Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Digital Integrated Circuit Design, Lp 1 Ht09, MCC090
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2009-11-02 - 2009-11-16 Antal svar: 9 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 19% Kontaktperson: Åsa Samdell»
Your background1. My study background is:9 svarande
Chalmers civilingenjör programme - Electrical Engineering» | | 2 | | 22% |
Chalmers civilingenjör programme - Computer Engineering» | | 0 | | 0% |
Chalmers civilingenjör - other programme (explain below)» | | 0 | | 0% |
Chalmers högskoleingenjör programme - Electrical Engineering» | | 1 | | 11% |
Chalmers högskoleingenjör programme - Computer Engineering» | | 0 | | 0% |
Chalmers högskoleingenjör - other programme (explain below)» | | 0 | | 0% |
Other Swedish civilingenjör programme (explain below)» | | 0 | | 0% |
Other Swedish högskoleingenjör programme (explain below)» | | 1 | | 11% |
Foreign university - Electrical Engineering» | | 3 | | 33% |
Foreign university - Computer Engineering» | | 0 | | 0% |
Foreign university - other programme (explain below)» | | 1 | | 11% |
Other (explain below)» | | 1 | | 11% |
Genomsnitt: 7.11 - Högskoleingenjör från Högskolan i Halmstad» (Other Swedish högskoleingenjör programme (explain below))
- I have done Master of Science in Electronics from Quaid-e-Azam University. This is a two year program and is equivalent to 16 years of study» (Foreign university - other programme (explain below))
- Electronics and Communications Engineering» (Other (explain below))
2. I am currently enrolled in this master programme:9 svarande
Integrated Electronic System Design» | | 7 | | 77% |
Communication engineering» | | 1 | | 11% |
Microtechnology» | | 0 | | 0% |
Biomedical Engineering» | | 0 | | 0% |
Other master programme» | | 0 | | 0% |
Not enrolled in master programme» | | 1 | | 11% |
Genomsnitt: 1.66
Your own effort3. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.9 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 1 | | 11% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 4 | | 44% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 3 | | 33% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 1 | | 11% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.44 - The introduction course in the MPIES programme demanded much time.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- some homeworks were very time consuming. for instance number 2. perhaps it could be changed for an assignment about dynamic circuits or flip flops.» (Around 25 hours/week)
4. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 9 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 1 | | 11% |
100%» | | 8 | | 88% |
Genomsnitt: 4.88 5. How many other courses did you take this period?9 svarande
0» | | 0 | | 0% |
1» | | 6 | | 66% |
2» | | 3 | | 33% |
Other (explain below)» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.33 - Not to mention ~20h per week as TA» (2)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.6. How understandable are the course goals?9 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 3 | | 33% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 1 | | 11% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 2 | | 22% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 3 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 2.55 - There should be a course PM on the course web page.» (I have not seen/read the goals)
7. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.8 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 7 | | 87% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 1 | | 12% |
Genomsnitt: 2.12 - The course was well balanced in terms of workload and learning goals.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)
8. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?8 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 4 | | 50% |
Yes, definitely» | | 4 | | 50% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.5
Teaching and course administration9. To what extent has the teaching (including lectures, tutorials, home assignments and labs) been of help for your learning?9 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 11% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 11% |
Large extent» | | 4 | | 44% |
Great extent» | | 3 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 3 10. To what extent have the lectures been of help for your learning?9 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 11% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 22% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 22% |
Great extent» | | 4 | | 44% |
Genomsnitt: 3 11. To what extent did the home assignments help your learning?9 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 22% |
Large extent» | | 3 | | 33% |
Great extent» | | 4 | | 44% |
Genomsnitt: 3.22 12. How do you rate the level of difficulty of the six home assignments?9 svarandeTotalt:
Very easy» | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat easy» | | 0 | | 0% |
Reasonable» | | 4 | | 44% |
Somewhat hard» | | 4 | | 44% |
Very hard» | | 1 | | 11% |
Don"t know» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 Fördelat på olika grupper: # 1 Comparator logic design: (5 st)
Very easy | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat easy | | 0 | | 0% |
Reasonable | | 1 | | 20% |
Somewhat hard | | 3 | | 60% |
Very hard | | 1 | | 20% |
Don"t know | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 4 - The Excell file on lab2 was for me hard to understand, Wouldn"t it be a whole lot better mith a matlab file??» (Reasonable)
- all the homeworks are time consuming,i use a lot of time to understand them and finish them, but it worthy » (Somewhat hard)
# 2 The MOSFET: (2 st)
Very easy | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat easy | | 0 | | 0% |
Reasonable | | 2 | | 100% |
Somewhat hard | | 0 | | 0% |
Very hard | | 0 | | 0% |
Don"t know | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 - perhaps this assignment was too detailed. i think the mosfet 2nd order effects might be learned without doing so many graphs, or just taking a few cases and not the whole range of vgs. » (Reasonable)
