|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Environmental aspects on logistics and transportation 2009, ITR361Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2009-11-10 - 2009-12-18 Antal svar: 31 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?% Kontaktperson: Sönke Berhends» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.58 - every week ,we need to write a report, at the same time, need to do a project. if we want to write report, we need to write lots of literature, so the total workload is so heavy.because we also need to prepare other course.» (Around 25 hours/week) 2. If you compare the course with other courses you have attended, how labour-intesive was the course?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.74 - but still too much (should be 20 hours a week)» (the same) 3. If you compare the course with other courses you have attended, how difficult was the course?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.8 - was almost no uncertainty in the case, as the guidelines and procedure are clearly describes, as well as the place where to find the data. The only onclear thing was that we had to follow the undescribed thoughts of the teacher» (very easy) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.4. How understandable are the course goals?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.72 - They are fine. Not so important, important is that the information about the course content (on forehand) are clear, such that you know what you choose for. » (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer) 5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.93 6. Did the examination (i.e. examination reports and case study) assess whether you have reached the goals?30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.5 - Almost no feedback what so ever was given during the course. You had no idea on what level you ferformed on the home assignments. We got some feedback on the case study in the seminar but not much. The seminar was to short to discuss anything.» (No, not at all) Course administrationThis section deals with the course administration.7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.12 - A lot of interesting articles!» (Large extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.54 - given this kind of system at chalmers, it is okay
Bad thing is that the literature is not posted on the course webpage. Now it thanks a lot of time for each student individually to gather all literature, while the teacher has it probably all on his laptop and putting it online takes only a half hour! » (Rather well) 9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.53 - the availability of the teachers are very good, and they were always nice » (Very good) LecturesThis section deals with the lectures we have had in the course. The goal is to assess the relevance of each lecture as well as the performance of the lecturer.10. How relevant was the lecture"s topic for the course?*Matrisfråga- You didn"t need to participate in the lectures in order to obtain the information needed for the home exams and the case. Basically, you could pass the course without attending lectures.» Magnus Blinge - Environmental Logistics I*
Genomsnitt: 4.25 Magnus Blinge - Life cycle assessment*
Genomsnitt: 4.24 Sten Karlsson - What is the greenhouse effect?*
Genomsnitt: 3.22 Magnus Blinge - Alternative fuels*
Genomsnitt: 4.2 Magnus Blinge - Environmental impacts*
Genomsnitt: 4.31 Sönke Behrends - Sustainability aspects on rail transport*
Genomsnitt: 4.25 Zoi Nikopoulou - Sustainability aspects on maritime transp.*
Genomsnitt: 4 Karl-Henrik Robert - A unifying framework for sustainable d.*
Genomsnitt: 4.11 Elisabeth Hörnfeld - Environmental strategies from a truck..*
Genomsnitt: 3.46 Johan Trouvé - Sustainable transport from a practitioner*
Genomsnitt: 3.8 Maria Huge-Brodin - Logistics management and the environment*
Genomsnitt: 3.8 Maria Huge-Brodin - Logistics systems for recycling*
Genomsnitt: 3.6 Maria Björklund - Environmental considerations when purchas.*
Genomsnitt: 3.61 Maria Björklund - Socially responsible logistics*
Genomsnitt: 3.65 Maria Lindholm - Sustainability aspects on city logistics*
Genomsnitt: 3.79 Mohammed Belhaj - External costs in the transport sector*
Genomsnitt: 3.7 Gunnar Falkenmark - Power, rationality and decision making..*
Genomsnitt: 3.84 11. How was the lecturer"s competence and committment?*Matrisfråga- you should ask this earlier. A nice time to have this kind of questionairie is direct after the examination week. then i can remember it» Magnus Blinge - Environmental Logistics I*
Genomsnitt: 4.07 Magnus Blinge - Life cycle assessment*
Genomsnitt: 4.06 Sten Karlsson - What is the greenhouse effect?*
Genomsnitt: 3.88 Magnus Blinge - Alternative fuels*
