ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Medicine for the engineer, SSY180, HT09

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-12-04 - 2010-01-03
Antal svar: 32
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 24%
Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

31 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 21 67%

Around 20 hours/week» 6 19%

Around 25 hours/week» 3 9%

Around 30 hours/week» 1 3%

At least 35 hours/week» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.48

- The course is over 2 quarters, more spred work.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- I found the course book very well made and interesting. Well picked.» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

31 svarande

0%» 1 3%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 5 16%

75%» 15 48%

100%» 10 32%

Genomsnitt: 4.06

- I read 3 courses in the quarter 2 , so I had some problem attending lectures in part b beacuse of different reasons (work load, hand-ins etc in the other 2 courses)» (50%)
- I couldn"t attend when the lecture was moved to a tuesday.» (75%)
- Very good lectures by all. Great to have lectureres from different fields.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

32 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 8 25%

The goals are difficult to understand» 1 3%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 11 34%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 12 37%

Genomsnitt: 2.84

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

28 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 2 7%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 24 85%

No, the goals are set too high» 2 7%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

30 svarande

No, not at all» 1 3%

To some extent» 19 63%

Yes, definitely» 5 16%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 5 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.46

- I would have liked a more general exam with slightly more complicated questions instead of a specific exam with very simple questions. Especially the second exam felt quite "random".» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

32 svarande

Small extent» 3 9%

Some extent» 6 18%

Large extent» 16 50%

Great extent» 7 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.84

- I think that some lecturers was very good and pedagogical ex lung lecturer and course examiner but some other goes through a lot of details and aren"t that pedagogical ex the gland lecturer» (Some extent)
- just for 2nd quarter. The 1st quarter"s lectures were boring.» (Large extent)
- Some were very good. Others not.» (Large extent)
- Most teachers were very good and inspiring. Very good that some teachers handed out the slides before the lecture. I wish that all of them did that. It is much easier to follow if one can make notes in the slides while listening.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

32 svarande

Small extent» 2 6%

Some extent» 10 31%

Large extent» 13 40%

Great extent» 7 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.78

- The textbook write in the way that is difficult to understand.» (Some extent)
- just for 2nd quarter.Because lecturers had very good presentations» (Large extent)
- I like the book. It explains everything very colorful!» (Large extent)
- I did not buy the book, but have studied it somewhat through friends. While I did not use it very much it seems like a very good textbook.» (Large extent)
- The book is very interesting and easy to read/understand. Has summarys and self quizes which is good.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

32 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 4 12%

Rather well» 21 65%

Very well» 7 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

- one of the cancelled lectures were not announced on the web page » (Rather badly)
- It would be better if the handouts were posted before the lectures. » (Rather badly)
- Some handouts were a bit poor, not really representative for what we are supposed to learn from the lectures and in swedish (Hornestam)» (Rather well)
- its better if you get the slides printed for you since you sometimes couldn"t print them before lectures,most lectures was added to the studieportal after the lecture. It is better if you have the slides before so you can bring them to the lecture. » (Rather well)
- In some cases the lecture notes did not come up directly it took almost 1 week in one case it tock like 2 weeks.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

32 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 2 6%

Rather good» 12 37%

Very good» 11 34%

I did not seek help» 7 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- At lectures good. Other times it might be hard.» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

32 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 1 3%

Rather well» 7 21%

Very well» 16 50%

I did not seek cooperation» 8 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.96

- We did not really have any cooperation moments in the course. » (I did not seek cooperation)

11. How was the course workload?

31 svarande

Too low» 1 3%

Low» 9 29%

Adequate» 16 51%

High» 5 16%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- I think that the requirements to pass were a bit low for a masters level course. Most noticable was the general attitude towards the course as being "easy" shown by both students and lecturers. A more challenging course would have been even more fun!» (Low)
- Low workload, but given that most students take this course on top of their ordinary programmes that feels just about right.» (Low)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

31 svarande

Too low» 1 3%

Low» 2 6%

Adequate» 9 29%

High» 12 38%

Too high» 7 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

- having 3 course, I just studied all the days» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

31 svarande

Poor» 1 3%

Fair» 2 6%

Adequate» 7 22%

Good» 16 51%

Excellent» 5 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

- It is very intresting and some of the teachhers is better than others. The areas is realy interesting as well.» (Good)
- Having a medicine course for engineers I think is a great idea. I hope it keeps going for a long time.» (Good)
- I liked the lectures a lot» (Good)
- for 2nd quarter only.» (Excellent)
- Very interesting course!» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The inspiring talks of people who are really interested in the subject. The handouts of the slides in beforehand.»
- Ralph peeker he was really good!»
- Dr.Skoglund because he presented Brain and Nervous system very well and interesting»
- This awesome course»
- The lectures and variety of lecturers.»
- Ralph Peeker was great!»
- The lectures about biochemistry, cells, tissues, urinary tract, endocrine system, reproductive system, muscles and skeleton was very good! »
- Ralph Peeker! An excellent teacher. »
- The textbook, which is very good and Ralph Peeker which is a very good tutor. »
- time slot.Should be 3 hours minimum per class.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Some handouts and slides(translate everything to English), it would be good if all of the slides were handed in beforehand. It would also be good if all of them had a summary of what we are supposed to know after the lectures.»
- More examples of exam questions should be shown so the students have an idea of what one should learn , it was hard to know how much one should read/learn since it was alout of details and different people that gave the lectures. One alternative is to say or give a paper oon what to learn, sort of a "punktlista" eg the summary on the first lecture in part a (biochemistry) was good, maybe one coudl do that for all lectures. »
- The lecture about CNS and PNS it was to slow and to much information to take in one can just take the most important parts and make it to just 2 lectures at the most!»
- Add homework»
- The course should hold itself in higher esteem, if that makes any sense. It is interesting and as high attendance, so I think it can also expect more from the students.»
- Don´,t rearrange the schedule all the time! »
- Mr Skoglund is very slow,he never had time to finnish is powerpoints. »
- The exam was very detailed questions, especially the second. Isn"t it better to understand the functions of the body parts instead the latin word for something? I think it was to much latin and to little of the other. I think the lectures about CNS were had too much details about names of parts. I also think the senses got to much questions on the exam, we didnot have any time to cover that part (because we talked about CNS all thouse lectures). »
- The lecture about terms was not so interesting -would be better to take some terms at each lecture instead.»
- Nothing that I can think of.»
- nothing specific»
- Lecture slides should be comprehensive.»

16. Additional comments

- This course is ver good and i really apreciate it.. Because Speciallist doctors teach us. They also teach their practical experiences.... So it is learning for us about human and it Closes me with GOD»
- I would be great if you can post on webpage earlier for the cancellation of class and not on the day of study (we are already waiting in the class).»
- Really interesting course»
- Putting the lectures in the evening worked very well for me, it"s easy to fit this course into the schedule. The exam session sadly turned into a bit of a joke. Two students next to me were allowed to have a low-toned discussion about each of the exam questions in hindi with no intervention from the supervisors, and I heard stories of the same happening in other rooms. I don"t think it is at all acceptabe for Chalmers to choose to overlook things like this...»
- It"s not really nicely done to have several exam questions on topics that were not addressed in the lectures. The eye for example.»
- This course would be possible to study on a distance, especially if it would be possible to add recordings from the lectures on the course page»
- Course contents are good but lectures material was not quite clear. No reasonable description of the slides just pictures. In some topics, even teacher didn"t prepare the lecture slides. Some lectures slides were in swedish language. On some occasions, students were not informed about the cancelled lectures. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från