Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Applied Structural Dynamics 2009, TME140
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2009-11-03 - 2009-12-03 Antal svar: 22 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 36% Kontaktperson: Thomas Abrahamsson» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.22 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 2 | | 9% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 9 | | 40% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 8 | | 36% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 2 | | 9% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 1 | | 4% |
Genomsnitt: 2.59 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 22 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 1 | | 4% |
75%» | | 4 | | 18% |
100%» | | 17 | | 77% |
Genomsnitt: 4.72 - I attend seldom in the computer assignment» (75%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus given by the Course Poster gave the course goals in terms of learning outcomes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?22 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 2 | | 9% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 1 | | 4% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 6 | | 27% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 13 | | 59% |
Genomsnitt: 3.36 - Detailed learning outcomes would be good.» (The goals are difficult to understand)
4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.20 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 18 | | 90% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 2 | | 10% |
Genomsnitt: 2.1 - This is the firts course in dynamics that I have taken. I would appreciate if some basic course had been offered during the bachelor"s (Civil eng.).» (No, the goals are set too high)
5. Did the examination (assignments + written exam) assess whether you have reached the goals?22 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 7 | | 31% |
Yes, definitely» | | 13 | | 59% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 2 | | 9% |
Genomsnitt: 2.77
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?22 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 13% |
Large extent» | | 9 | | 40% |
Great extent» | | 10 | | 45% |
Genomsnitt: 3.31 - THomas is really good and pedagogic. Enelund is great to.» (Great extent)
7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?22 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 4% |
Some extent» | | 5 | | 22% |
Large extent» | | 10 | | 45% |
Great extent» | | 6 | | 27% |
Genomsnitt: 2.95 - Try finding a book wich is a little more narrow to the course. The book content spread too wide. It was expensive and heavy to carry :-)» (Some extent)
- The course litt. was way too much to comprehend.» (Some extent)
8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?22 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 10 | | 45% |
Very well» | | 12 | | 54% |
Genomsnitt: 3.54 9. How well did the teaching using english work out?The teachers native language is not english. Did that cause difficulties in understanging the lectures and exercises?22 svarande
It caused me big problems.» | | 0 | | 0% |
Sometimes it caused me problems.» | | 3 | | 13% |
It did not cause me problems.» | | 19 | | 86% |
Genomsnitt: 2.86
Study climate10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?22 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 1 | | 4% |
Very good» | | 21 | | 95% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.95 - Fantastic teachers!» (Very good)
11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?22 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 1 | | 4% |
Rather well» | | 4 | | 18% |
Very well» | | 17 | | 77% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.72 12. How was the course workload?22 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 4% |
Adequate» | | 16 | | 72% |
High» | | 5 | | 22% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.18 13. How was the balance between lectures and assignments?22 svarande
Poor balance» | | 0 | | 0% |
Balance was acceptable» | | 10 | | 45% |
Good balance» | | 12 | | 54% |
Genomsnitt: 2.54 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 14. How was the total workload this study period?22 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 12 | | 54% |
High» | | 8 | | 36% |
Too high» | | 2 | | 9% |
Genomsnitt: 3.54 Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.54
Summarizing questions15. What is your general impression of the course?22 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 9% |
Good» | | 13 | | 59% |
Excellent» | | 7 | | 31% |
Genomsnitt: 4.22 - Best course ever!» (Excellent)
- Very good course.» (Excellent)
16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- To have 2hours of course and 2 hours of exercise. We can have a very good application of the course.»
- Assignment»
- computer assignment, exercise solving,everything seems to be perfect»
- building the truss structure model»
- Teachers, laboratory/assignment»
- The project»
- Everything, the project was good, the teaching was good. »
- Thomas och Micke mek»
17. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Try to have the exercises corresponding to the courses did before and not for the course of the week after»
- In the vibration testing, dont do free hanging structures. creates to much problems»
- exercises had too much "mechanical" calculation. They should focus more on the important parts in solving the problems.»
- Another book.»
- couple groups by tutors but not themslves»
- I would like if there would be summaries of the lectures handed out. It is sometime too much notes to take while listening and following on the lectures.»
- Hand out solutions to more problem. At least answers. Some parts were hard to understand because you didn"t know if you had done the problem correct.»
- Home excercises should be given out with answers for practise.»
- Course litterature with SI units! After 200 years it should be standard.»
- The weather,)»
18. Do you think the course outcome will help you in your job career?22 svarande
Not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To little extent» | | 2 | | 9% |
To some extent» | | 15 | | 68% |
To large extent» | | 5 | | 22% |
No opinion» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.13 19. Additional comments- Tompa rules!!»
- Again, teachers phenomenal!»
- Thanks Thomas for a great course!!!»
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.54 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.77
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|