Genomsnitt: 4.1 Magnus Blinge - Environmental impacts*
Genomsnitt: 4.16 Sönke Behrends - Sustainability aspects on rail transport*
Genomsnitt: 4 Zoi Nikopoulou - Sustainability aspects on maritime transp.*
Genomsnitt: 3.67 Karl-Henrik Robert - A unifying framework for sustainable d.*
Genomsnitt: 4.33 Elisabeth Hörnfeld - Environmental strategies from a truck..*
Genomsnitt: 3.55 Johan Trouvé - Sustainable transport from a practitioner*
Genomsnitt: 3.96 Maria Huge-Brodin - Logistics management and the environment*
Genomsnitt: 3.86 Maria Huge-Brodin - Logistics systems for recycling*
Genomsnitt: 3.71 Maria Björklund - Environmental considerations when purchas.*
Genomsnitt: 3.77 Maria Björklund - Socially responsible logistics*
Genomsnitt: 3.77 Maria Lindholm - Sustainability aspects on city logistics*
Genomsnitt: 3.7 Mohammed Belhaj - External costs in the transport sector*
Genomsnitt: 3.54 Gunnar Falkenmark - Power, rationality and decision making..*
Genomsnitt: 4.15 12. On which topic (related to the course content) would you have wished to get a guest lecture by an external expert?- life cycle assessment »- The LCA lecture, it was obvious that this was not the main focus for Magnus. It wouldn"t be that hard to get Anne-Marie Tillman (or someone else at ESA) to make that lecture.» - Alternative fuels» - I would like to have a guest lecture by a person or team who have applied the Life Cycle Assessment in a company and can give us the actual procedure and results of this concept, because from the course"s content we could only understand a part of it.» - Road transport, air transport, a guest lecture from European Environmental Agency» - alternative fuels, new technologies » - Legal aspects of environmental logistics» - More about sustainability» - --» - I don"t know» - alternative fuels» - sea transport» 13. How many of the offered lectures did you attend?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.58 14. What were the reasons for not attending a lecture?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.96 - --» (?) Examination reportsThis section deals with the examination reports. First, questions on the examination reports in general are stated, followed by questions for each examination report.15. In comparison to an exam at the end of the course, how well are the examination reports in general for achieving the course objectives?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.03 - no feedback» (neutral) 16. How was the workload for the examination reports in general?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.38 - But ok since no exam.» (too much) 17. How well did the administration (i.e. handouts, handins, correction etc.) work?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.29 - Conflicting and uncertain handin dates and times. I still have no idea how a performed on the hand ins (exept one of them) This is four weeks after the course is finished and several months after the first handin. VERY POOR correction.
The system with handin partners and case study was a joke. This isn"t a kindergarden where we are supposed to meet new people. Many of my friends perfered to do the hand ins themselves than to look for a new "buddy" each time. A better idea is to randomise the case study groups and let people work with whom ever they chose on the hand ins.» (very poor) 18. Examination report 1 - Env. impacts and technical solutions/transport modesMatrisfråga- Hard to comment on how difficult it was when you don"t know the result.» How relevant was the examination report for achieving the goals?
Genomsnitt: 4.29 How was the workload compared to the relevance (maximum points given) of the examination report?
Genomsnitt: 3.38 How difficult was the examination report?
Genomsnitt: 3 19. Examination report 2 - Sustainable logisticsMatrisfråga- Difficulty: I don"t know because I havent got the result I think It was ok, but how can I know?» How relevant was the examination report for achieving the goals?
Genomsnitt: 4.16 How was the workload compared to the relevance (maximum points given) of the examination report?
Genomsnitt: 3.46 How difficult was the examination report?
Genomsnitt: 3.2 20. Examination report 3 - Environmental tools and conceptsMatrisfråga- little bit vague» How relevant was the examination report for achieving the goals?
Genomsnitt: 3.76 How was the workload compared to the relevance (maximum points given) of the examination report?
Genomsnitt: 3.36 How difficult was the examination report?
Genomsnitt: 3.33 21. Examination report 4 - Political aspects & environmental economicsMatrisfråga- Not enough covered in lectures and literature.» How relevant was the examination report for achieving the goals?
Genomsnitt: 3.61 How was the workload compared to the relevance (maximum points given) of the examination report?