# 3 MOSFET cap & comparator layout: (0 st)
Very easy | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat easy | | 0 | | 0% |
Reasonable | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat hard | | 0 | | 0% |
Very hard | | 0 | | 0% |
Don"t know | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 0 # 4 CMOS inverter speed & logical effort: (1 st)
Very easy | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat easy | | 0 | | 0% |
Reasonable | | 1 | | 100% |
Somewhat hard | | 0 | | 0% |
Very hard | | 0 | | 0% |
Don"t know | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 # 5 Clock drivers: (1 st)
Very easy | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat easy | | 0 | | 0% |
Reasonable | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat hard | | 1 | | 100% |
Very hard | | 0 | | 0% |
Don"t know | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 4 # 6 Carry look ahead designs: (0 st)
Very easy | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat easy | | 0 | | 0% |
Reasonable | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat hard | | 0 | | 0% |
Very hard | | 0 | | 0% |
Don"t know | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 0 13. How do you rate the time the six assignment took you to complete?9 svarandeTotalt:
Very short» | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat short» | | 0 | | 0% |
Reasonable» | | 4 | | 44% |
Somewhat long» | | 1 | | 11% |
Very long» | | 4 | | 44% |
Don» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 4 Fördelat på olika grupper: # 1 Comparator logic design: (6 st)
Very short | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat short | | 0 | | 0% |
Reasonable | | 2 | | 33% |
Somewhat long | | 1 | | 16% |
Very long | | 3 | | 50% |
Don | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 4.16 - i always began to perpare for them several days before the deadline to ensure I can finish ontime» (Very long)
# 2 The MOSFET: (2 st)
Very short | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat short | | 0 | | 0% |
Reasonable | | 1 | | 50% |
Somewhat long | | 0 | | 0% |
Very long | | 1 | | 50% |
Don | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 4 # 3 MOSFET cap & comparator layout: (0 st)
Very short | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat short | | 0 | | 0% |
Reasonable | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat long | | 0 | | 0% |
Very long | | 0 | | 0% |
Don | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 0 # 4 CMOS inverter speed & logical effort: (1 st)
Very short | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat short | | 0 | | 0% |
Reasonable | | 1 | | 100% |
Somewhat long | | 0 | | 0% |
Very long | | 0 | | 0% |
Don | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 # 5 Clock drivers: (0 st)
Very short | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat short | | 0 | | 0% |
Reasonable | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat long | | 0 | | 0% |
Very long | | 0 | | 0% |
Don | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 0 # 6 Carry look ahead designs: (0 st)
Very short | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat short | | 0 | | 0% |
Reasonable | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat long | | 0 | | 0% |
Very long | | 0 | | 0% |
Don | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 0 14. To what extent did the labs help your learning?9 svarande
Small extent» | | 2 | | 22% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 22% |
Large extent» | | 3 | | 33% |
Great extent» | | 2 | | 22% |
Genomsnitt: 2.55 - The labs gave me that additional knowledge that I couldn"t get from home assignments. The course would not have been complete without the labs.» (Some extent)
- Would definately appreciate even more labs, ie. actually resizing transistors, dynamic logic, some small tree adder/comparator.» (Great extent)
15. How do you rate the level of difficulty of the four labs?9 svarandeTotalt:
Very easy» | | 1 | | 11% |
Somewhat easy» | | 2 | | 22% |
Reasonable» | | 4 | | 44% |
Somewhat hard» | | 2 | | 22% |
Very hard» | | 0 | | 0% |
Don"t know» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.77 Fördelat på olika grupper: Lab 0 Inverter and Cadence intro: (5 st)
Very easy | | 1 | | 20% |
Somewhat easy | | 0 | | 0% |
Reasonable | | 3 | | 60% |
Somewhat hard | | 1 | | 20% |
Very hard | | 0 | | 0% |
Don"t know | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.8 - maybe too easy but great for learning.» (Very easy)
- If one followed the PM they were quite straight forward. You could make them in time, which is good.» (Reasonable)
Lab 1 Comparator schematics: (0 st)
Very easy | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat easy | | 0 | | 0% |
Reasonable | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat hard | | 0 | | 0% |
Very hard | | 0 | | 0% |
Don"t know | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 0 Lab 2 Comparator layout and DRC: (2 st)
Very easy | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat easy | | 1 | | 50% |
Reasonable | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat hard | | 1 | | 50% |
Very hard | | 0 | | 0% |
Don"t know | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 - others are reasonable» (Somewhat hard)
Lab 3 Comparator post-layout simulation: (2 st)
Very easy | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat easy | | 1 | | 50% |
Reasonable | | 1 | | 50% |
Somewhat hard | | 0 | | 0% |
Very hard | | 0 | | 0% |
Don"t know | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.5 - Designing the comparator layout as efficiently as possible was very fun. More design, maybe less simulation tasks.» (Somewhat easy)
- instructions are not that clear in this lab, however it was not difficult.» (Reasonable)
16. How do you rate the time the in-lab part of the four labs took you?9 svarandeTotalt:
Very short» | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat short» | | 0 | | 0% |
Reasonable» | | 5 | | 55% |
Somewhat long» | | 3 | | 33% |
Very long» | | 1 | | 11% |
Don"t know» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.55 Fördelat på olika grupper: Lab 0 Inverter and Cadence intro: (8 st)
Very short | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat short | | 0 | | 0% |
Reasonable | | 5 | | 62% |
