Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Power electronic solutions for power systems, ENM100

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-12-07 - 2010-01-24
Antal svar: 17
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 44%
Kontaktperson: Valborg Ekman»
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

17 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 11%
Around 20 hours/week»4 23%
Around 25 hours/week»8 47%
Around 30 hours/week»2 11%
At least 35 hours/week»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.76

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

17 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 5%
75%»5 29%
100%»11 64%

Genomsnitt: 4.58

- missed some due to collisions» (75%)
- Two or three missed classes. » (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

17 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 5%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 11%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»14 82%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

16 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»16 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

16 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 12%
Yes, definitely»11 68%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.06

- Exam didn"t cover all parts.» (To some extent)
- The exam included exactly what we had been doing during the course.So if you followed the course and did what you were suppose to do then the exam would be no problem.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»6 35%
Great extent»11 64%

Genomsnitt: 3.64

- The teaching was so systematic,he(Massimo)had well organize the topic. Which should learn first and next. It was really great.» (Great extent)
- Lecturer is good conveying his ideas...» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»2 11%
Some extent»2 11%
Large extent»4 23%
Great extent»9 52%

Genomsnitt: 3.17

- Haven"t read the suggested text book (but I bought it)» (Small extent)
- The preparation for the examination and the assignments was more based on lecture slides rather than the bibliography.» (Some extent)
- The OH slides are very important but you need to attend to class to be able to use them since there are lists of alternative solutions but in reality only some are working. Not clear for persons that havn"t been in class!» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

17 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»8 47%
Very well»9 52%

Genomsnitt: 3.52

- Really nice with the handsouts and that we had space to add own comments and things that the teacher said during the lecture.» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

17 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»17 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- The teacher did a really nice job on this one, allways tried to help out even if the question was basic knowledge.» (Very good)
- Tarik is very helpful. Massimo as well but you need to be able to hear that you are stupid if you ask him. » (Very good)
- except lab session, because we did"t have enough time and I recommend you to specified a bit more time for laboratory. » (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

17 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 11%
Rather well»6 35%
Very well»9 52%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.41

- Felt like we were doing the assignments seperately which unfortunatley has to do with language difficulties for my partner. » (Rather poorly)

11. How was the course workload?

17 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»15 88%
High»2 11%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

- Perfect workload» (Adequate)
- I would say a bit low, but still with this workload the objectives are reached. I would enjoy to do an additional assignment like a reactive compensation study or harmonic study.» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 6%
Adequate»11 68%
High»2 12%
Too high»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.31

- Low compared to prevoius study periods, can be due to the fact that the other couse that I took didnt require that much work» (Low)
- I had 3 courses but it was OK.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

16 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»5 31%
Excellent»11 68%

Genomsnitt: 4.68

- Interesting.» (Good)
- One of the best courses that i have taken» (Excellent)
- To have a overview on FACTS and HVDC is a good course. However, the interesting thing is in controllers, so I would suggest to have a second course in this matter.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The computer assignments were really good, they should be preserved»
- Same course structure with the same teacher, Massimo He is really great teacher.»
- The way that the computer assignments were handled. Perfect time and good workload, you had to think but you didnt have to rush through it just to pass. »
- Computer assignments and Tarik.»
- Everything»
- The way to teach. good cooperation between students and lecturer in class it was really good.»
- every thing»
- every thing»
- All is well»
- lectures with massimo, labs, tutorials, »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- may be little more examples, like tutorials»
- Nothing..»
- The lecture with Series compensating devices, no doubt that Lennart is one of the greatest within this field but there were too much things to listen too and he rushed through the lecture in order to have time to say everything. I prefer that Massimo will handle either the lecture or what should be presented. Otherwise nice to meet a guy that has alot of knowledge withing one field.»
- Improved OH slides that are more clear when listing ways to solve problems. »
- I think it would be good to prepare one special assignment. Professor should design this.»
- Time of laboratory, it would be better to have a bit more time for participants. »
- I will prefer if the students are made to build at least one control circuit.»
- if a guest lecturer is to be invited, a little pre explanation»
- All is well»
- the software for lab assignments»

16. Additional comments

- I liked this course and way of teaching. really teacher was well elaborated and he has excellent grip on this subject»
- Great course, great teacher and a really fun course to take. Good job on this one!»
- Good lecturer. Tutor must improve his "teaching" skills.»
- The exam was not followed the old exams. In previous exams calculative questions were more tham theoretic question. It made some dismanage in my prepration for exam,But please continue this way 50% calculative and 50% theoretic it seems very efficient.»
- Well organised course»

Kursutvärderingssystem från