ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

0910-2 Testing, debugging and verification, TDA566

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-12-05 - 2010-01-31
Antal svar: 20
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 40%
Kontaktperson: Samuel Bengmark»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

20 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»10 50%
Around 20 hours/week»8 40%
Around 25 hours/week»2 10%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.6

- Mostly lab work.» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

20 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 5%
50%»5 25%
75%»9 45%
100%»5 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- less than 25% both wolfgang and reiner are good lecturers so i regret not going to more of them» (25%)
- Very good teaching, best ever in chalmers!» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

20 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»10 50%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 20%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»6 30%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

11 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»11 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

13 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 15%
Yes, definitely»8 61%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

- The lecture content is too philosophical and the exam is too oriented to problem solving.» (To some extent)
- I thought that this exam was alittle harder than the example exams.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent have the lectures been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»1 5%
Some extent»2 10%
Large extent»7 35%
Great extent»10 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- Great lectures!» (Great extent)

7. To what extent have the exercises been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»2 10%
Some extent»12 60%
Large extent»5 25%
Great extent»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- I have unfortunately been unable to attend many of these. But they have helped.» (Some extent)
- I hadn"t much time to do exercises due to parallel course, hence only some extent.» (Some extent)
- My lab partner and I often did the labs before or in parallel with the exercises, which we did on our own.» (Some extent)

8. To what extent have the lab assignments been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»8 40%
Great extent»12 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

9. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»10 50%
Some extent»4 20%
Large extent»5 25%
Great extent»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 1.85

- None. If slides are not included.» (Small extent)
- Course litterature was good, but they didnt cover much of the course. Might want to add some sidenote that the litterature is not essential to be able to make the course.» (Small extent)
- Good books that I will keep for reference, but I personally didn"t use them that much during the course so I must say some extent for my part.» (Some extent)
- The slides are great, I never read the books.» (Large extent)
- Learnt everyting from the lectures and the slides. Didn"t read any book.» (Large extent)
- if other material includes the slides» (Great extent)

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

19 svarande

Very badly»1 5%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»6 31%
Very well»12 63%

Genomsnitt: 3.52

- Everything is late and takes too long. Slides should be uploaded before the lecture (the old ones are almost the same, but still). » (Very badly)
- Haven"t been looking so much at the Google page.» (Rather well)
- The google group was a nice addition to this.» (Very well)

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

20 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»4 20%
Rather good»5 25%
Very good»5 25%
I did not seek help»6 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.65

- Try to get another room, HC1 isn"t that good.» (Rather poor)

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

20 svarande

Very poorly»1 5%
Rather poorly»1 5%
Rather well»2 10%
Very well»14 70%
I did not seek cooperation»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

13. How was the course workload?

20 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 10%
Adequate»16 80%
High»2 10%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- You can learn and not be swamped with work, nice!» (Low)
- The deadlines for the three labs was not very consistent, very short time for the first lab, very long time for the second lab and relatively short time for the last lab. Maybe spread the labs more evenly over the course duration.» (Adequate)
- Had been high if I would do all exercises and study all slides.» (Adequate)

14. How was the total workload this study period?

20 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»6 30%
High»10 50%
Too high»3 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

Summarizing questions

15. What is your general impression of the course?

20 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 15%
Good»8 40%
Excellent»9 45%

Genomsnitt: 4.3

- Good course» (Excellent)
- Very interesting course with great teachers!» (Excellent)
- I thought it was very good.» (Excellent)
- Really great course, one of the best so far.» (Excellent)
- Very interesting course and very, very well done by the teachers.» (Excellent)

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The Labs»
- Lecture-quality»
- Hard to point any specific thing as I think you should preserve as much as possible.»
- The labs. The Google News Group.»
- The teacers! The labs! The exercises!»
- Structure and contents of the course.»

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Nothing»
- hoare logic seems a bit abstract. hard to see how this is used in the industry»
- The room of the exercises.»
- Getting a approval or return for the laboration hand-ins was sometimes alittle slow (not always, some were fast), otherwise change nothing if you ask me.»
- Labs must be uploaded from the start. If you finish one lab early you should be able to strat the next one. Since the old slides are available I don"t see the problem. Reiner and Wolfgang should also correct labs. Ran and Gabriele clearly didn"t have enough time. Better updates to the website»
- Better opportunity to get help.»
- We should know why we would want the tools when you are presenting them. E.g. Let us do some manual verification and we"ll embrace the Key-Hoare system like the resurrection of baby Jesus himself.»

18. Additional comments

- Thanks for a great course. It had a perfect structure and gave alot!»
- Nice and different course where the teachers really cared about what was discussed.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från