ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Computer Architecture, Lp 2 Ht09, DAT105/DIT051

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-12-08 - 2009-12-21
Antal svar: 12
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 23%
Kontaktperson: Åsa Samdell»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

12 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 41%
Around 20 hours/week»3 25%
Around 25 hours/week»1 8%
Around 30 hours/week»1 8%
At least 35 hours/week»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

12 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 8%
75%»4 33%
100%»7 58%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

12 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 16%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 16%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»8 66%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 90%
No, the goals are set too high»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.1

- but it"s my fault, I didn"t have the basics. Still interesting, thanks to the first two reminder sessions.» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 18%
Yes, definitely»6 54%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»7 58%
Large extent»2 16%
Great extent»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- The lectures were a bit monotonous, use of animation/ videos or introducing research topics early on could have been a good break.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the lectures been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 41%
Large extent»4 33%
Great extent»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

8. To what extent has the exercises been fo help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»6 50%
Large extent»3 25%
Great extent»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

9. To what extent has the project been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 16%
Large extent»6 50%
Great extent»4 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- It forced me to learn before the exam :)» (Large extent)

10. To what extent has the "real-stuff studies" been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»2 16%
Some extent»3 25%
Large extent»4 33%
Great extent»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

11. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»1 8%
Some extent»1 8%
Large extent»5 41%
Great extent»5 41%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

12. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

12 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 8%
Rather well»4 33%
Very well»7 58%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- I would have liked to know where the exam was.» (Rather badly)

Study climate

13. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

12 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 8%
Rather good»3 25%
Very good»7 58%
I did not seek help»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

14. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

12 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 8%
Rather well»3 25%
Very well»8 66%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.58

- when you say "grading is individual", then do an individual grading...» (Rather poorly)

15. How was the course workload?

12 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 8%
Adequate»7 58%
High»4 33%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

16. How was the total workload this study period?

12 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 8%
Adequate»6 50%
High»4 33%
Too high»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.41

- with 150%...» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

17. What is your general impression of the course?

12 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 25%
Good»5 41%
Excellent»4 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.08

18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Project, real stuff studies»
- All the things, I think so»

19. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- labs, which where really boring. Ok, it is good to do things by hand to learn, but when we understood, it was very boring to go through all the files do get some numbers. Please write a scrpit or something to make it centered on technique, and not on handwriting of numbers.»
- Some time of exercises can be merged into lecture series which will be very usefull. Increased class discussion increases understanding»

20. Additional comments

- in the real stuff study, we had to do a presentation as engineers for engineers, which is almost never the case in real life. Maybe it was made to be like this, but I would have find it -more- interesting if it was a presentation to explain the pros and cons of a processor to a "newbie" audience. Some people did so bad their presentation, and nothing have been said about how ugly their slides where, and how boring they were. This is what they should learn when doing a presentation, more than if the Pentium 4 is great or not.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från