ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

High voltage engineering, MTT035

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-12-07 - 2010-01-24
Antal svar: 29
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 44%
Kontaktperson: Valborg Ekman»
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

29 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 6%
Around 20 hours/week»7 24%
Around 25 hours/week»8 27%
Around 30 hours/week»10 34%
At least 35 hours/week»2 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

29 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 3%
50%»1 3%
75%»8 27%
100%»19 65%

Genomsnitt: 4.55

- Some of the lectures collided with other stuff I had to attend, but overall more or less everything.» (75%)
- I think maybe you can put the paper before the class for international student because of our language problem.» (75%)
- I really appreciate the lecturer efforts during the course but I just have a suggestion: why the teacher waste his energy and class time on writing text on the board instead of using modern ways of presentation like other teachers? » (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

29 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 3%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 3%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 20%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»21 72%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

- The approach of refering to the course objectives every now and then by the teacher is appreciated» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)
- I would like to appreciate the course examiner who keeps remind us about the course goals.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

28 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»2 7%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»25 89%
No, the goals are set too high»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 1.96

- The lectures were hard to understand in the beginning because we (högskoleingenörer) hadn"t done the course (flervariabelanalys) as recomended.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

28 svarande

No, not at all»1 3%
To some extent»9 32%
Yes, definitely»18 64%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- the exam seemed very focused on just a few areas» (To some extent)
- A tricky thing here is probably the fact of the time constraint of this exam, as it was a very big exam with a lot to do in only four hours and thus a big part of the exam result reflect how fast you calculate and write and not only how well you do it.» (Yes, definitely)
- too much tutorial really» (Yes, definitely)
- There was more focuse in the lab part. two question in the exam was about the lab which I think more than what expected.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. How well did you find the course structure?

29 svarande

Very badly»1 3%
Rather badly»2 6%
Rather well»16 55%
Very well»10 34%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- It should be good to have a compendium instead of an expensive book, and written by the teacher, which contents only the important things for the exams. Or slides, to have a beter support for figures.» (Rather well)
- I would propose numbering of lectures and tutorials, since they sometimes are moved around» (Rather well)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

29 svarande

Small extent»3 10%
Some extent»8 27%
Large extent»14 48%
Great extent»4 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.65

- I didn"t bought the book, because I would use it only for 2 months» (Small extent)
- didn"t buy the book. I leran better when I"m listening.» (Small extent)
- the lecture material was not optimal» (Some extent)
- The book is a bit tricky to use as a source for new information, however it works great as rehearsal etc in combination with all the other material available.» (Great extent)

8. To what extent has the lectures been of help for your learning?

29 svarande

Small extent»2 6%
Some extent»5 17%
Large extent»13 44%
Great extent»9 31%

Genomsnitt: 3

9. To what extent has the tutorials been of help for your learning?

29 svarande

Small extent»5 17%
Some extent»10 34%
Large extent»9 31%
Great extent»5 17%

Genomsnitt: 2.48

- Tutorials should be improved a little bit, may be the way of delivery of tutorials can be improved.» (Some extent)
- Sometimes the solution of the exercice is not very clear, or explained correctly» (Some extent)

10. To what extent has the laboratory exercises been of help for your learning?

29 svarande

Small extent»2 6%
Some extent»6 20%
Large extent»11 37%
Great extent»10 34%

Genomsnitt: 3

- did not attened» (Small extent)

11. To what extent has the trial exam been of help for your learning?

29 svarande

Small extent»9 31%
Some extent»8 27%
Large extent»6 20%
Great extent»6 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.31

- I did not know there was a trial exam until some week after it was done.» (Small extent)
- did not attened» (Small extent)
- Good trial exam, I answered small extent because I know how to resolve Gauss problems for 4 years , I think the trial exam should put the emphasize on most important things (Townsend mechanism ...)» (Small extent)
- The question on the trialexam was nothing like the problems which were solved on the tutorials. It should have been a task involving solving electric fields for different geometries, using gauss etc.» (Small extent)
- it achieved the goal: "Oh , I need to study hard for this subject.. !!" and that was helpfull. » (Large extent)
- It would be nice with one trial exam later in the course, maybe about Over voltages» (Great extent)

12. To what extent has the it been useful to use ebooks as a complement to the course text book?

29 svarande

Small extent»7 24%
Some extent»7 24%
Large extent»9 31%
Great extent»6 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.48

- did not use» (Small extent)
- I didn"t know there where ebooks» (Small extent)
- didn"t read any» (Small extent)
- Its easier to search items in an e-book. But the book itself is not very easy to understand. Maybe some compendium can be written for easier understanding.» (Large extent)

13. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

29 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»3 10%
Rather well»14 48%
Very well»12 41%

Genomsnitt: 3.31

- It"s a pity we could not visit the substation, thus should be very interesting to see in "real" what we study in classes.» (Rather well)

Study climate

14. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

29 svarande

Very poor»1 3%
Rather poor»2 6%
Rather good»6 20%
Very good»19 65%
I did not seek help»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 3.58

- especially for the lectures» (Very good)
- Although, "study climate" as it is in class is not good at all. This is because almost everyone else is talking loudly and have their telephones ringing all the time. All time low on Chalmers! Every class was a disaster in this way, even when you told people to shut up they didnt. It was extra intense during tutorials when the rudeness went to offensive behaviour at many points. Also, half the class where late at EVERY class, sometimes up to 30-40 minutes late. This is typical for big masters-classes where some foreign students and some students from Lindholmen don´,t their studies seriously and ruins it for those who do. It should be discussed and rules should be set in the beginning of the period, and misbehaviour should get people kicked from the class. Teachers must be harder on telling people to shut up.» (Very good)

15. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

29 svarande

Very poorly»1 3%
Rather poorly»4 13%
Rather well»5 17%
Very well»17 58%
I did not seek cooperation»2 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.51

- Se above.» (Rather poorly)

16. How was the course workload?

29 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 6%
Adequate»11 37%
High»15 51%
Too high»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 3.51

- Varied a lot, but around the time the labs were performed it was rather hectic.» (High)

17. How was the total workload this study period?

29 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 3%
Adequate»10 34%
High»7 24%
Too high»11 37%

Genomsnitt: 3.96

Summarizing questions

18. What is your general impression of the course?

29 svarande

Poor»1 3%
Fair»2 6%
Adequate»5 17%
Good»13 44%
Excellent»8 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.86

- the teaching method was not so good.» (Poor)
- Powerpoint slide please» (Adequate)
- One thing that would be nice is some additional information on how to solve the questions for the home assignment before laborations as I believe people would get more out of doing them if they have more of an idea of what they are doing rather than just using formulas as I noticed a lot of people did.» (Good)
- too much tutorial» (Good)
- Except for what I´,ve mentioned before this is a great class with great teachers.» (Excellent)

19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- All contents except thermal stresses»
- Tutorial problems- they were very helpful in clearing some of the concepts. Both lab experiments were very well structured. Also, the lab handouts were extremely helpful.»
- the same way of teaching it has helped a lot in learning»
- the labs, the substation visit»
- the labs.»
- NC»
- The labs»
- less tutorial and more usefulthing»
- Some more practical tutorial especially about surge arresters.»
- lecturer for the course , labs should be more in sessions rather than 2 larger once ,subject should be more practical than this year !»

20. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Beside the examination, please include a Project work consisting of Designing a High Voltage Substation. And the project could be 20-30% of the final grade.»
- The way of presenting lectures .( using modern ways instead of chalk and board)»
- Thermal and mechanical stresses should be reduced»
- A better tutor for the tutorials would be good, now there were mistakes, talking into the board instead of with the students and such.»
- tutor»
- the tutorials are really too slow. I think the final exam should better focus on the lectures instead of the labs.»
- students should not write the entire lecture all the time and it should be given as handouts.»
- tutor.»
- NC»
- The timetable for the labs (don"t have them on the same week)»
- I think the part which is talking about the mechanical and thermal stress shall be removed. In fact this subject is totally isolated from the course subject. Instead more lectures shall be served for the insulation coordination or expand more in TRV concept. »
- the totorial tutor should make better his way of delivering knowledge to student. »
- Tutorial assistant was rather inexperienced and has no command on class,he should be changed , if the lecturer would issue a compendium for students rather it may very useful to the upcoming engineers of this course»
- classroom climate, people cant be late and have to shut up. »

21. Additional comments

- It would be better if the study trip to the substation omitted from course PM which was not planned to go.»
- Visit to substation should be arranged for the coming years»
- Thommas should explain things more clearly. Also, he should look at the students more while explaining. Otherwise, it becomes difficult to follow what he is saying.»
- Please arrange a study visit for the students»
- NC»
- I would like to thank the course examiner for his effort in deliver the course in very intersting and infrmative manner. I like his way of teaching and intracting with student. Also I would like to thank the totorial asistance for his effort in solving the totorial problems. »
- Jörgen Belnow thought the subject very well , he used to explain course goals more frequently with the help of a meaningful diagram after completion of every topic . the only problem we had faced this time was tutorial assistant !»

Kursutvärderingssystem från