Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Nordic Master 2009 SJO360 Maritime Leadership, SJO360

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-11-17 - 2009-11-30
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Magda Wilewska-Bien»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

13 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 15%
Around 20 hours/week»5 38%
Around 25 hours/week»3 23%
Around 30 hours/week»2 15%
At least 35 hours/week»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.61

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

13 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 15%
75%»1 7%
100%»10 76%

Genomsnitt: 4.61

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

13 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 46%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 53%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

- I think the course title is misleading. The course is more about strategy than about leadership.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- The name of the course is highly misleading.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

13 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»13 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

13 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»13 100%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- I think it is a good way to present ones achievements. But it would be better to have both a doc and a ppt document instead of just ppt. » (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 7%
Large extent»3 23%
Great extent»9 69%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

- Competent external lecturer.» (Great extent)
- great lectures where the student can learn a lot. » (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 16%
Large extent»6 50%
Great extent»4 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- Some of the "mandatory" books where not needed. But could be of interest as additional reading.» (Some extent)
- "The strategy reader" was too diversified and the concept of having a book based on articles in an introduction course is not optimal. "Expansion - strategi för affärsutveckling" would most likely be a better choice but it was difficult to get hold of in Sweden. » (Some extent)
- Especially the presentations.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

13 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 15%
Rather well»6 46%
Very well»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

- Late comments from the teacher. He was only available via mail but not via PingPong.» (Rather well)
- It makes it easier to find the material when the teacher structures the contents under documents etc. » (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 7%
Very good»9 69%
I did not seek help»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 4.15

- See above: no activity on PingPong. » (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

13 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 15%
Very well»11 84%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

- Excellent cooperation in the tasks. » (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 53%
High»6 46%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

- I would suggest that the group consist of 2 students because than it is easier to divide the tasks between them. » (Adequate)
- High but in a good way.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 30%
High»8 61%
Too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

13 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»5 38%
Excellent»8 61%

Genomsnitt: 4.61

- Change name of the course it is not leadership» (Good)
- A very interesting subject. Valuable to have this course within the programme. » (Excellent)
- Very interesting course but the title should be adjusted. Great teacher.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Everything.»
- the task, the lectures.»
- Same teather.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Clerar course description and what are included in the exams»
- Nothing. Maybe cut one or two of the mandatory books. »
- also a word document. title of the course litterature in form of a book. »
- A new name at the course. For example Maritime Strategy.»
- name of the course, very misleading. it is very much important to decrease the number of "soft" subjects (human factors, research methods, environment).»
- The name of the course»

16. Additional comments

- Excellent course, especially the lectures. »
- Better explanation of the task in the course. »
- this is by far the best course in NMMM. not a lot of mumbojumbo »

Kursutvärderingssystem från