ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Fundamentals of micro- and nanotechnology, FKA196, MPNAN, HT2009, FKA196

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-10-15 - 2009-10-31
Antal svar: 37
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 52%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Teknisk fysik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

37 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 17 45%

Around 20 hours/week» 14 37%

Around 25 hours/week» 3 8%

Around 30 hours/week» 3 8%

At least 35 hours/week» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.78

- Spent most of the time during the last week before the exam.» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

37 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 3 8%

75%» 14 37%

100%» 20 54%

Genomsnitt: 4.45

- I was away two weeks of the quarter, but i attend the classes when i was here» (50%)
- i am not clear about this question» (50%)
- I couldnt attend only two lectures due to other course"s laboration.» (75%)
- Arrived 2 weeks late because of which I missed 3 lectures» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

37 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 4 10%

The goals are difficult to understand» 2 5%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 13 35%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 18 48%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

- Like I have mentioned before I arrived 2 weeks late and hence have missed out on all the initial things.» (I have not seen/read the goals)
- Some topics were really short presented and for those topics were only a few books named» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- maybe just because there is too much for me to digest» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

34 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 1 2%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 31 91%

No, the goals are set too high» 2 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.02

- I guess....» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

35 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 13 37%

Yes, definitely» 9 25%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 13 37%

Genomsnitt: 3

- I have never done a quiz-exam before. Don"t know if I like it or not...» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

37 svarande

Small extent» 3 8%

Some extent» 11 29%

Large extent» 18 48%

Great extent» 5 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.67

- The PowerPoint slides were a bit messy. They were often so cluttered with formulas that the main message was hard to discover. » (Some extent)
- a bit lame lectures sometimes, more energy from the lecturer would be good.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

37 svarande

Small extent» 7 18%

Some extent» 13 35%

Large extent» 16 43%

Great extent» 1 2%

Genomsnitt: 2.29

- Haven"t used any book at all.» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

37 svarande

Very badly» 1 2%

Rather badly» 1 2%

Rather well» 23 62%

Very well» 12 32%

Genomsnitt: 3.24

- We did not get any information until the second last week about the poster project, which we should be finished just before the exam. Better planning would be desirable.» (Very badly)
- Some of the quizes with multiple correct answers only allow one answer to be given. Was it developed for some specific browser? My firewall caught several "attacks" while I answered the quizes.» (Rather badly)
- The information about the literature project should be available at the beginning of the course and not 3 weeks before deadline.» (Rather well)
- We could have been given more information about how to make the posters. The lab-groups could have been signd up to in the study-portal.» (Rather well)
- A bit unorganized titles of the lecturenotes but otherwise good.» (Rather well)
- Most things seemed to happen at the last minute, though.» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

37 svarande

Very poor» 1 2%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 16 43%

Very good» 14 37%

I did not seek help» 6 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.64

- Practically none.» (Very poor)
- If you ask a question you would get it answerd.» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

37 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 3 8%

Rather well» 13 35%

Very well» 20 54%

I did not seek cooperation» 1 2%

Genomsnitt: 3.51

- Had a good cooperation when producing quiz-questions and working with the psoter.» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

37 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 5 13%

Adequate» 26 70%

High» 3 8%

Too high» 3 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

12. How was the total workload this study period?

37 svarande

Too low» 1 2%

Low» 2 5%

Adequate» 21 56%

High» 9 24%

Too high» 4 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

37 svarande

Poor» 2 5%

Fair» 2 5%

Adequate» 9 24%

Good» 22 59%

Excellent» 2 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

- I hate chemistry, and it was all about it» (Poor)
- As a general overview and introduction yes. Contains lots of details which can not be grasped in the short time.» (Adequate)
- the teacher should say "hello" before he starts his lecture. I got the impression he was on stand by between the lectures and just proceed where he stopped.» (Good)
- A good start with a good overview of the subject.» (Good)
- I felt this was a very valuable survey course introducing lots of important things that give us a much better idea what to expect.» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the qiuz based exam»
- Laboratory exercises. They give a good overview on the learned material, as well as provide students with real experience.»
- The labs. Interesting to see what we had talked about, event though we were not allowed to touch. Keep the quizzes, it"s valuable to discuss them with your teammates.»
- Getting know the Clean Room environment.»
- The labs in the clean room!»
- The poster conferance, the lectures were good, the concept of quizes have grown to my liking.»
- more lab. work would be fine. It would be more helpful to understand the lecture part. Anyway, it is just a suggestion.»
- poster presentation and visit to clean room.»
- The laboration sessions, quizzes and literature project.»
- The idea about presenting a poster instead of a report with presentation is a very good alternative. »
- The quiz-based exam is a great veraity to other courses.»
- Actually there are a large amount of concepts in this course that is not fair for a single 7.5 credits course in just one quarter!!!»
- The lab exercises. Old quizzes on the homepage.»
- the quizzes»
- Labs»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- more clean room practice?»
- Quality of quiz quesitons. The students are not that well encouraged to post really polished questions without any logic and/or language faults.»
- Try to update the quizzes more often. We still haven"t recieved the last batch, and the exam is in a week.»
- The corrections of quiz questions should be made by a team aprroved by the instructor of the course.»
- Maybe next year the examinator shouldn´,t go for a two week conferens in the middle of the period. The order of the labs is a bit strange. If safety is as important as it comes across then begin with it, then have the demo lab is process lab 1, so we can follow a wafer which is later cut into dies which we use for the photolithography lab. »
- they are doing fine, maybe nothing need to be changed. I just think of adding some lectures given by some profeesors or scholars which demonstrate the new and hot things they are doing. It would be more interesting and helpful to know what should or could we do in the future.»
- none.»
- faster and more frequent quiz question updates maybe minus points for bad questions?»
- A more clear guidelines on how to present the poster since many students haven"t done this before.»
- Didn"t like that some of the alternatives in the exam were changed from what we have been studing on.»
- In my opinion, because of the high work-load of the course, the lecturers should not teach all the concepts and also not examine them. they can customize some important parts of the course in the way that they have time to go in detail and explain them thoroughly instead of pointing all the materials and examine all of them.»
- Info about the poster project must be sent out earlier, not just 2 weeks before deadline! The poster project might as well be in the middle of the period when the over all workload is lower. Skip the company visit or go somewhere else, and do it earlier instead of the last week!»
- the mail grouping.»
- The way the teacher corrected the asignments»

16. Additional comments

- Instead of splitting student into only quiz-making groups, they can be divided into three different types: quiz-making, quiz-checking ("opponents") and "referees". Each week they are changing the roles. Incorrect quiz questions do not give points, thus providing better questions.»
- The instructors and the stuff of MC2 were very helpful. They really made a great effort to teach something especially in the cleanroom. It is really hard to guide lots of students in different times in MC2. I appreciate for their help and effort for us.»
- I enjoyed it»
- If can be more trained to enter clean room, it would be better.»
- Avgust seems to be rather stressed, too stressed to be able to take the role as being representative for the course. Students get feeling of disturbing instead of having an encouraging communication in order to increase the enthusiasm for the course. I heard that some students got incorrectly accused of plagiarizing. This could have been done a little bit more subtle.»
- The exam"s questions should be properly stated and corrected before the exam and not after.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från