Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Road Vehicle Aerodynamics Advanced, TME175

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-10-22 - 2009-11-06
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 83%
Kontaktperson: David Söderblom»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

10 svarande

At most 10 hours/week»0 0%
Around 15 hours/week»3 30%
Around 20 hours/week»1 10%
Around 25 hours/week»3 30%
At least 30 hours/week»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- Varying a lot!» (Around 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 10%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 20%
100%»7 70%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- Good lectures from Sinija, should have been some lecture of the softwares we used» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

10 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 20%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 40%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Not that necessary, thou!» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 11%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»8 88%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.88

- dont know» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

Teaching and course administration

5. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»4 40%
Some extent»3 30%
Large extent»3 30%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.9

- we had no literature more than Bernard» (Small extent)
- Well there were not much litterature...» (Some extent)
- Could have been more examples of CFD simulations.» (Some extent)

6. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts, contact with supervisors etc work?

10 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»6 60%
Very well»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- Web page and such thinks worked ok! But according to me the supervisors should have helped the groups equally. It was not obvious from the beginning that you could get that much help from them. But when helped was needed they were very helpfull. » (Rather well)

Study climate

7. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 10%
Rather good»3 30%
Very good»6 60%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- » (Rather poor)
- As mentioned before it was okay when help was required, but the supervisors could have been telling things that we should need to know to all groups. » (Rather good)
- It would be good to have opportunities where David and Christoffer is down in the CFD-room so they can help and we can ask question. Now we had to go up to them all the time when we had questions.» (Rather good)
- David and Christoffer have been very helpful and available whenever help was needed» (Very good)
- David and Christoffer were always avaible.» (Very good)

8. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

10 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 10%
Rather well»3 30%
Very well»6 60%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Inside the group it went nicely, but other groups were not respecting booking of computers in the extent they should. » (Rather poorly)

9. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»10 100%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Generally I would have prefered some more lectures in vehicle aerodynamics.» (Adequate)
- Pretty much decided myself how much work i"d like to put in to it» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

10. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 20%
Adequate»2 20%
Good»4 40%
Excellent»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- It would have been good if the case setup process could be speed up a bit so that there was some more time (and maybe even a lecture could be held) for analyzing the result» (Fair)
- I had higher hopes, but otherwise good.» (Adequate)
- If there will be more lecture of the software and also from Sinija this will be an excellent course.» (Good)

11. What is your impression of the lectures?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 10%
Adequate»5 50%
Good»3 30%
Excellent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- Too much theory and no clear explanation about things that we didn"t have enough background about. » (Adequate)

12. How would you rate the project work?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 20%
Good»6 60%
Excellent»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 4

13. What did you think about the project layout?

How would you rate the project layout with pre-processing, solving and analysis?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 30%
Good»6 60%
Excellent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- Should have better guidelines/instructions for the pre-processing and solving so more time can be spent on the analysis.» (Adequate)
- You get to do the entire process, and that is very positive» (Good)
- a quick review of how to use the tools (ansa, harpoon, fluent) wouldn"t hurt. too much time was spent on redoing simulation due to wrong settings in fluent» (Good)
- Good with project group meetings» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The project itself!»
- The layout of the course.»
- Project, Sinijas lectures, pro»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- More guidens from the supervisors, so get an increased knowledge of what different parameters is doing in the program. »
- More CFD examples for the real world»
- More information about the softwares and tell all small tips that we missed. It will save a lot of time for students! It would also be good if each group could have one computer, it would help a lot. »
- »

16. Additional comments

- I felt like some groups and persons were favorits at the supervisors and that they got a lot more help, pesonally I would prefer if every group gets the same explanations even if they not search for it. Or at least telling the students that from the beginning.»
- A good and interesting course in general, David and Christoffer should be more invloved and try to be more close to the students, help and support as much they can. Would be good to have some excercis-opportunities. Otherwise an really interesting course!»
- Though the title says it is Advanced RVAD, there was nothing advanced about it. This course was all about pressing buttons!!! Even a 10th grade student could do it. U do not need to be in masters level to pass this course. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från