ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPRSS: RRY090 Galaxies and observational cosmology Sp1, 09/10, RRY090

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-10-20 - 2009-11-06
Antal svar: 5
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Arto Heikkilä»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

5 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 100%
Around 20 hours/week»0 0%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

5 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 60%
100%»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.4

- not 100% due to having more than one course at the same time» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

5 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

5 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 80%
No, the goals are set too high»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

- the goals are ok if the prerequisites for the course were higher, i did not fulfill the requirements i think should be stated for this course.» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

5 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 40%
Yes, definitely»2 40%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»2 40%
Great extent»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- All I learnt was through the teaching» (Great extent)

7. How was the amount of teaching (two lectures per week)?

5 svarande

Too little»1 20%
Adequate»4 80%
Too much»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.8

- An additional lecture or exercise class every other week or something would have been great» (Too little)
- It was good like it was now, but more classes would also be nice.» (Adequate)

8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»2 50%
Great extent»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- I didn"t use the book. But the exercices sheet was good.» (?)
- Large number of exercises with solutions and good reading guidelines is great in my book» (Great extent)

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

5 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»1 20%
Very well»4 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- Good use of the studieportal» (Very well)

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

5 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 20%
Very good»3 60%
I did not seek help»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Excellent reactions to questions.» (Very good)

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

5 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»4 80%
Very well»0 0%
I did not seek cooperation»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

12. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 20%
Adequate»4 80%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- Nearly nothing to do at home for this course.» (Low)

13. How was the total workload this study period?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 20%
Adequate»2 40%
High»2 40%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

Summarizing questions

14. What is your opinion of the project (reading and presenting a scientific paper)?

5 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

The project was not useful, I learned only a little»0 0%
The project was useful, I learned much»3 60%
The project was very useful, I learned very much»2 40%
The level of the paper was too high»0 0%
The level of the paper was adequate»4 80%
The level of the paper was too low»0 0%

- Nice project, similar projects should be in almost every course in my opinion» (The project was useful, I learned much)
- Presentations was a very good idea, it gives a very good summary and overview of the course. Plus it is made by student, giving a new approach on the same things.» (The project was very useful, I learned very much, The level of the paper was adequate)

15. What is your general impression of the course?

5 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»3 60%
Excellent»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.4

- Interesting course, good introduction do cosmology.» (Good)

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The course was mostly very good»
- the paper project, the notes of the galaxies part were a really good summary of the content of the book.»
- Dual approach of the topic (from cosmology and from galaxies)»

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Maybe some additional lectures as there is a lot of material»
- - more recommended problems about cosmology should be available - the prerequisites -see next comment- - adding a visit to an observatory -if possible..-»
- Maybe some home assignements could be a good thing.»

18. Additional comments

- I strongly think the requirements for the course should be higher. I have learned a lot -even though I do not know yet if enough for passing..-, and the course was very interesting, but I felt a lack of background. Some basic courses about astrophysics should be stated in the syllabus as compulsory or at least strongy recommended.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från