|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Technological change & industrial transformation, ht 09, IDY040Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2009-12-09 - 2010-02-02 Antal svar: 49 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 68% Kontaktperson: Kathrine Jahnberg»
1. I am a student originally coming from,49 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.22 2. Of the lectures, I have attended,49 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.12 3. Overall the course was:*On a scale where 1 = very poor and 5 = very good49 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.18 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - Interesting but it felt like we discussed the same concepts at every lecture.» (4) 4. How much did you learn from the course?Please grade from 1-5 where:1= Nothing at all 5= Very much 48 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.91 - Much of the course felt like a repitition of things we"ve already learnt. » (3) 5. The structure of the course wasPlease grade from 1-5 where:1= Difficult to follow 5= Easy to follow 49 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.12 - Overally the course is not so tough. But some topics are a kind of hard to follow.» (3) 6. The pace of the course wasPlease grade from 1-5 where:1= Too slow 5= Too fast 49 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.22 - The time was really good allocated with the exam early, and time to write on the paper afterwards, also, since all literature has been covered I felt that the paper got more quality» (3) 7. The administration of the course wasPlease grade from 1-5 where:1= Very poor 5= Very good 49 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.06 - Easy and quick contact» (4) 8. Did the course meet your expectations?Please grade from 1-5 where:1= Not at all 5= Very much 49 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.06 - In some aspects the course outweigh my expectations and in some others it just didn"t met them.» (4) 9. How demanding was the course?Please grade from 1-5 where:1= Not demanding at all 5= Very demanding 48 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - The demanding thing is the scientific paper. But in the end it was worthy to work on it.» (3) 10. How difficult was the coursePlease grade from 1-5 where:1= Not difficult at all 5= Very difficult 49 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.28 - The main contents were not so hard to understand. And the lecturer was good at explaining things using his own experiences.» (3) 11. Did the examination form mirror the course content?Please grade from 1-5 where:1= Not at all 5= Very much 48 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.39 - I didn"t take the exam yet.» (?) 12. Did the examination form give opportunities for reflection and learning?Please grade from 1-5 where:1= Not at all 5= Very much 48 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.1 - I didn"t take the exam yet.» (?) 13. Overall the supervision of writing the scientific paper wasPlease grade from 1-5 where:1= Not good 5= Very good Matrisfråga - Magnus is really great, best supervisor I"ve had!» Staffan Jacobsson
Genomsnitt: 4.82 Hans Hellsmark
Genomsnitt: 3.77 Magnus Holmén
Genomsnitt: 4.55 Daniel Ljungberg
Genomsnitt: 2.5 Eugenia Perez
Genomsnitt: 4.4 14. How did you perceive your lecturer"s (Staffan Jacobsson"s) competence on this topic?Please grade from 1-5 where:1= Very poor 5= Very good 49 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.91 - He was very into policies.» (4) 15. How did the lecturer (Staffan Jacobsson) present the information?Please grade from 1-5 where:1= Very badly 5= Very well 49 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.36 - Feels like he needs some more examples, not only the development of cellular phones.» (4) 16. How was the lecturer"s (Staffan Jacobsson"s) commitment and interest?Please grade from 1-5 where:1= Not good 5= Very good 49 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.77 - Vissa föreläsningar bra, vissa utan entusiasm» (4) 17. How did you perceive you lecturer"s (Eugenia Perez) competence on this subject?Please grade from 1-5 where:1=Very poor 5=Very good 43 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.25 - Did not attend that lecture.» (?) 18. How did the lecturer (Eugenia Perez) present the information?Please grade from 1-5 where:1=Very poor 5=Very good 43 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.69 - Did not attend that lecture.» (?) 19. How was the lecturer"s (Eugenia Perez) commitment and interest?Please grade from 1-5 where:1=Very poor 5=Very good 43 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.09 - Did not attend that lecture.» (?) 20. For the course as a whole, too little or too much attention was paid to?- I think little attention to the practical (industrial) use of the knowledge we gathered. Course was quite theoretical indeed.»- I want to say the attention was put in suitable places in the topics.» - I think it was a great balance» - Too little attention was paid to show the differences between clusters and innovation systems.» - Too much on policies. » - It was ok, medium attention which was paid, not too much or too less work.» - It was really good.» - To little attetion to he difference between cluster and innovation system, the concepts overlap and some times were blury when we were talking on he lecture about it.» - God attention» - Too little to write examination, how to deal with the exam sucesfuly.» - I think everything was quite balanced.» - More attention can be paid to connecting the meso discussions with micro, i.e. firm level. Sometimes hard to see connections» - normal» 21. Reflections on the usefulness of writing an academic paper?- It was very useful and meaningful for us to write a scientific paper with the help and advices from supervisor. The lecturer gave us a lot of free to choose topics based on our interest. Even our topic was kind of out of the main area of the course, the lecturer encouraged us to follow and find something related.»- Useful, but it was really hard to chose a subject. Would have been good with some restrictions.» - We learnt a lot! Good that you got to chose subject yourself.» - I really learn how to write properly.» - I do not know really what I have learned form writing the paper. » - Should have more time and space for this task.» - Both fun, interesting and challanging. » - I learned a lot from writing scientific paper process both for theoretical skills in the content an the writing skills.» - It was funny. We have never done anything like that before. » - A good experience» - It was very useful, but it is quite difficult to do it in group. But still it was good experience!» - Good!» - Good with another kind of paper that differed from the other hundreds of cases written during the program..» - Very useful to future works, good supervision and lectures related.» - Good, but the lecture of "how to write an academic paper" would be better to have in the course "managing development projects" since the paper written in that course also was very academic. » - Interesting to write an article. First time» - I think is very useful to do this kind of projects because it does not only provide us aditional information about a specific topic but also give us the opportunity to improve our writing skills.» - The first time we do it with proper instructions, quite interesting.» - Usefull, but we have already done such writings» - Fun for a change to be able to choose you"re own topic. It trains the creative and analytical mind.» - very good» 22. Reflections on the supervision for writing an academic paper?