Visa resultat

Lp1 09/10 Leadership and teamwork, LBT812

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

27 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»		21		77%
Around 20 hours/week»		5		18%
Around 25 hours/week»		1		3%
Around 30 hours/week»		0		0%
At least 35 hours/week»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.25

- Just in Class.....And I think it is not the right way of making a question since your answers are all far away from reality. So, the result clearly would be the first choice.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- Few lectures » (At most 15 hours/week)
- Många inställda föreläsningar» (At most 15 hours/week)
- There were hardly any lectures at all and I did not start study for the exam until a couple of days prior to it.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- We did almost the exact same course in the first year at AE, that made this course a repetition and I didn"t feel that I needed to spend very much time on it.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- The teacher had class for 23 hours, and was sick for 19 hours.» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

27 svarande

0%»		0		0%
25%»		1		3%
50%»		7		25%
75%»		6		22%
100%»		13		48%

Genomsnitt: 4.14

- Because the course didn"t give me more than a repetition I felt it wasn"t important to attend in the lectures. » (25%)
- of them that toke place, many of them where canceled» (50%)
- The lectures were hard to follow due to some language problems, and not very inspiering lectures.» (50%)
- What if it was 90percent? » (75%)
- Most information in this course was tought to us in a course called Beteendevetenskap. So i fellt many times than i could learn more on my own my reading the course bokks.» (75%)
- But only 50% of the scheduled lectures were carried out. » (100%)
- Uppskattningsvis 50% Av föreläsningarna var inställda.» (100%)
- Think I missed one session.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

I have not seen/read the goals»		7		25%
The goals are difficult to understand»		5		18%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»		7		25%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»		8		29%

Genomsnitt: 2.59

- Or probably don"t remember them» (I have not seen/read the goals)
- The whole course fellt messy, like not even the teacher knew what he was doing!» (The goals are difficult to understand)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

26 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»		9		34%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»		16		61%
No, the goals are set too high»		1		3%

Genomsnitt: 1.69

- We have read almost the same material in the course bahaviour sience. This course felt more like repetition.» (No, the goals are set too low)
- Innehållet i kursen var väldigt lik kursen Beteendevetenskap som vi läste i årskurs 1» (No, the goals are set too low)
- This course are almost the sam as beteendevetenskapen in year 1. This was also something that we told the teacher, but without respons. » (No, the goals are set too low)
- My opinion is that we already have worked through thesee subjects in Beteendevetenskapskursen, there wasn"t anything new!!» (No, the goals are set too low)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

No, not at all»		3		11%
To some extent»		13		48%
Yes, definitely»		6		22%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»		5		18%

Genomsnitt: 2.48

- It does but still, it"s just what I learned my first year at Chalmers.» (Yes, definitely)
- still waiting for the result of the exam» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)
- Vet inte resultatet av tentan» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		16		59%
Some extent»		8		29%
Large extent»		3		11%
Great extent»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.51

- Almost everything the teacher said was from the course book. Even the examples the teacher came with was from the book and not from real experiences which I believe is easier to relate with.» (Small extent)
- where was he?» (Small extent)
- I learned most by study for the exam.» (Small extent)
- the teacher was absent or canceled almost 50% of the lessons. when he was there he said exakly the sametings that was written in the book and on the slides that he used during the lessons. the teaching was consistently without devotion. » (Small extent)
- I don"t think I"ve learned much in this course and I think it is really bad that you can have two almost identical courses in one education, I take loans and I expect that my time at chalmers should give me more than debts. » (Small extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		6		22%
Some extent»		6		22%
Large extent»		10		37%
Great extent»		5		18%

Genomsnitt: 2.51

- Did use some google books instead of prescribed literature. » (Small extent)
- No extend at al to be honest. I used the book from Beteendevetenskapen and the handouts froom the teacher. I would say that the book was unnessecary since I got the higest grade woithout even bying the book, which I acctually dont think is fare. » (Small extent)
- I learned most by doing the study questions for the exam. I did not buy the book because of the price. » (Large extent)
- The material and the literature was not enough to understand some parts. To understand those I had to look it up on the internet, which got too much time. Sometimes the described pages did not match the powerpoint slides.» (Large extent)
- The book was great, but could we use the same book as i behaivior sience?» (Great extent)
- That was the only reason that I learned anything at all.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

Very badly»		5		19%
Rather badly»		11		42%
Rather well»		9		34%
Very well»		1		3%

Genomsnitt: 2.23

- It took very long time until the material needed was out on the website.» (Very badly)
- The exam wasn"t registrated at all...» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

Very poor»		6		22%
Rather poor»		10		37%
Rather good»		10		37%
Very good»		0		0%
I did not seek help»		1		3%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- The teacher was away a lot and difficult to reach» (Rather poor)
- I did not need any help but my impression is that the teacher did not answer his mail.» (Rather poor)
- When the teacher was there it was good, but when we had seminar he just attended for the first 30 minutes. Futhermore, we did not have a oppertuinite to ask questions before the exam since the last session was canceld.» (Rather poor)
- The fact that the responsible teacher were sick a lot made it hard to reach him.» (Rather poor)
- Good at the lessons but very bad otherwise. There was hard to get contakt with the teacher other times. » (Rather good)
- I think I would have asked the teacher more questions if he had been more healthy. » (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

Very poorly»		3		11%
Rather poorly»		0		0%
Rather well»		12		44%
Very well»		9		33%
I did not seek cooperation»		3		11%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- We only had one group task during the hole course, this is pretty strange since the course is about leadership and teamwork. During 2,5 year on our program this is the course with the least teamwork so far. » (Very poorly)
- we didn´,t work together very mutch» (Rather well)
- no cooperation needed» (I did not seek cooperation)
- There was no need for cooperation since there wasn"t any teamwork or so. But as well when studing on our own hand we helped out and cooporated.» (I did not seek cooperation)

11. How was the course workload?

Too low»		4		14%
Low»		7		25%
Adequate»		14		51%
High»		2		7%
Too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.51

- because we already had good knowledge in the subject» (Too low)
- We didn"t learned anything new. When we started the course, we had around 40 hours sceduled, of those we only used 20 for teaching sessions. Moreover should we have 3 seminares, but we only had ONE! when missimg out of class we could heve been given some work to do or pages to read, I think it was way to little work for the number of credits.» (Too low)
- But I assume that is because the first course in behaviorial science already had handled the subject.» (Low)
- Since we had to learn almost everything our self» (High)
- A thick book and in english» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

Too low»		3		11%
Low»		3		11%
Adequate»		11		40%
High»		9		33%
Too high»		1		3%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

- I had a lot of spare time...» (Too low)
- But that since I read an extra course on another program. If only looking at the AE-program I would say it was too low. » (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

Poor»		12		44%
Fair»		6		22%
Adequate»		7		25%
Good»		2		7%
Excellent»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.96

- The teacher was absent a lot and the course is too similar to the behaviour sience course.» (Poor)
- I´,m very intrested in the subject, but this course was handeld poorley!» (Poor)
- Very few lectures and the ones that very wasn"t interesting. » (Poor)
- As said above, nothing new. I would rather have read another more informative course in any other subject, than just to waste my time.» (Poor)
- It was a very interesting course. Because of personal problems I found it hard to work at home. To work better directly from the start, it would be great with more questions to discuss.» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

16. Additional comments