ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Analog integrated circuit design, Lp 2 Ht09, DAT100

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-12-08 - 2009-12-21
Antal svar: 15
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 42%
Kontaktperson: Åsa Samdell»

Your background

1. My study background is:

15 svarande

Chalmers civilingenjör programme - Electrical Engineering»4 26%
Chalmers civilingenjör programme - Computer Engineering»1 6%
Chalmers civilingenjör - other programme»1 6%
Chalmers högskoleingenjör programme - Electrical Engineering»2 13%
Chalmers högskoleingenjör programme - Computer Engineering»0 0%
Chalmers högskoleingenjör - other programme»0 0%
Other Swedish civilingenjör programme»0 0%
Other Swedish högskoleingenjör programme»0 0%
Foreign university - Electrical Engineering»5 33%
Foreign university - Computer Engineering»1 6%
Foreign university - other programme»0 0%
Other (explain below)»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 5.6

- Electronic and Communications Engineering» (Other (explain below))

2. I am currently enrolled in this master programme:

15 svarande

Integrated Electronic System Design»12 80%
Other Chalmers master programme»1 6%
Not enrolled in master programme»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 1.33

- Communications engineering student» (Other Chalmers master programme)

3. Did you take the course MCC090 Digital circuit design, here at Chalmers?

15 svarande

Yes, studied and passed.»8 53%
Yes, studied but has not yet passed.»5 33%
No, but I think I have studied something similar before.»0 0%
No, and I think that I did not have that entire background.»1 6%
Don"t know»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 1.8

- Took the course, however scheduling conflicts bordering on the absurd in terms of conflicts forced me to drop the course. Passed the lab part.» (Yes, studied but has not yet passed.)
- Kjell"s fault» (Yes, studied but has not yet passed.)

Your own effort

4. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

15 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 26%
Around 20 hours/week»5 33%
Around 25 hours/week»3 20%
Around 30 hours/week»2 13%
At least 35 hours/week»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- It was good but this course got less time then it deserved since the method course took too much of the time.» (Around 20 hours/week)

5. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

15 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»2 13%
50%»1 6%
75%»9 60%
100%»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.86

6. How many other courses did you take this period?

15 svarande

0»0 0%
1»12 80%
2»3 20%
Other (explain below)»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

7. How understandable are the course goals?

15 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 6%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 26%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»10 66%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

8. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

14 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 7%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»13 92%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.92

9. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

13 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»6 46%
Yes, definitely»4 30%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 2.76

10. Did the examination, including prelabs and lab reports, assess whether you have reached the goals?

14 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 28%
Yes, definitely»8 57%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

Teaching and course administration

11. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 26%
Large extent»10 66%
Great extent»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

12. To what extent have the lectures been of help for you learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 33%
Large extent»8 53%
Great extent»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- How exactly does this question differ from the previous one?» (Large extent)

13. To what extent do you agree on the following statements relating to Roger Malmberg"s (Quamcom) guest lecture?

Matrisfråga

Increased my understanding of analog design tradeoffs
14 svarande

Disagree fully»0 0%
Disagree somewhat»0 0%
Neutral»3 30%
Agree somewhat»7 70%
Agree fully»0 0%
Did not attend»4

Genomsnitt: 3.7

Showed applications of interest to me
14 svarande

Disagree fully»0 0%
Disagree somewhat»0 0%
Neutral»4 40%
Agree somewhat»5 50%
Agree fully»1 10%
Did not attend»4

Genomsnitt: 3.7

Showed interesting real design examples
15 svarande

Disagree fully»0 0%
Disagree somewhat»1 9%
Neutral»2 18%
Agree somewhat»5 45%
Agree fully»3 27%
Did not attend»4

Genomsnitt: 3.9

Was understandable to me
15 svarande

Disagree fully»0 0%
Disagree somewhat»0 0%
Neutral»5 45%
Agree somewhat»6 54%
Agree fully»0 0%
Did not attend»4

Genomsnitt: 3.54

I recommend keeping it next year
15 svarande

Disagree fully»0 0%
Disagree somewhat»0 0%
Neutral»5 45%
Agree somewhat»4 36%
Agree fully»2 18%
Did not attend»4

Genomsnitt: 3.72

14. To what extent do you agree with the following statements relating to Sven Mattisson"s (Ericsson) guest lecture?

Matrisfråga

- the lecture had too many slides. it would be good to reduce the number of slides and watch all of them in detail.»

