ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPRSS: RRY020 Radio and Microwave Engineering Sp1, 09/10, RRY020

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-10-20 - 2009-11-06
Antal svar: 15
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Arto Heikkilä»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 14%
Around 20 hours/week»4 28%
Around 25 hours/week»6 42%
Around 30 hours/week»1 7%
At least 35 hours/week»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.64

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

15 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»6 40%
100%»9 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

- only miss one lecture in which exercise 4 was solved» (100%)
- just miss two lectures because i came late» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

15 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 6%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 33%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»9 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

15 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 6%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»13 86%
No, the goals are set too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Without any background in electrical engineering (what so ever), the goals where set a little to hight for a 7.5hp course.» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

15 svarande

No, not at all»1 6%
To some extent»5 33%
Yes, definitely»9 60%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.53

- In exam only some selected topics were covered not the whole one. I know more then 80% course on my finger tips, In exam, I know the thing and how they are calculated but only because of formula I can"t able to solve problem, I mean it should be an open book exam.» (No, not at all)
- The course is very extensive, hence some parts of the course was not really covered in the examination» (To some extent)
- An oral exam (like a problem to be solved at the board) could be a good way to really assess what the student understood/learnt from the course» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»6 40%
Large extent»9 60%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- All teachers use almost exclusively PowerPoint. That can at times be very hard to follow unfortunately!» (Some extent)
- The exercises were however very good. Normal lectures were not as giving as it could have been. I think a redefinition as to the focus of the lectures should be done. Understanding the important formulas and theories are more important that a quick "go-through" deriving the formulas, which is already in the book anyways. » (Large extent)
- I think some more class activities should be add in the syllabus of this course for more better understanding.» (Large extent)
- Some teachers did not take enough time to explain the problem solutions/methods» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»10 66%
Great extent»5 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- Good course book» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

15 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»10 66%
Very well»5 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- This system threats everybody the same. It"s a very good system.» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

15 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 33%
Very good»10 66%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- Teachers were not always able to answer questions posed» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

15 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 6%
Rather well»6 40%
Very well»7 46%
I did not seek cooperation»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

11. How was the course workload?

15 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 46%
High»8 53%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

12. How was the total workload this study period?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 42%
High»8 57%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

15 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 6%
Adequate»1 6%
Good»9 60%
Excellent»4 26%

Genomsnitt: 4.06

- Well its too much course to be coevered in only like 30 working days and then quizes and labs, this course only touches the topics and does not give a very deep feeling about many things but a few» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- atleast the book»
- The Home assignments and bonus point system should be preserved as it gives you a fair chance of assesing your ownself throughout the course.»
- Homeworks were good and needed! Labs were very good too.»
- add more class activities like quizzes, assignment etc»
- open book exam»
- ADS»
- Extra points.»
- Bonus points system, private ADS access»
- ads tutorial and assignment »
- The labs.»
- Quiz and assignment sessions.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- well it should be considered what to be taught in more detail and what would be only introduced and also be mentioned in the goals of the course, also some pre reading should be recommended for students to cathc up with such vast course contents»
- The Labs should be given some points so that everyone take them more seriously inculding the Lab instructors:)»
- No point based quiz. I don"t think it"s a fair way of encourage visitors to lectures or reading the course literature. Time etc, are factors that play a part here. A quiz could, however, be handed out as preparations to the examination etc. Also, answers to the exercises in the literature is very sparse. If one does not have an answer to all the exercises, the exercises will not really help you. This applies also to the handed out examination. An exercise exam will not help unless correct solutions are available for something to learn from, or at least the answers. This should be provided! »
- More feedback for the quizzes! It"s of no use if we don"t get to see the correct answers and a short explanation afterwards. Less PowerPoint!»
- exam should be an open book»
- some industry visits or field trips will be more helpful for better understanding»
- Some teachers were not audible and hence their lecture was no understandable.»
- Mixers and oscillators.»
- The difference of difficulty level from one tutorial to another»
- no»
- The format of the lectures. Power point presentations are very unpedagogical. »
- More study hours.»

16. Additional comments

- Course is really good and very well planned.Although workload is a bit high.»
- thanks for the teahchers who are always very cooperative.»
- No»

Kursutvärderingssystem från