ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Course evaluation Supply Chain Management, TEK185

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-11-23 - 2009-12-02
Antal svar: 34
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 47%
Kontaktperson: Ola Hultkrantz»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Industriell ekonomi 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

34 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 2%
Around 20 hours/week»4 11%
Around 25 hours/week»5 14%
Around 30 hours/week»13 38%
At least 35 hours/week»11 32%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- Kursen motsvarade inte 15hp enligt mig» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

34 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»15 44%
100%»19 55%

Genomsnitt: 4.55

- most time are spent on group work,I learned a lot from it» (75%)
- Inte Gaddes föreläsningar. Väldigt oinspirerande» (75%)
- few classes were extremely boring and almost felt asleep.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

33 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 3%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 3%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»15 45%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»16 48%

Genomsnitt: 3.39

- Maybe it due to my English is limited, so sometimes i feel a little bit confused» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- Inte tydligt i PM att alla PM var obligatoriska» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

32 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»3 9%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»28 87%
No, the goals are set too high»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 1.93

- Much of the course material was repeating concepts from earlier I-courses.» (No, the goals are set too low)
- But don´,t add things just because people says it is good.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

33 svarande

No, not at all»3 9%
To some extent»17 51%
Yes, definitely»13 39%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

34 svarande

Small extent»2 5%
Some extent»10 29%
Large extent»21 61%
Great extent»1 2%

Genomsnitt: 2.61

7. To what extent has the "The Red Book" (Skjott-Larsen et al.) text book been of help for your learning?

33 svarande

Small extent»4 12%
Some extent»6 18%
Large extent»18 54%
Great extent»5 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

- Covers the right things, but is not that well written. Explanations are often more confusing than they have to.» (Some extent)

8. To what extent has the text book "Embracing Change" been of help for your learning?

34 svarande

Small extent»24 70%
Some extent»8 23%
Large extent»2 5%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.35

- Didn"t read it at all.» (Small extent)
- I did not open it.» (Small extent)
- Not referred that much when compared to other books» (Small extent)
- I"m sure it"s good, I just didn"t have time to read that one too!» (Small extent)
- Hde varit bra att få ut den i sommar, så man kunde läsa innan kursen börjar då den ger överblick» (Small extent)
- Does not really cover the subject in detail, but is very pleasant to read and well written.» (Large extent)

9. To what extent has the "Gadde and Håkansson" text book been of help for your learning?

34 svarande

Small extent»10 29%
Some extent»15 44%
Large extent»6 17%
Great extent»3 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.05

- I liked it, but didn"t have time too read as much as I would have liked. » (Some extent)
- Det känns lite politiskt laddat att välja sin egen bok och föreläsa om enbart den när kursen är menad till att ge en allmän bild över inköp och Supply Chain.» (Some extent)
- Very good book (should not be judged by its cover, looks very booring). Easy to understand, but giving deapth and interesting reflections and new angles.» (Great extent)
- Nice book!» (Great extent)

10. To what extent has the Journal articles, and other complimentary material that has been handed out. been of help for your learning?

34 svarande

Small extent»9 26%
Some extent»15 44%
Large extent»10 29%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.02

- Didn"t have time to read all of those. » (Small extent)

11. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

34 svarande

Very badly»1 2%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»19 55%
Very well»14 41%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- Slides before lectures are always appreciated» (Rather well)
- The main problem with the course was the very low level of communication and academic skills of some of the participants. If you were unlucky with the groups there was a possibility that you were the only one contributing to the final report/work, a scenario which shouldnt be the case.» (Rather well)
- The schedule has been changed for many times.» (Rather well)

Course structure and content

12. How do you perceive the following parts of the course? Please give some brief comments if you rank any part as less than good.

Matrisfråga

- The lectures from Gadde felt like it was only read directly fro the book and no extra explenations.»
- The BCG case is just additional work load but doesn"t add anything to the course as a whole.»
- The idea of having host companies are great, ours just wasn"t that suitable.»
- The BCG case was an intresting case, but it didn"t have a good connection to the course.»
- 5 minutes for term paper presentation is not enough»
- I have no interest in the construction industry at all.And also as an international student, i am not particularly inclined towards the swedish construction business»
- Too many assignments! We didn"t have time to do them properly. Better with a few of more importance... »
- I could not find any relation between SCM and Boston case competition!»
- I guess it was better if Ola himself had chosen the group members...In my group no one was motivated to take the case seriously. ( As I didn"t know many people I was just in a group by chance)»
- It was unclear wether the case competition was mandatory, why you tended to not perform your best if you hadn"t intended to participate from the beginning.»
- lectures on processes are perceived as rather poor because there is only one course about it since it will be studied more accurately in the following semesters.»
- Gaddes lecture were really boring and many students feel the same.guess the subject needs to be made more interesting»
- BCG hade ingen tydlig koppling till SCM. Bra med betygsättning på Individuellt TP. »

Lectures on SCM
34 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 2%
Rather good»26 76%
Very good»7 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.17

Lectures on Processes (Transport, Production, Information, Reverse Logistics and Distribution))
34 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»3 8%
Rather good»27 79%
Very good»4 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.02

Lectures on Supply Management
34 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»3 8%
Rather good»27 79%
Very good»4 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.02

Lectures on Management Issues
33 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»3 9%
Rather good»27 81%
Very good»3 9%

Genomsnitt: 3

Guest Lectures
34 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»3 8%
Rather good»26 76%
Very good»5 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

Supply Chain Game
34 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»15 44%
Very good»19 55%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

Host company/Seminar on SCM
34 svarande

Very poor»1 2%
Rather poor»3 8%
Rather good»13 38%
Very good»17 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

