ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Combustion Engineering 09, MEN031

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-10-27 - 2009-11-16
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 54%
Kontaktperson: Henrik Thunman»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

1. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

13 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 7%
100%»12 92%

Genomsnitt: 4.92

2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

13 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»4 30%
Around 25 hours/week»6 46%
Around 30 hours/week»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 2.92

3. Do you consider that you had sufficient knowledge to read this course?

13 svarande

Yes, absolutely»5 38%
In part, but I struggled in places»5 38%
No»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 1.84

- Some of the basic chemistry wasn"t obvious.» (In part, but I struggled in places)
- A bit difficult with some of the chemistry for an mechanical student.» (In part, but I struggled in places)
- missed some knowledge in chemistry » (No)
- I lacked basic chemistry» (No)

Goals and goal fulfilment

4. How understandable were the course goals?

13 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 23%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals gave some guidance, but could be more clear»2 15%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to»8 61%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

11 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»8 72%
No, the goals are set too high»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 2.27

6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

12 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»6 50%
Yes, definitely»5 41%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.58

- to many questions in to short time » (To some extent)
- Bra frågor, men för många frågor för att hinna räknedelen.» (To some extent)
- Difficult to be able to answer all question due to lack of time though.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching methods

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 15%
Large extent»9 69%
Great extent»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 3

8. To what extent has the the course literature been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 7%
Large extent»9 69%
Great extent»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

- The appendix is unstructurated» (Large extent)

9. Did you find powerpoint presentations to be helpful?

13 svarande

small extent»0 0%
some extent»4 30%
large extent»8 61%
great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.76

- Använde boken, fast det blir ju samma sak.» (some extent)

10. What was your overall impression of the lectures?

13 svarande

Excellent»1 7%
Good»12 92%
Moderate»0 0%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.92

11. What was your overall impression of assignments 1-5?

13 svarande

Excellent»3 23%
Good»8 61%
Moderate»2 15%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.92

- Dom ökade verkligen förståelsen på kapitlen de behandlade. » (Excellent)
- Excellent idea to write one report/person then you really understand what you do» (Excellent)
- Good tasks, but some are a bit difficult at start due to lack of knowledge needed. Ass 3 was hard to get a grip on, but it seems like one managed at the end. But it would be helpful with more guidance and explanation of the formulas used.» (Excellent)
- Very time consuming!» (Good)

12. What was your overall impression of assignment 6?

13 svarande

Very interesting»5 38%
Fairly interesting»8 61%
Not interesting»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.61

- particulary the extra task (when we have more a "designer" approach)» (Very interesting)
- Good task and good to have margareta present at the presentation. Manageble due to possibility to ask questions when stuck.» (Very interesting)
- The extra assignment was really timeconsuming.» (Fairly interesting)
- Jag tyckte själva uppgiften var så där, men den egna uppgiften var intressant. Samt presentationerna! » (Fairly interesting)
- Some guidelines would have been nice» (Fairly interesting)

13. How well did the course administration and homepage work?

13 svarande

Excellent»3 23%
Good»9 69%
Moderate»1 7%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.84

Teaching staff and guest lectures

14. Please rate lectures by Henrik Thunman

13 svarande

Excellent»2 15%
Good»11 84%
Moderate»0 0%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.84

15. Please rate lecture by Martin Seemans

13 svarande

Excellent»5 38%
Good»6 46%
Moderate»2 15%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.76

16. Please, rate the guest lecture by Lars Strömberg

12 svarande

Excellent»1 8%
Good»10 83%
Moderate»1 8%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- He had exactlly presentation in the course "Heat and Power"» (Moderate)

17. Please, rate the guest lecture by Bo Leckner

11 svarande

Excellent»0 0%
Good»9 81%
Moderate»2 18%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.18

18. Please, rate the guest lecture by Sven Andersson

12 svarande

Excellent»2 16%
Good»10 83%
Moderate»0 0%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.83

19. Please, rate the guest lecture by Anders Lyngfelt

13 svarande

Excellent»1 7%
Good»10 76%
Moderate»2 15%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.07

20. Please, rate the guest lecture by Lars-Erik Eriksson

11 svarande

Excellent»0 0%
Good»9 81%
Moderate»2 18%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.18

21. Please, rate the guest lecture by Åsa Burman

13 svarande

Excellent»1 7%
Good»10 76%
Moderate»2 15%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.07

- Good as a company presentation but not as a lecture.» (Good)

22. Please, rate the guest lecture Margareta Lundberg

13 svarande

Excellent»6 46%
Good»6 46%
Moderate»1 7%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.61

23. Please, rate the assignment leader Sadegh Seddighi Khavidak

13 svarande

Excellent»0 0%
Good»2 15%
Moderate»5 38%
Poor»6 46%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- To be able to perform better, take time after some lines and explain what you have done (that is the most important part), otherwise one can just get a copy of the solution. The reason there was very few questions was in my point of view that me and some other did not know what to ask eventhough we did not understand. I think it will be alot better next year when you know more about the course, tasks and what that we usually have problems with.» (Moderate)
- Not always prepared. If he could say some words while doing the calculations on the board it would be nice.» (Poor)

24. Please, rate the assignment leader Fredrik Lind

13 svarande

Excellent»9 69%
Good»4 30%
Moderate»0 0%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.3

25. Please, rate the assignment leader Martin Seemann

13 svarande

Excellent»5 38%
Good»7 53%
Moderate»1 7%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.69

- Could have been more helpful in assignment 6.» (Moderate)

Study climate

26. What did you think about the work load for the assignments?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 23%
High»9 69%
Too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

- Förutom i slutet när ass 5 och 6 skulle in» (Adequate)

27. What did you think about the overall work load in the course?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 30%
High»8 61%
Too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

28. How was the work load this study period?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 23%
High»5 38%
Too High»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 4.15

29. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 15%
Very good»11 84%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

30. How well has the cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 7%
Very good»12 92%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

Summarizing questions

31. What is your overall impression of the course?

13 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 15%
Good»7 53%
Excellent»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

32. What improvements can be made to next year?

- maybe try to avoid the overlaping problem with the assignements.»
- More explanations of the chemistry. Kp, krc and all that. Explain that many of the formulas are simplifications and why. Also try to make things equal in the book as in appendix B.»
- BE careful with the assignement 6, it"s a lot of work load and you have to introduce it better»
- The exam comtained too many questions! There was no time to do the calculation after finishing the theoretical questions. The exam should be 5h or less questions!»

33. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The assignements and the book, which is really good.»
- The assignments.»
- the way of assignments are prepared»
- The assignments»

Kursutvärderingssystem från