Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Bio -/ Intellectual Property Strategies, TEK355/TEK056

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-11-04 - 2009-11-17
Antal svar: 15
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 23%
Kontaktperson: Anneli Hildenborg»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

15 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»0 0%
Around 25 hours/week»2 13%
Around 30 hours/week»4 26%
At least 35 hours/week»9 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.46

- Hard to tell - but it was about 3 hours / day outside the lectures» (Around 25 hours/week)
- It"s hard to separate what was a part of the IPS, and what were actually part of the TBE, so I added those hours together, resulting in a lot more than 35/week... That is a good thing though. » (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

15 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 6%
100%»14 93%

Genomsnitt: 4.93

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

15 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 13%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 26%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»9 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- Not followed up during the course» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

14 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»14 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- hard to answer » (?)
- Tough exam for non-law students» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)
- They are reasonable but doesn"t fit with the time line appropiately.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

15 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»8 53%
Yes, definitely»7 46%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.46

- 2nd question was bad, but i feel i could have shown much much more.» (To some extent)
- I really don"t like questions with too broad answers - they are good for checking knowledge, but they are time consuming and if you understand the question wrong you"ll fail» (To some extent)
- same as above» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 13%
Large extent»11 73%
Great extent»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Some lectures could have been removed or altered, like the AVA-Patent lecture didn´,t provide that much useful stuff. More Ulf Petrusson. » (Some extent)
- Varför fick vi inte reda på att Karnov fanns? Alla jurister verkar ha använt det, även Hermansson! » (Large extent)
- Ulf lessons were really good for inspiration, but the awapatent guy was a little boring I must say.» (Large extent)
- It gives direction to think.» (Large extent)
- I really liked the variety of lectures because of the different lecturers, e.g. Ulf talking about IP on a more strategic level and the Awapatent-guy talking about it on a very practical day-to-day level. You got to here everything on different levels. Very, very helpful in the learning process and I hope it continues this way. » (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 26%
Large extent»8 53%
Great extent»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.93

- To little IP-STRATEGY in levin, and too much focus on the actual law. The actual law you learn anyway. A more strategy focused book would help. » (Some extent)
- Varför fick vi inte reda på att Karnov fanns? Alla jurister verkar ha använt det, även Hermansson! » (Large extent)
- I read the whole book, it was really good.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

15 svarande

Very badly»1 6%
Rather badly»4 26%
Rather well»10 66%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- Information deficit, clarity, who owns what and who.» (Very badly)
- The slides was a mess (now fixed) and there were always problems where to send hand-ins.» (Rather badly)
- I am calling for some better organization of the files on GUL - like a folder for each course (the week system is fine). One folder per course would also make it easier to distinguish between the courses» (Rather badly)
- Somewhat unclear communication on assignments, when to submit, whom to submit to, what assignments are removed/altered etc.» (Rather badly)
- It was a very big improvement when the slides where sorted after every week on GUL. » (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

15 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 6%
Rather good»5 33%
Very good»9 60%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

- Too much focus on emailing the responsible person, Christoffer mostly, instead of getting a straight answer right away. If someone asks a question, a straight forward answer would beappreciated, instead of having to send an email. » (Rather poor)
- Christoffer did excellent work» (Rather good)
- Interactive lessons» (Very good)
- Christoffer was very helpful during his exercises. » (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

15 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 6%
Rather well»7 46%
Very well»7 46%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- but law students continue not sharing information to greater extent» (Very well)
- We had great study groups and shared information and summaries on chapters in the book and so on.» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

15 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 46%
High»8 53%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

- good pace, learned millions of things, good excercises. I liked the pace» (Adequate)
- The first weeks were actually a bit too slow, but once the TBE course started to pick up it was a lot, but in a good way. » (Adequate)
- It was high, but it should be» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 14%
High»11 78%
Too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

- As it should be, high.» (High)
- High, but expected» (High)
- I like high workload...» (High)
- High, but not too high. » (High)
- borderline too high.» (High)
- Considering the fact that you need some settling time initially,at later stage more work load can be handeled.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

15 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 6%
Good»9 60%
Excellent»5 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.26

- kul, bra fokus, dålig examination» (Good)
- If you compare with other courses this one really taught things that I can use in the future.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- övningar»
- Ulf lessons. They give great inspiration, which is crucial due to high paste.»
- The exercises (patent, copyright, design and trademark)»
- The variety of lecturers. Everything Ulf did. Christoffers exercises. »
- Lectures by Ulf Petrusson»
- Ulf Petrusson"s attitude towards IPS»
- The energy and enthusiam towards improvement.»
- The exercise, and the tutorial of the exercise. Must be much better! »
- The exercies and quizes gave an opportunity to assess overselves»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- ...struktur...»
- some lecturers are not good at all»
- The exam could include more, so you can show what you really know.»
- The awapatent guy might only need two hours. Where to send hand-ins and who is responsible for assignments is also important to sort out.»
- More structure (maybe hand ins?) during the first couple of weeks. »
- Communication on what to do, when to hand in, and what to hand in. »
- More extra exercises with proper answers for practice. »
- Holistic approach to IPS is really good as it is.»
- Moving around various campuses.»
- The tutoriala!»
- There were redundant patent lectures from different companies. This could have been used for more exercices.»

16. Additional comments

- Läs inte " äldreomsorgen i övre kågedalen" den är hemsk hemsk hemsk.»
- More Ulf Petrusson"s lectures!»
- Program is really good & satisfying but if some free time can be provided to realize the lessons invidually that would be of great help.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från