- Magnus was knowledgeable and willing to help. Supervision meetings did a lot of help.»- Really really good supervision!!!» - We got a lot of support from our supervisor.» - I could be helpfull to have more meeting with the supervisor» - Really good that we handed in advance and got commented in word and sentback in advance of supervision so we got time to think of questions » - We had two different supervisors. When we had eour second meeting our supervisor was jetlagged. The system with only two supervisions is not clear enough, and by the way, it is NOT working!! Students who have supervisors down at departments belonging to the MEI-programme get hours of supervisions. People I have talked to have had approximately over 5 hours of supervisions. Put that it contrast wit your concept that it is one supervision only on the abstract (30 min) and one on the draft (30 min). The system is slightly unfair. Make it more clear that it is only two supervisions that is allowed and take away the rules of twhat should be discussed, life is not fair, don"t punish the ambitious.» - Extremely good supervision from Magnus Holmén.» - Very good, the best supervision I have had in any course. It is rare to get so extensive comments and opportunity for discussing during the writing process.» - My supervisor which is Steffan helped us very much.» - It was good.» - Good» - Great!» - Very good and useful.» - Very good with the guidance to state a clear purpose» - It was extremely useful because our supervisor gave us a lot of tips and good ideas that help to improve our paper.» - Very good.» - Very good suervision with Staffan» - very good. not only gave guidelines and general supervision but also drove us to think for ourselves.» - good» 23. Are there overlaps with other courses and, if so, please point these out and evaluate whether or not the overlaps were negative.- This course had some overlaps with Magnus"s course "Economics of Innovation". But I think the overlaps are not negative as the lecturers explain in different ways and their own insights. It is okay.»- I think it is good with some overlaps, it is not a problem.» - It was going to overlap the examination with a quiz from CNB, but they changed the CNB quiz, try to prevent this from the beginning.» - Yes, there are overlaps. Both from the Ekonomisk Analys 3 (I3) with Ove Granstrand and Economics of Innovation with Magnus Holmén. » - Yes there was, but I think the teachers solved this in a very good manner.» - Yes there are, regarding technology/innovation life cycles. I think it"s good since you get a reminder and can connect the different subjects.» - There are some overlaps with the course Technical Change and the Environment, but these are beneficial and one of the reasons why I choose the course.» - Yes, we had a lot of work on the other course, and we somehow did not have that much time for this course.» - Yes, there is overlaps. I think overlaps help to connect things that finally form a whole structure. Absolutely positive » - No» - With Economics of Innovation but I think is useful and positive.» - Some overlaps to the economics of innovation course, but nothing negative.» - there were some overlap with other courses, but it felt excellent since it was presented in other perspectives thus complementing previous knowledge. » - There were some overlpas but it was not negative at all because it helped me to get a better understanding about different topics.» - There are a lot of overlaps in general in the MEI program unfortunately. » - It overlaps with economics of innovation a great deal. But I didn"t think it was negative. The course can maybe dig a little deeper into the topic-» 24. Comments on the course literature?- Energy papers can be replaced by some more basic but comprehensive ones.»- The course literature was good. The lectures and literature were related and useful to understand the content better.» - Would have been good if we could have bought printed articles.» - Good literature, can be expanded by having more about innovation system where it is more explicit.» - Good articles and a suitable amount to read.Qualtity instead of quanity. Thank you» - Some articles were very long, the shorter ones where often better, more precise. » - Good choice not to have a book. I think the corse could handle a couple of more articles, however not that long articles. I feel that the long articles often not add too much value. Add more 10 pages articles instead. They tend to express stuff more clearly.» - First time ever I read all articles from start to end, very interesting and good choices!» - Sometimes, the articles were really hard to read and to catch the main ideas. » - It might be a bit extense but pertinent though» - Good» - The date switch for the examination and the article worked very well» - Quite interesting.» - Course literature was good, some articles are obviously (as always) not that interesting. I would have preferred to get the articles in a compendium, rather than have to write all of them out. » - Good articles» - Good course and fun with the academic paper» - he has lots of knowledge.» 25. What other comments or recommendations would you make for a future course?- Maybe, I am not sure, that students can handin the papers earlier and give presentations to the class. I think it will be meaningful.»- Have more different examples of clusters will be helpfull.» - Change the rules for supervision. » - More time for the scientific paper (4-5000 words is too short as well). More articles and shorter ones. Good to have such a clear connection to the course literature on the lectures as well. » - state each lecture "learning objective" clearly please. It would have helped (me at least) to understand and learn better in the end. » - Congratulation to Prof. Staffan Jacobsson, thanks for the lectures and your enthusiasm. I really learned during this course.» - Nothing» - Excellet course!!! :)» - Litterature Seminars to make students read and reflect more on course litterature.» - Point out clearly that it is a 3 hour exam and also maybe dig a little deeper into the topic.» Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.18 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.79 * obligatoriska frågor
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57%