Increased my understanding of analog design tradeoffs
14 svarande

Disagree fully»0 0%
Disagree somewhat»1 11%
Neutral»2 22%
Agree somewhat»4 44%
Agree fully»2 22%
Did not attend»5

Genomsnitt: 3.77

Showed applications of interest to me
15 svarande

Disagree fully»0 0%
Disagree somewhat»2 20%
Neutral»1 10%
Agree somewhat»2 20%
Agree fully»5 50%
Did not attend»5

Genomsnitt: 4

Showed interesting real design examples
13 svarande

Disagree fully»0 0%
Disagree somewhat»1 12%
Neutral»1 12%
Agree somewhat»2 25%
Agree fully»4 50%
Did not attend»5

Genomsnitt: 4.12

Was understandable to me
15 svarande

Disagree fully»0 0%
Disagree somewhat»2 20%
Neutral»2 20%
Agree somewhat»6 60%
Agree fully»0 0%
Did not attend»5

Genomsnitt: 3.4

I recommend to keeping it next year
15 svarande

Disagree fully»0 0%
Disagree somewhat»1 10%
Neutral»1 10%
Agree somewhat»2 20%
Agree fully»6 60%
Did not attend»5

Genomsnitt: 4.3

15. To what extent have the tutorials been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 26%
Large extent»8 53%
Great extent»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.93

16. To what extent did the labs help your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»1 6%
Some extent»2 13%
Large extent»4 26%
Great extent»8 53%

Genomsnitt: 3.26

- This has been one of the few examples of enjoyable labs at chalmers where you"re not assumed to be cretinous for once» (Great extent)

17. How do you rate the level of difficulty of the five labs?

Matrisfråga

- Lab one rated as hard due to the unreasonable mess that is the cadense calculator. By lab 2 one has learned not to use it.»
- For me, the last part of lab 5 that concerned the noise was hard.»

Lab 1 Inverter and current mirror
15 svarande

Very easy»3 20%
Somewhat easy»6 40%
Reasonable»5 33%
Somewhat hard»1 6%
Very hard»0 0%
Don"t know»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.26

Lab 2 Differential pair & transamp
15 svarande

Very easy»1 6%
Somewhat easy»2 13%
Reasonable»11 73%
Somewhat hard»1 6%
Very hard»0 0%
Don"t know»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

Lab 3 Design of two-stage amplifier
15 svarande

Very easy»1 6%
Somewhat easy»2 13%
Reasonable»4 26%
Somewhat hard»6 40%
Very hard»2 13%
Don"t know»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

Lab 4 Layout of two-stage amplifier
15 svarande

Very easy»1 6%
Somewhat easy»5 33%
Reasonable»2 13%
Somewhat hard»4 26%
Very hard»3 20%
Don"t know»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

Lab 5 Design of folded-cascode amplifier
15 svarande

Very easy»1 6%
Somewhat easy»2 13%
Reasonable»5 33%
Somewhat hard»4 26%
Very hard»2 13%
Don"t know»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

18. How do you rate the time the in-lab part of each lab took you?

Matrisfråga

Lab 1 Inverter and current mirror
15 svarande

Very short»1 6%
Somewhat short»4 26%
Reasonable»8 53%
Somewhat long»2 13%
Very long»0 0%
Don"t know»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.73

Lab 2 Differential pair & transamp
15 svarande

Very short»1 6%
Somewhat short»2 13%
Reasonable»8 53%
Somewhat long»4 26%
Very long»0 0%
Don"t know»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Lab 3 Design of two-stage amplifier
15 svarande

Very short»1 6%
Somewhat short»1 6%
Reasonable»7 46%
Somewhat long»2 13%
Very long»4 26%
Don"t know»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

Lab 4 Layout of two-stage amplifier
15 svarande

Very short»2 13%
Somewhat short»0 0%
Reasonable»6 40%
Somewhat long»1 6%
Very long»6 40%
Don"t know»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

Lab 5 Design of folded-cascode amplifier
15 svarande

Very short»1 6%
Somewhat short»0 0%
Reasonable»6 40%
Somewhat long»7 46%
Very long»1 6%
Don"t know»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

19. How do you rate the time the prelab took you for the different labs?

Matrisfråga

- When doing the layout for lab 4 it was hard to get access to a computer.»

Lab 1 Inverter and current mirror
15 svarande

Very short»2 13%
Somewhat short»4 26%
Reasonable»7 46%
Somewhat long»0 0%
Very long»2 13%
Don"t know»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.73

Lab 2 Differential pair & transamp
15 svarande

Very short»1 6%
Somewhat short»4 26%
Reasonable»9 60%
Somewhat long»0 0%
Very long»1 6%
Don"t know»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.73

Lab 3 Design of two-stage amplifier
15 svarande

Very short»1 6%
Somewhat short»0 0%
Reasonable»4 26%
Somewhat long»3 20%
Very long»7 46%
Don"t know»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

Lab 4 Layout of amplifier (doing the layout)
13 svarande

Very short»2 15%
Somewhat short»0 0%
Reasonable»8 61%
Somewhat long»2 15%
Very long»1 7%
Don"t know»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Lab 5 Design of folded-cascode amplifier
15 svarande

Very short»1 6%
Somewhat short»0 0%
Reasonable»7 46%
Somewhat long»5 33%
Very long»2 13%
Don"t know»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

20. To what extent do you agree with the following statement on the lab pair arrangement I made (me selecting the partner and assigning different partners labs 1-2 and labs 3-5)?

