ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Power electronics converters, ENM060

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-12-07 - 2010-01-24
Antal svar: 25
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 33%
Kontaktperson: Valborg Ekman»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

24 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 8%
Around 20 hours/week»5 20%
Around 25 hours/week»4 16%
Around 30 hours/week»11 45%
At least 35 hours/week»2 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

24 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 4%
50%»2 8%
75%»8 33%
100%»13 54%

Genomsnitt: 4.37

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

24 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 4%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 4%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»10 41%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»12 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

24 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 4%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»21 87%
No, the goals are set too high»2 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.04

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

24 svarande

No, not at all»2 8%
To some extent»12 50%
Yes, definitely»8 33%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.41

- the only negative point of this course was examination, it was not covering all material and learning objectives. the questions should be included easy, regular and hard questions but it was not like that, the questions were above regular» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

24 svarande

Small extent»3 12%
Some extent»7 29%
Large extent»10 41%
Great extent»4 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.62

- perfect teaching method» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

24 svarande

Small extent»2 8%
Some extent»7 29%
Large extent»13 54%
Great extent»2 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.62

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

24 svarande

Very badly»1 4%
Rather badly»1 4%
Rather well»19 79%
Very well»3 12%

Genomsnitt: 3

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

24 svarande

Very poor»1 4%
Rather poor»2 8%
Rather good»8 33%
Very good»12 50%
I did not seek help»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.41

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

24 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 8%
Rather well»8 33%
Very well»13 54%
I did not seek cooperation»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

11. How was the course workload?

24 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 4%
Adequate»10 41%
High»8 33%
Too high»5 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

- but reasonable» (High)
- With all the preparing for the pspice exercises, there was no time left when I could have solved the problems in the course book. Allthough the pspice exercises was very good!» (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

24 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 4%
Adequate»8 33%
High»8 33%
Too high»7 29%

Genomsnitt: 3.87

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

24 svarande

Poor»1 4%
Fair»1 4%
Adequate»9 37%
Good»10 41%
Excellent»3 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Lab exercises »
- 3 phase converters»
- The demonstrations were good and the demonstration handouts were very helpful.»
- everything except examination»
- Pspice assignments. Tutorials- the explanation in them were really good.»
- more extensive handouts»
- tutorials»
- Powerpoint slide of the lecture»
- pspice labs»
- teaching should be made more meaningful and practical»
- The very good tutorials with the exellent solutions, which was very easy to follow and the reason behind each important step was explained in a very pedagogical way. The assignments were very good and helped in understanding imporant things about the different converters. Maybe some hints could be given of how to solve some of the home assignments.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The P Spice labs were on the same day that the demonstrations were done. This was a big problem as we had to do the home assignments for the P spice labs on our own and it took a lot of time, which in turn made a rather easy job very burdening. It should be taken care that the demonstration relevant to the P spice lab is done at least one day before the lab.»
- the exam problems was not standard in my opinion. »
- Most of the lecture slides depict figures from the book. They are a good source of the course to be studied. But it would be more helpful if each figure is accompanied by a few main points to be remembered.»
- Handouts»
- some extra pspice exercise regarding to three phase »
- To large step between 2p and 5p on the optional mid term exam. Better with 1p steps from -2p to 5p. Good with minus point if the effort is bad.»

16. Additional comments

- This course take much more time than the other courses which I had before but I will not be satisfied with exam result »
- th teachers and tutorial men are so knowledgeable and helpful but the final exam was not so good»
- descriptive handouts»
- subject seems to be more imaginative and non practical efforts should be made to be more practical and understandable »
- The lectures, tutorials and assignments were very good. Especially Andreas Karvonen was one of the most pedagogic exercise assistants I have met on Chalmers. Also he did a wonderful job uploading new corrected versions of the solutions (which from a pedagogical view were extreamly well written) as soon as an error was found.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från