Genomsnitt: 3.35 How difficult was the examination report?
Genomsnitt: 3.36 22. What do you think was the best with the examination reports?- examination report 1 and 2 where very connected to boh parts of case study»- That you got more time to think about the questions than on a normal exam.» - There is no final exam in the end» - The fact that you could deal with each subject separately» - Gives a much deeper understanding than a regular exam» - they covered more or less all the material we were supposed to study» - Examination report 1» - The first one, it was the most interesting and was interacting with the topic of the case study. » - You learn more because you really need to understand the information provided.» - Nice to work hard with something and really try to find the best pieces and put together.» - No stress, workload was distributed» - Different essays anable the possibility to explore and write on a specific area related to envtal. impacts of logistics.» - The examination reports asked the students to summarize all the important and necessary parts in various lectures, research papers, etc, which made the study much more proactive, fruitful and of course, interesting.» - rielaboration of the topic discussed in class» - EX.REPORT 1» - Good way to focus on a subject at a time to learn more.» - comprehensive» - The structure and limitations, although it was difficult not to write too much. Also, by having these, no exam was given. » - learning concepts step by step» - Giving us deeper perspective to understand the content of the course» - That you learn alot when researching.» 23. What do you think was the worst with the examination reports?- no clear connection with overall goals»- That they still are not corrected.» - Time problems. 4 Examinations reports + 1 Case study + 2nd Course is a lot of work» - you had to write it in pairs, you didn"t and haven"t gotten feedback... in the end it doesn"t matter that they were separated. You could have given one in the end with 4 questions since, again, we haven"t got any feedback.» - That we couldn"t write with other group members. That we weren"t allowed to write with the same person twice was OK.» - it was quite stressing to be obliged to write a home exam throughout the whole duration of the course.» - sometimes to vague what the teacher exactly wants to hear. be clear how you grade the assignment (as i would write it differently when i knew that you use that kind of template for grading)» - third one» - The amount of take-home exams. i think 2-3 are enough.» - Taking sooo much time every sunday...» - There was no grade from the essays, nor feedback. There could be some general remarks to be fed back to the group even when a grade is not yet available.» - it might be better if the students are totally be free from finding a partner, working with someone in the same group sometimes is fairly good, since the two partners know each other well, and the most important part is, time is really easy to be harmonized.» - The deadline ( 1 week) is very short » - EX.REPORT 4» - Needing to coordinate with others, it´,s time consuming.» - The strict regulation for the selection of writing partners,limits to some extent the grade which would have been possible otherwise. » - To have one every week at the same time as the LCA report etc. » - too much work in a short time» - dont have so much time to communicate with writing partner» - No feedback what so ever. some articles wasn"t releveant to he course.» Case studyThis section deals with the case study work.24. How relevant was the case study for achieving the course goals?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.19 - much work, for little new experience, personal development, of new knowledge.» (little) 25. How was the workload for the case study?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.93 - the strategy part was actually okey. but I have to say that, the first LCA part was kind of a bit "heavy workload". » (much) 26. How well did the administration (i.e. guidance, handins, correction etc.) work?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.8 - same question as 17?» (poor) 27. What do you think was the best with the case study (e.g. teamwork, home team session, seminar, etc)?- application of the lessons learned and teams were built by ourselves»- The work in the team was nice.» - That we first had a presentation and then the possibility to make changes» - it was useful and interesting to apply a tool in our groupwork, and we actually learned something practical out of it!» - seminar was very good! very usefull and interesting. » - teamwork was the best. » - That we got opposition and then had time to correct!» - Group work» - seminar» - I believe that the seminar was very useful to get to know what other teams considered in their reports and help to standardize the criteria related to the information provided by the report.» - LCA methodology is very useful and important to learn. the case study offers all the students such a good opportunity to work with LCA method. » - The possibility to share the knowledge with the other mates of the group » - Seminar» - Interesting to learn LCA» - teamwork. i work with new friends and we reach the aims!» - can learn lots of things» - I learned a lot when doing the LCA and it was interesting. » - the seminar and the teamwork» - getting to know different people and work together for the same goal» - teamwork is good, you learn alot when discussing» 28. What do you think was the worst with the case study (e.g. teamwork, home team session, seminar, etc)?