Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Quantum engineering, FKA131, MPNAN, HT2009, FKA131
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2009-10-16 - 2009-10-31 Antal svar: 11 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 36% Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Teknisk fysik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.11 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 3 | | 27% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 2 | | 18% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 4 | | 36% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 2 | | 18% |
Genomsnitt: 3.18 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 11 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 1 | | 9% |
75%» | | 2 | | 18% |
100%» | | 8 | | 72% |
Genomsnitt: 4.63
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?11 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 1 | | 9% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 4 | | 36% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 6 | | 54% |
Genomsnitt: 3.45 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.10 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 9 | | 90% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 1 | | 10% |
Genomsnitt: 2.1 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?11 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 2 | | 18% |
Yes, definitely» | | 3 | | 27% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 6 | | 54% |
Genomsnitt: 3.36
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?11 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 27% |
Large extent» | | 5 | | 45% |
Great extent» | | 3 | | 27% |
Genomsnitt: 3 - The course notes were quite helpful and much clearer and easier to read than the course book. Some sections of the notes, however, I found difficult to follow.» (Large extent)
7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?11 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 4 | | 36% |
Large extent» | | 7 | | 63% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.63 - The breadth of material covered in the book is nice but the explanations for their steps were for me often lacking or hard to understand clearly.» (Some extent)
8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?10 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 4 | | 40% |
Very well» | | 6 | | 60% |
Genomsnitt: 3.6
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?11 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 6 | | 54% |
Very good» | | 5 | | 45% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.45 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?11 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 9 | | 81% |
Very well» | | 2 | | 18% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.18 11. How was the course workload?11 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 18% |
High» | | 7 | | 63% |
Too high» | | 2 | | 18% |
Genomsnitt: 4 12. How was the total workload this study period?11 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 5 | | 45% |
High» | | 5 | | 45% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 9% |
Genomsnitt: 3.63 - Indeed the computer homework takes a large portion of time which we are supposed to dedicate to the course. So, I had to slash the time which I was ment to put on studying the concept and course book, instead.» (Adequate)
Course-specific questions:13. Would you prefer one teacher for the whole course or several, each specializing in a particular topic of the course?11 svarande
One» | | 6 | | 54% |
Maximum two» | | 1 | | 9% |
Maximum three» | | 0 | | 0% |
Each lecture should be given by a dedicated specialist» | | 1 | | 9% |
Does not matter» | | 3 | | 27% |
No opinion» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.45 14. What do you think about home assignments?11 svarande
Very bad idea» | | 1 | | 9% |
Bad idea» | | 0 | | 0% |
Neutral» | | 1 | | 9% |
Good idea» | | 8 | | 72% |
Very good idea» | | 1 | | 9% |
Genomsnitt: 3.72 - It consume lots of time so we did not get enough time for taking preparation for final exam» (Very bad idea)
- indeed it was nice to see what happens to an electron or an electron packet encountring some barriers. But the time cost is not proportional to what we learn.» (Neutral)
- Would have been nice with some easy introductory problems on each topic so that you get a hang of it before you start working with the actual Homework problems, which sometimes were very tricky. » (Good idea)
15. Did exercises help you learn the course material?11 svarande
No, they even hindered my learning» | | 0 | | 0% |
No, it was a waste of time» | | 1 | | 9% |
Cannot say» | | 1 | | 9% |
Yes, they helped somewhat» | | 5 | | 45% |
Yes, they helped very much» | | 4 | | 36% |
Genomsnitt: 4.09 - If I had had the solutions to problems that I could not solve on my own sooner, it would have helped me understand newer topics much better as they came along. Also, studying for the exam would have been much easier.» (Yes, they helped somewhat)
- yes, especially solved problems !!!» (Yes, they helped very much)
Summarizing questions16. What is your general impression of the course?11 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 2 | | 18% |
Adequate» | | 4 | | 36% |
Good» | | 5 | | 45% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.27 - it"s better to have more emphasise on concepts rather than having only mathematic formulas.» (Adequate)
17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Accessibility of the teachers regarding help and feedback»
- Recitations, the number of h/w questions for each week - it"s reasonable.»
- Computer project, learned a lot.»
- The computer project had taken more than 80% of our time and we didnt had much time to do home work assignments. There is no purpose of the project.There is really less to learn from the project.»
- Giving course notes on the blackboard and the MATLAB project.»
18. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Better promotion of the afterwork and teachers should join»
- Handwritten slides -> typed slides
Computer project doesn"t leave much time to prepare for the exam/recitations, it should be changed somehow..»
- Hand out solutions earlier,e.g. two weeks after recitation.»
- There should some points of homework problems.»
- More time explaining Dirac notation and how it relates to the various other wave function representations like position and momentum would be nice.
A textbook with more clear explanations should be sought.»
19. Additional comments- It would be very useful to students unfamiliar with QM to give more guidance on how to attack problems. Even when they are
motivated to work on them, this may prevent them from actually learning from these exercises.»
- .»
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|