Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPRSS: RRY080 Radar Systems and Applications Sp1, 09/10, RRY080

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-10-20 - 2009-11-06
Antal svar: 5
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Arto Heikkilä»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

5 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 60%
Around 20 hours/week»2 40%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.4

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

5 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 20%
50%»3 60%
75%»0 0%
100%»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- Because I had collision with other courses-» (25%)
- Could not attend all because of other lectures colliding with them.» (50%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

5 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 20%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- The teacher also provided an overview of these goals.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

5 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»3 60%
No, the goals are set too high»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

5 svarande

No, not at all»1 20%
To some extent»2 40%
Yes, definitely»1 20%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- It was way to difficult to reflect the course in a fair way!» (To some extent)
- But it was too long.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 60%
Large extent»2 40%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- Since I only could attend about 50% of them...» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 20%
Large extent»4 80%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- see question 6» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

5 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 20%
Rather well»2 40%
Very well»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- All announcements and handouts etc were uploaded well before time.» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

5 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 20%
Very good»2 40%
I did not seek help»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.2

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

5 svarande

Very poorly»1 20%
Rather poorly»1 20%
Rather well»1 20%
Very well»2 40%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

11. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 40%
High»3 60%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

12. How was the total workload this study period?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
High»4 80%
Too high»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 4.2

- I read one extra course.» (High)
- I have read 150% this period so it has been a high workload for me.» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

5 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 20%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»3 60%
Excellent»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- Some areas need to be clarified more to the students.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The MATLAB home work exercises. They are so much practical and help in understanding the concepts.»
- Home excercises, lab, study visit and SMHI lecture.»
- The home assignments, especially the second one.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The length of the exam.»
- More home work and very much smaller.»
- The lectures about SAR/ISAR and most defenetly the lectures and "tutorial"(??) about the ambiguity function. Did not learn much at all from those, especially the ones about the ambiguity function.»

16. Additional comments

- Very difficult exam!!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från