|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Advanced CAD, PPU080Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2009-10-23 - 2009-11-06 Antal svar: 52 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 47% Kontaktperson: Lars Lindkvist» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.52 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.36 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?52 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.53 - Had already done the exam ahead!» (0%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?51 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.54 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.41 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.85 - Really simple coarse.» (No, the goals are set too low) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?47 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.36 - Standard exam!» (No, not at all) 6. Was the setup of the project work good for learning CAD and CAT systems?(e.g. excavator model, extra points for extra tasks, ...)52 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.84 - the model we have done is not realistic at all...
If to be manufactured the whole excavator have to be milled from one piece...
Would have been better to take a smaller thing and do it correct. e.g. an engine or something complex» (No, not at all) Teaching and course administration7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?51 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.82 - CAD- övningarna har varit väldigt bra med duktiga och hjälpsamma handledare. Föreläsningarna har varit både ointressanta och väldigt dåligt genomförda.» (Small extent) 8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?51 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.39 - way too expensive book!!! 480kr for something you use for one day, robbery!!!» (Small extent) 9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?52 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.26 - Post the lectures in before the lecture!» (Very badly) Study climate10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?52 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.38 - hard to get a computer.» (Very poor) 11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?51 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.7 - The person who I was supposed to do the project with dropped the class in week 4. I had to do all the work myself» (Very poorly) 12. How was the course workload?52 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.05 - Was finished after some weeks» (Low) 13. How was the total workload this study period?52 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.19 Summarizing questions14. What is your general impression of the course?51 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.23 - Bra sätt att lära sig att använda CAD. Men det övriga kursinnehållet kändes helt onödigt att läsa. » (Poor) 15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The course assistants»- the catia project» - The catia basic training. A very good way to learn the principles.» - Some sort of project work.» - It was good to have a project, but the project didn"t reflect the kind of CAD work we will be faced with. The RD&T part was excellent! It was great that all of the lecture slides were available on studieportalen.» - The part about RD&T. The project part is important, but I don"t think that the excavator modeling represented the kind of CAD-challenges that we"ll face in the future.» - project.» - De handledarledda övningarna» - The project» - The project work» - The excavator project + rdnt» - The project with some modifications.» - The project» - The project» - The project, hopefully with some more tasks.» - CAD and CAT Exercices (Excevator)» - The excavator project because it is a really good way to learn CAD» - Nothing.» - Project» - the cad-project» - CATIA and RD&T project.» - The modelling of an excavator and bonus asignments.» - Catia» - The examinationform» - schedule, softwares» - Course project is good, tutorials are fine as well» - The project work» 16. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The way Lars Lindkvist holds his lecures»- the exam, remove it» - Combine the lectures with the reality and what we are doing in the project. And have more of an interactive course with more exercises like the basic training, because then you have to learn for example a specific command, and not like now when you build up the model in a easier but more long-winded way.» - Much of the mathematical background to how the CAD-system works does not seem relevant. It would be good to connect it to practical advantages or limitations. The fact that many CAD-systems use 3rd order curves for instance, makes it hard to achieve C2 continuity. More practical aspects than a lot of matrices...» - Some minor changes in the project work. It might have been good to have some sort of blueprints to follow, at least for some of the parts.» - The project. A more defined task with drawings to follow that makes it harder to "cheat".» - The lecturing technique should be improved, e.g. contain more examples and the theory should be presented in a better way. » - Alla människor är inte lämpade till att hålla föreläsningar. Lars är väldigt ödmjuk och försöker lära ut det han kan. Men föreläsningarna har varit väldigt opedagogiska. » - The lectures, more examples of CAD in the real world would be nice» - Some of the lectures are not up to date, especially the computer graphics part. Some information given there was actually false. Lectures can be made more interesting and just don"t repeat what is written on the slides.» - I think one should be forced to use surfaces when designing parts in catia. I also think more focus could have been spent on rdnt because i found it useful, but did not get into it enough to learn much. I dont think there need to be a final like the one we had now. It was stupid!» - More focus on drafting rules and standards. And more guidance on RD&T, perhaps an exercise guided by teacher?» - There must be a way to make the geometry assurance part clearer.» - Some greater degree of theory perhaps» - I don"t now if i think the exam is good. It"s much more important with the project than with the exam.» - Shortening down the number of lectures, maybe with less material on each slide. Also, when intorducing RD&T, it would be more giving and less tiring to have that lecture in a computer room so you can test the program as the lecture goes. » - Make new slides Change the project» - The way of giving the lecture because it is quite slow and sometimes with examples is easier. I would focus more in projects» - The project, but much more thorough PM with demands for features and surface modeling.» - No exam or lectures about the mathematical methods behind a cad program. Learning by doing is better, perhaps exercises instead of lectures where you get to do things yourself with the guidance of a teacher. Instead of listening to someone listing every button in a program very rapidly. Not good for the learning.» - Lectures and lectures slides could be improved.» - Reduce lectures and focus more on CATIA and RD&T. I think it is better to change from final exam to oral exam.» - More lectures in computer rooms and not like seminars. More clearly defined what to learn for the exam. » - The lectures! Even though Lars has limited english skills, he must be able to make the lectures more interesting!» - More interesting lectures thanks! Maybe making an excavator was a too big project, because it took very long time to make it look REAL. And what"s the point doing things if they don"t look real. I want to work like they do in real life CAD modeling!» - less theory and more practice or deeper theory and less program in class» - The written exam. Haven"t ever seen such a bad exam.» - Course material, need more information about the sub topics» - harder project.» - Less lecture and more practical exercises» - Lectures - people were sleeping in most of them because of irrelevance to CAD use.» 17. Additional comments- i think most of the students are there to learn catia. maybe start up a pure catia course»- I think that there sholud be more lectures in the later weeks of the course» - -» - Be more clear on why we learn the things you go through on the lectures, because we we sit there it is so booring. But when I read it at home before the examination I thought it was quite interesting actually.» - I think its bad to divide the groups in us and them. Sure, the product development people should get to know eachother, but isn"t it better if they learn to cooperate with peoples with different point of veiws as well? They would probably get to know eachother anyway during their two years together. I think also that they have been favorized during the whole course. » - There was NO course evaluation or improvement activities during the course. NO course evaluators, NO meetings, NO means to influence bad lecture materials. While the project work is good and some lectures are useful, most lecture content must be made from scratch.» 18. What master program do you attend?52 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.28 - How does knowing matrix transformation functions for rotating 3D points in space help in professional CATIA use in a design department???» (Automotive engineering)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23%