Somewhat long | | 3 | | 37% |
Very long | | 0 | | 0% |
Don"t know | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.37 Lab 1 Comparator schematics: (0 st)
Very short | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat short | | 0 | | 0% |
Reasonable | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat long | | 0 | | 0% |
Very long | | 0 | | 0% |
Don"t know | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 0 Lab 2 Comparator layout and DRC: (1 st)
Very short | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat short | | 0 | | 0% |
Reasonable | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat long | | 0 | | 0% |
Very long | | 1 | | 100% |
Don"t know | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 5 - at the beginning is somewhat hard to get acquainted with the layout environment. maybe reduce some tasks in the previous labs so we can practice more with a simpler layout design.» (Very long)
Lab 3 Comparator post-layout simulation: (0 st)
Very short | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat short | | 0 | | 0% |
Reasonable | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat long | | 0 | | 0% |
Very long | | 0 | | 0% |
Don"t know | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 0 17. To what extent has the text book by Weste and Harris been of help for your learning?9 svarande
Small extent» | | 5 | | 55% |
Some extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Large extent» | | 3 | | 33% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 11% |
Genomsnitt: 2 - I didn"t use this book.» (Small extent)
- i used a lot of time on reading the text book » (Large extent)
- Confusing that delay calculations in this course differ from them in Weste. » (Large extent)
18. To what extent has the text book by Rabaey been of help for your learning?9 svarande
Small extent» | | 7 | | 77% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 11% |
Large extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 11% |
Genomsnitt: 1.44 - I didn"t use this book.» (Small extent)
- just looked the west and harris.» (Small extent)
- just for the sixth part» (Some extent)
19. To what extent has the compendium in Swedish been of help for your learning?8 svarande
Small extent» | | 5 | | 62% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 37% |
Large extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.37 - Nothing I am not Swedish...» (?)
- i do not understand swedish» (Small extent)
- This compendium is not ready for print since large parts are missing. I often encountered texts like: "Här skall det stå något om MOSFET"» (Some extent)
20. To what extent have the four translated chapters of the compendium been of help for your learning?8 svarande
Small extent» | | 2 | | 25% |
Some extent» | | 5 | | 62% |
Large extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 12% |
Genomsnitt: 2 - I didn"t use this book.» (Small extent)
21. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?9 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 6 | | 66% |
Very well» | | 3 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 3.33 - It was some trouble with the results page. Did not seem to work entirely.» (Rather well)
- it is very good to allow late returns and missed deadlines. i did not like that one course was in the student portal and the other in ping pong.» (Rather well)
Study climate22. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?9 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 1 | | 11% |
Rather good» | | 2 | | 22% |
Very good» | | 5 | | 55% |
I did not seek help» | | 1 | | 11% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 - only oppurtunity for questions was during lectures, (wich worked rather well). Would appreciate time in a computer room with possibility to ask TA"s about the home assignments.» (Rather poor)
- Kjell stayed after the lectures and answered questions.» (Very good)
23. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?9 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 2 | | 22% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 22% |
Very well» | | 4 | | 44% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 1 | | 11% |
Genomsnitt: 3.44 - not much cooperation, i always finish my homework myself or discuss with others. » (Rather poorly)
- Though my assigned lab partner did not make an effort.» (Rather well)
24. How was the course workload?9 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 5 | | 55% |
High» | | 4 | | 44% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.44 25. How was the total workload this study period?9 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 22% |
High» | | 3 | | 33% |
Too high» | | 4 | | 44% |
Genomsnitt: 4.22 - If the VHDL course hadn"t taken so much time this course would have been much more interesting.» (High)
- MPIES intro course took a lot of time.» (Too high)
Summarizing questions26. What is your general impression of the course?9 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 22% |
Good» | | 4 | | 44% |
Excellent» | | 3 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 4.11 27. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- clearer lecture about the homework after we handing in»
- The lab serie, very good lab PM:s»
- Home asignments»
- lecturer»
- solutions to homeworks after deadlines so we can see where we went wrong.»
- The home assignments, great!»
- Home assignments should not be changed»
- lectures»
28. What should definitely be changed to next year?- it is great,not need too much change.»
- the Excell file in lab 2, or give an optional matlab file.»
- MPIES intro labs»
- Labs need to be changed in to a project and extra classes for exercises needed. There is a lack of problem solving so tutorial hours need to be added»
- homework assignment #2.»
- The labs did not really give much.»
- I think no change is required»
- loering total load»
29. Additional comments- Very good gourse in general, but you should defenitely talk to Sven about the workload in his course. Only one group finished on time with the labs...»
- I think the number of lectures should be increased if there is a possibility»
- nothing»
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|