Seminar: Strategic Sourcing
33 svarande

Very poor»1 3%
Rather poor»6 18%
Rather good»19 57%
Very good»7 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.96

Purchasing and SCM in Construction
34 svarande

Very poor»3 8%
Rather poor»11 32%
Rather good»14 41%
Very good»6 17%

Genomsnitt: 2.67

Individual Term Paper
34 svarande

Very poor»1 2%
Rather poor»5 14%
Rather good»14 41%
Very good»14 41%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

The Boston Consulting Group SCM Case competition
34 svarande

Very poor»7 20%
Rather poor»6 17%
Rather good»11 32%
Very good»10 29%

Genomsnitt: 2.7

13. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

34 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»6 17%
Rather well»16 47%
Very well»12 35%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.17

- It is kind of hard when many of the exchange students don"t speak nor write good enough English. It often took more time to rework their parts or explain assignments to them than to do everything yourself. » (Rather poorly)
- large differnce in "quality" of students. In general, the english level of the exchange students seem to be quite poor.» (Rather poorly)
- Poor just with many of the Asian students, most of the swedish students are so much "better" in groups. » (Rather poorly)
- Det är ett lotto när man skall jobba med utbytesstudenter, de kan vara riktigt dåliga, vissa pratar inte ens engelska.» (Rather poorly)
- With most of the students it has worked very well but as written before the low level of communication and academic skills of some of the students were very hard if not impossible to work with.» (Rather well)
- Depend on each person"s personality, it varies.» (Rather well)

14. How was the course workload?

34 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»13 38%
High»17 50%
Too high»4 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.73

- Lots of assignments where you had to work with students with inadequate language skills.» (High)
- I came to Chalmers with a foreign background and the course started maybe too fast rate in the beginning of first week. Would be maybe 2-3 easier days before the "real" work. » (High)
- Too many assignments!» (Too high)
- 3 books with a lot of assignment, specially in first quarter when concepts are new, I think is too much!» (Too high)
- To many groupworks that consumed all time but still did not contribute as much as they could have. I would rather see less assignments and more time to dig in to the assignment instead.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

15. What is your general impression of the course?

34 svarande

Poor»1 2%
Fair»1 2%
Adequate»8 23%
Good»23 67%
Excellent»1 2%

Genomsnitt: 3.64

- Good introduction to the SCM program, but much repetition form earlier courses.» (Adequate)
- Intressting subject and good teachers!» (Good)
- According to what I learned and what I was expected, it was actually excellent, but when it comes to workload, it is "good".» (Good)
- Overall good, » (Good)

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The Guest lectures and the host company»
- Host Company»
- SC-game, BCG-case, guest lectures,»
- The term paper and the company visit.»
- Lectures including guest lecture.Seminars, it really help to understand the basic concept of supply chain»
- BCG case competition, host companies and the construction industry focus.»
- The mixed teaching with both lectures, seminars, host company visit and case work.»
- Supply Chain Game, Boston case, »
- The term paper. Hard in the beginning but a very good task!»
- scg, boston consulting case competition, Ola as a main teacher :D»
- term paper»
- The company visit»
- I believe that Host company visits, strategic sourcing, supply chain game should be kept as it is»
- Termpapaer»
- I liked supply chain game very much, and very good way to teach some concepts.»
- the assignments»
- the term paper»
- The supply chain game was a very good thing, overall i think most of the things was good»
- Host company visit. Term paper. Visitors from the business life. »
- game,case,individual term paper»
- Host Company»

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- no mandatory BCG competition»
- Course literature. A book that is almost 10 years old felt outdated from time to time»
- The preparation for the exam was non existent this year, which was very bad. Particularly for the international students who where not familiar with the "swedish" way of dealing with questions in the exam. This needs to be changed!»
- If possible, the red book.»
- Except my low score,however itäs my own problem,I really feel Ok with the course.»
- Remove the cumpulsory BCG case»
- Let ppl choose their own groups for some assignments and grade it. Remove the individual term paper, it was more of an academic exercise and did not feel very relevant.»
- Try to check the standards of the international students until next year.»
- Purchasing and SCM in Construction, I think it"s useless.»
- The construction case is Sweden focus, maybe it"s better to have a introduction about Sweden construction environment before the case.»
- strategic purchasing case with »
- skip the construction case»
- Purchasing»
- Consruction term paper. Didn"t put any effort into it all since it was only pass/fail. Everyone focused on their individual term papers.»
- Maybe cordinate the groups better, have one group instead of 3-4 different.»
- Construction industry guest lectures should be kept optional. More focus on manufacturing»
- It is too many assignments of no importance... »
- I guess everything was ok.»
- the case competition should not be mandatory»
- To many assignments. Its no reason to have so many assigments so you dont have the time to do them properly nor have the time to studie because of them. Just one assignment per part and maybe a little bigger one i think would be a better approach»
- construction case, seminar related, gaddes lectures»
- BCG, Strategic sourcing bör omarbetas, constructioncaset var väldigt ospecificerat.»

18. Additional comments

- The lecture of Reverse Logistic was not "deep" enough to my mind. It is a very interesting topic but rather unimportant in this course. That is a pity.»
- Have no more comments»
- Good course overall.»
- very happy with my termpaper teacher: Maria Lindholm, was a good support»
- Term paper was a disaster! Badly informed and terrible follow up!»
- I think the term paper also should be graded in studieportalen, because it is 30 % of the grade. I do not think it is fair that the exam only gives credit.»
- The theme about procurement in the scene of SCM is very good, but on the other hand it has a very theoretical approach. The part would be divided to one lesson of more practical purchasing issues and then continue to theoretical purchasing like relationships, networks etc. »
- the feedback with regard to assignments, etc were not provided at all or on time.this is important so that it would not be a surprise for students in the exam.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från