ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Humanoid robotics, TIF160/FIM800

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-11-13 - 2009-11-23
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 34%
Kontaktperson: Krister Wolff»

1. How do you rate the lectures?

Please write a comment.

10 svarande

Not good at all» 0 0%

Not so good» 0 0%

Neither good nor bad» 1 10%

Good» 4 40%

Very good» 5 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- However I would have liked the lectures to be more substantial.» (Good)
- Only partly relevant to the course (lab) requirements.» (Good)
- concentrated on the important information for the course and the tasks at hand.» (Very good)

2. To what extent have the lectures been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Not at all» 1 10%

Some extent» 4 40%

Large extent» 4 40%

Very large extent» 1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I was already familiar with most of the content.» (Not at all)

3. To what extent have the assignments been of help for your learning?

There were five assignments in the course.

10 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 0 0%

Large extent» 5 50%

Very large extent» 5 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

4. What is your impression of the course literature?

Course literature: Lecture notes, slides, and scientific papers

10 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Poor» 1 10%

Average» 3 30%

Good» 3 30%

Very good» 3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.8 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The little litterature availible was quite good, but in general some more litterature would have helped. (the references listed were also not updated - some links did not work)» (Poor)
- I would have preferred a little more guidance and directions on the reference papers.» (Good)
- The only problem was that the course literature is too much for a 7.5 credit course (one segment)» (Very good)
- I think its good to have literature written by the teacher, because it focuses on the things that are important for the course.» (Very good)

5. How well did the course administration, web page, communication etc. work?

10 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 0 0%

Rather well» 5 50%

Very well» 5 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Everything was extremely clear and defined.» (Very well)
- Clear deadlines, reasonably clear assigments from the beginning of the course! Very well done!» (Very well)

6. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

Hours per week include time in lectures, reading the course literature, working with home problems etc.

9 svarande

At most 15 hours» 1 11%

About 20 hours» 2 22%

About 25 hours» 1 11%

At least 30 hours» 5 55%

Genomsnitt: 3.11 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- 30 hours is a large underestimation. I"d say 40-50. It was very very intensive :D» (At least 30 hours)
- Extremely high workload» (At least 30 hours)
- The projects was to big and to time consuming.» (At least 30 hours)
- The projects took up too much time. It was too much to have to do both Kondo and BRH at the same time. A better solution should be to have Kondo at the same time as Hubert, since Hubert did not require as much time. Maybe a better solution should be to be able to choose between BRH and Hubert (and maybe add something to Hubert).» (At least 30 hours)

7. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

Less than 20%» 0 0%

20-40%» 0 0%

41-60%» 0 0%

61-80%» 0 0%

More than 80%» 10 100%

Genomsnitt: 5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

8. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help during the course?

10 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 1 10%

Rather good» 2 20%

Very good» 7 70%

I did not seek help» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Question and other things was alright. We needed more time with the Kundo robot. But as we were so many that was not possible.» (Very good)

9. How understandable are the course goals?

Note that a description of the course contents was given in the first lecture. You may wish to revisit the slides from that lecture.

9 svarande

Not at all understandable» 0 0%

Somewhat understandable» 4 44%

Completely understandable» 5 55%

Genomsnitt: 2.55 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It was not really clear what was required for each lab to pass and/or get 4 and 5 or what was the emphasis of each lab.» (Somewhat understandable)

10. Is the level of difficulty of the course reasonable, considering your background and the number of credits?

10 svarande

No, the level is too low» 0 0%

Yes, the level is reasonable» 6 60%

No, the level is too high» 4 40%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- The level is reasonable as long as all the group members are already familiar with the subject and the tools and have a clear idea of how to proceed. Which was NOT my case ,)» (Yes, the level is reasonable)
- Extremely high workload» (No, the level is too high)
- Its a good course, but the projects was to extensive. If one had not programmed in C# before it was to much work.» (No, the level is too high)

11. Did the examination reflect the contents of the course?

7 svarande

Not at all» 0 0%

No» 0 0%

To some extent» 1 14%

Yes» 4 57%

Yes, completely» 2 28%

Genomsnitt: 4.14 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- hum... was there an examination??...» (?)
- No exam, rather labs. The labs standars were a lot higher that the lecture"s though» (To some extent)

12. How do you rate the teaching and supervision during the lab assignments?

10 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Poor» 0 0%

Average» 2 20%

Good» 7 70%

Very good» 1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.9 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- 90% of the work had to be done at home» (Average)
- It was a little to less time, but it worked quite well in the end anyhow.» (Good)

13. How do you rate the level of difficulty of the lab work?

10 svarande

Very easy» 0 0%

Rather easy» 0 0%

Rather difficult» 8 80%

Very difficult» 2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.2 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- actually it was quite adequat, but unfortunatly that"s not in the list ,)» (Rather difficult)
- Difficult enough to make it challenging but still possible and manageable.» (Rather difficult)
- It depends very much on how much background your group has in C#, xml and programming such things.» (Rather difficult)
- Extremely high workload» (Very difficult)

14. To what extent has the lab work been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 2 20%

Large extent» 4 40%

Very large extent» 4 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.2 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

15. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 1 10%

High» 5 50%

Too high» 4 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I think the number of assignment can be reduced or the demands in them needs to be reconsidered. Their goals can be met but sticking with the standards and using the libraries provided demands us to understand the provided code before being able to write more code. If it was doing the code from scratch the course load is alright, but now this time needs to be considered.» (High)
- Too much work in a short period of time» (Too high)
- Extremely high workload» (Too high)
- 30h/week + is to much.» (Too high)

16. Would you recommend this course to other students? Why?

- definitly! a lot of practical work, that helped to understand the theory behind it.»
- Yes I would. IMO a must to learn how different subjects and areas come together in Robotics.»
- Yes. Interesting course with a very welcome practical approach.»
- It depends on if the lab work is the same ore not. From what i heard last year was more adequate workload. Its is a interesting and fun course but time consuming and good programing skills are needed.»
- Yes, lots of practical work which opens new horizons and useful theories to get introduced to. Image/Speech Synthesis, recognition and gait generation. »
- Yes, it"s a very fun course! Interesting topics.»

17. What is your overall impression of this course?

10 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Poor» 0 0%

Average» 0 0%

Good» 6 60%

Very good» 4 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

18. Is there anything you think should be changed until next year?

- the Kondo assignment was a lot of work compared with what one could learn from it.»
- No more groupwork... but that"s something I always say. Never been a fan of that :D»
- It would be nice to decrease the workload of the labs. Not necessarily to decrease the goals of the lab but maybe rather to remove one of the assignments (Kondo for example).»
- The Kondo lab should be changed a bit on the goals. With such an unacurate robot its more luck than good work if it makes a goal. Otherwise al the labs were good. But to much work, either make them smaller or skip one or two.»
- Yes, see comment above about changing the projects.»

19. Additional comments

- Matias Whade chould realy try to calm down. I dont think he will keep up if he is stressed like this al the time. Which would be a shame because he is a good teacher.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.67

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.67
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.76

Kursutvärderingssystem från