Matrisfråga

- it was very good to have two different partners!»

It was good to get to know the other (Swedish/foreign) students in the class.
14 svarande

Disagree fully»0 0%
Disagree somewhat»0 0%
Neutral»6 42%
Agree somewhat»5 35%
Agree fully»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.78

It made me work harder on my prelabs
15 svarande

Disagree fully»0 0%
Disagree somewhat»0 0%
Neutral»8 53%
Agree somewhat»5 33%
Agree fully»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

It was generally easy to communicate with my lab partner
15 svarande

Disagree fully»0 0%
Disagree somewhat»1 6%
Neutral»1 6%
Agree somewhat»8 53%
Agree fully»5 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.13

The logistics of keeping track of the data after the lab was easy
15 svarande

Disagree fully»0 0%
Disagree somewhat»0 0%
Neutral»5 33%
Agree somewhat»4 26%
Agree fully»6 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.06

Writing the report and agreeing on what should be in there was easy
15 svarande

Disagree fully»0 0%
Disagree somewhat»1 6%
Neutral»1 6%
Agree somewhat»7 46%
Agree fully»6 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.2

I felt I learnt something about working with persons with other (ethnic or professional) background
15 svarande

Disagree fully»1 6%
Disagree somewhat»0 0%
Neutral»4 26%
Agree somewhat»6 40%
Agree fully»4 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

I was sometimes helped in my learning by a lab partner who knew less than I did (for example by having to explain to the partner)
15 svarande

Disagree fully»1 6%
Disagree somewhat»1 6%
Neutral»3 20%
Agree somewhat»7 46%
Agree fully»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

I was sometimes helped in my learning by a lab partner who knew more than I did.
15 svarande

Disagree fully»1 6%
Disagree somewhat»0 0%
Neutral»3 20%
Agree somewhat»7 46%
Agree fully»4 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.86

I had preferred keeping the same lab partner
15 svarande

Disagree fully»2 13%
Disagree somewhat»3 20%
Neutral»5 33%
Agree somewhat»3 20%
Agree fully»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3

I had preferred being allowed to choose lab partner
15 svarande

Disagree fully»3 20%
Disagree somewhat»1 6%
Neutral»6 40%
Agree somewhat»1 6%
Agree fully»4 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.13

21. To what extent did you experience problems, that you experienced as detrimental to your learning, in dealing with Cadence during the labs?

15 svarande

Small extent»5 33%
Some extent»5 33%
Large extent»5 33%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Fighting the cadence calculator is nothing any human being should have to endure, possibly excepting using it to punish violent criminals or politicians.» (Some extent)

22. In your opinion, would it be beneficial for the the student learning to add an additional in-lab introduction to Cadence (that would imply less teacher hours somewhere else in the course)?

14 svarande

Yes»4 28%
No»8 57%
Don"t know»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 1.85

- yes, a extra layaout lab. » (?)
- it could be exchanged by the cadence demo lecture. i think it is not that comprehensible to look at the slides and understand how to use the tool. it would be easier being in front of the computer.» (Yes)
- The first lab WAS an intoduction, why add another one?» (No)

23. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»1 6%
Some extent»9 60%
Large extent»4 26%
Great extent»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

24. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

15 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»3 20%
Very well»12 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

25. To what extent has Ping-Pong been useful for the course web page administration?

15 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 13%
Large extent»4 26%
Great extent»9 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

- i liked that i could see graphically the status of the hand ins (pre labs and lab reports)» (Great extent)

Study climate

26. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

15 svarande

Very poor»1 6%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 6%
Very good»13 86%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.73

- Paul and Oscar was very helpfull, and so was the teacher.» (Very good)

27. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

15 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 13%
Rather well»2 13%
Very well»11 73%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- The first labpartner was bad, the second was good.» (Rather poorly)

28. How was the course workload?

15 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»9 60%
High»6 40%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

29. How was the total workload this study period?

15 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 6%
Adequate»3 20%
High»7 46%
Too high»4 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.93

- Method curse (not spelled wrong :)) was taking too much time.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

30. What is your general impression of the course?

15 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 6%
Adequate»1 6%
Good»10 66%
Excellent»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 4

31. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- labs and hand ins should definitely preserved »
- corrections on pre lab hand ins were very useful for me. »
- When handing in a lab report in the morning and get it graded same day, which was often the case for me and my lab partner. Really good to get a pass for the lab work and higer grade a exame is necessary.»
- Labs»
- more focuse on cadence»

32. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Give some more guidance on prelab 3 and 5.»
- remove last lecture»

33. Additional comments

- A really fun course. »
- add one more lab on layout»

Kursutvärderingssystem från