. it should be improved» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 50%
Large extent»3 37%
Great extent»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.62

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

8 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 25%
Rather well»6 75%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- didnt really help that much.» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 12%
Rather good»5 62%
Very good»2 25%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

8 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 12%
Rather well»4 50%
Very well»3 37%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- this is because, we had the same problem. the course was difficult to grasp.f» (Rather poorly)

11. How was the course workload?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 75%
High»2 25%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

12. How was the total workload this study period?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 12%
Adequate»3 37%
High»1 12%
Too high»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- the foundation for microwave course was rather tedious. so in total, the whole study period has being overloaded.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

8 svarande

Poor»1 12%
Fair»3 37%
Adequate»2 25%
Good»2 25%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.62

- students always want to pass the course. the material we are thought in class and even tutorial does not affect the kind of questions we get in the exam. Its like we have no idea about most of the questions. It was really bad to be honest.» (Poor)
- The tutorials could have been more clear, i.e. the teacher went through the problems too fast. The normal lectures (i.e. not tutorials) were sometimes too "slow" and it did not feel like I was learning anything new during those lectures. The laboration was a "catastrophe". The lab-assistent was more absent than present and he did not give much help either. Which means that I did not learn much during the laboration. For a start I think there should be some pre-study questions in the laboration manual. In that way the students are more prepared and know better what to do during the lab-session.» (Adequate)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Some lectures were provided by Jörgen, his style of teaching was a good experience for me. Lab was totally crucial in order to understand the Fourier optics.»
- Keep the homework »
- assignments and labs»
- lab exercise»
- the lab was kinda OK.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- 1)number of lectures is low! it would be better if we could have 14 or 15 lectures instead of 12. 2) I think Quantum photonics part should be covered in the syllabus, or we can have a separate elective course for that.»
- Look at the "Summarizing questions" comments.»
- teacher»
- the exam type questions and wat is selected to be lectured about in class.»

16. Additional comments

- Johan really tried to improve his style of teaching, which was really precious for me!»
- I hope something can be done about this course because its not by accident when more than 75% of students fail a course. IT pretty bad.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från