Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
2009/2010 Sequence bioinformatics, UMF018
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2009-12-04 - 2009-12-19 Antal svar: 2 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?% Kontaktperson: Graham Kemp»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.2 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 1 | | 50% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 1 | | 50% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.5 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 2 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 0 | | 0% |
100%» | | 2 | | 100% |
Genomsnitt: 5
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?2 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 1 | | 50% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 1 | | 50% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.1 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 1 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?1 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, definitely» | | 0 | | 0% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 1 | | 100% |
Genomsnitt: 4
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?2 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 100% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 - Some of the lectures was a bit hard to take in, i.e. very theory-heavy without any real examples.» (Large extent)
7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?2 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 50% |
Large extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 3 - I have not read the book but the handouts was very encompassing and really well-used.» (Great extent)
8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?2 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 100% |
Very well» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?2 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very good» | | 2 | | 100% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 4 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?2 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very well» | | 2 | | 100% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 4 11. How was the course workload?2 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 50% |
High» | | 1 | | 50% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 12. How was the total workload this study period?2 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 50% |
High» | | 1 | | 50% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?2 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 50% |
Good» | | 1 | | 50% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - It seems the course tries to touch on a lot of subjects but in this ambition all topics get very little lecture-time. » (Adequate)
14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Perl and HMM lectures should be preserved»
- Markov theory and perl»
15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Some of the teachers are too fast may be they should slow a bit»
- More examples in Markov theory! Apply it to something! Let us do some calculations - make us understands how and why it works.
You could improve the database part of the course a bit, it is a bit dry.»
16. Additional comments- Course was good but not that good as I expected»
- For a deeper understanding more in-depth lectures and or practicals are needed. The practicals really solidify some of the knowledge from the lectures, but honestly, the practicals are a bit too guided. Maybe one lecture should be spent on basic "how-to" for the different tools used in the practicals and then we are supposed to figure out on our own how to find answers to question - i.e. make it a bit more problem based. Now it"s just monkey-business going through step-by-step of the practicals.»
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|