- the workload»- Nothing.» - -» - seminar is too short without valuable discussion. the instruction for case 2 is not very clear.» - the second and theoretical part of the case study is not offering some new knowledge but it was mainly a way to test and revise all the information provided by the lectures. this means that it was not connected to our previous work and consequently it was much less interesting.» - the planning report of the 2 groups may be a little bit more extented, such that the results can be compared better. » - part 2 maybe not necessary» - the seminar didn"t have that much influence. for such a big case study a more important and graded presentation would have been appropriate » - The second part could have some better structure. Not fun with too much freedom...» - home team session» - In my personal experience the teamwork coordination was the worst part of the case study, but this was not related to the course, it was rather related to our team.» - teamwork. by teamwork, I mean the first report about defining system boundary things, etc with the other group who work in the same case. It actually doesn"t make sense to some of the groups (or at least our coworkers) since they actually changed their mind later without sending us a notice.» - The huge amount of calculations to be done for getting the final result» - home team sessions» - Our team did not match to well » - the grade of project is unfair.we try our best, spend lots of time and energy, but the feedback is so disappointment» - Our group spent a lot of time doing the LCA report, late evenings and no time for anything else in any other course. And we did start "early". » - the deadlines for the different parts (LCA, discussion, etc) were too close» - sometimes the communication can be hard» - the seminar was a joke. A proper discussion would have been better. At least ywice as long seminar.» Summarizing questions29. What is your general impression of the course?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.7 - The topic and subjects handled by the course is good but I don"t like the administration» (Adequate) 30. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- lca»- The case study» - Teaching the TNS framework» - Examination reports and articles» - the case study» - seminar» - The last guest lecture» - scope of the case study, but maybe 10 points for the presentation and less points on the second part. » - Home exams» - main lecturers, no exam in the end» - The case study» - The case study and Magnus" lectures» - examination reports and the case study. and of course, the two course assistants. They had done a good job!!!» - The possibility to have in class the guest speakers » - case study» - Home examination + case study is a good way to go.» - exams division: a part of workgroup and a part of individual work.» - Home assignments and no exam.» - the evaluation system» - case study» - case study and hand ins.» 31. What should definitely be changed to next year?- 2 last examination reports»- If home examination reports should be preserved, it is neccesary to find a way to handle the corrections more efficiently.» - the seminar about the LCA report was pretty much useless» - Let people write reports with team members. Or make the papers individual, they didn"t take that much time. Correct the papers/case studies faster!!! » - the number of home exams» - case study (too much work for the learning outcome reached). Earlier grading and feedback (as that is very useful for the other examination reports). » - Case study part 2 Too many reports The workload is too heavy» - faster correction of the examination reports, at least of the first one with comments so that it is possible to see for the student what is important for the grading» - Less lectures» - The team selection for case study» - Provide feedback (not necessarily grades) from the examination reports sooner.» - the first "joint effort" in the LCA report. it doesn"t make sense actually.» - The number of examination reports» - Contents of some examination reports» - Four hours lectures is ok if they are few, try to limit them next year. Dont have the handins on a sunday night. And dont have them just before a lecture..» - Maybe consider the work load on the LCA report a bit..» - the calendar for the hand-in» - nothing, maybe the examination reports( maybe another way to do it)» - The regulation for handin partners» 32. Can you recommend others to attend this course?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.29 - Unlike many other courses, it does not give the impression that environmental aspects are dull.» (Yes) 33. Additional comments- The course was overall a good and interesting course, but the late corrections of the examiantion reports leads to irritated students - and that could be avoided. »- There was another subject that had a similar amount of people and a weekly individual hand-in of a seminar with 4 or more questions. We usually got feedback, good feedback, on the next week and the course was handled by 2 people. That way the quality of the answers and seminars visibly grew throughout the course. Feedback is good because of that. It improves the quality of the work and learning. » - -» - Thanks so much for the examiner and lecturers» - case study in collaboration with a company would be nice, but it"s also understandable that this might not be possible with about 100 attending students» * obligatoriska frågor
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9%