ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Introduction to microsystems packaging, MKM105, MPMIC, HT2009, MKM105

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-10-15 - 2009-10-31
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 42%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 3 27%

Around 20 hours/week» 3 27%

Around 25 hours/week» 5 45%

Around 30 hours/week» 0 0%

At least 35 hours/week» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.18

- It was a new and different system for me, I have no experience of this system before» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 1 9%

50%» 0 0%

75%» 3 27%

100%» 7 63%

Genomsnitt: 4.45

- I missed out on the first few lectures because I arrived late by 2 weeks.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 3 27%

The goals are difficult to understand» 1 9%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 2 18%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 5 45%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

- missed the initial information sessions because I arrived late by 2 weeks» (I have not seen/read the goals)
- It"s unclear whenever the homeworks are compulsory? I would like to know how the results of the homeworks and the litterature-project are calculated in the final grade for the course.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- but the time for me was less as I said because of new system» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 1 10%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 9 90%

No, the goals are set too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.9

- It was on a resonable level.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

No, not at all» 1 9%

To some extent» 2 18%

Yes, definitely» 3 27%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 5 45%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

- Thought it coverd the most.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent» 1 9%

Some extent» 5 45%

Large extent» 5 45%

Great extent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.36

- But tutorials sessions and lab sessions were great.» (Small extent)
- It was a mix of the lectures, the book and the handed out materials.» (Some extent)
- I cannot say great because I missed some 2 lectures» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent» 3 27%

Some extent» 1 9%

Large extent» 6 54%

Great extent» 1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.45

- only used the e-book 2 or 3 times.» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly» 1 9%

Rather badly» 2 18%

Rather well» 6 54%

Very well» 2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

- This could be better. Time-Edit should be updated so it is correct for all courses. » (Rather badly)
- Time table changed almost every week, which was annoying» (Rather well)
- Well organized and quick updates» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor» 1 9%

Rather poor» 1 9%

Rather good» 5 45%

Very good» 4 36%

I did not seek help» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

- Assistants of the course were really helpful (Carl, lab guys, etc.) but Johan was not helpful about problems.» (Rather good)
- Carl was quick on answering mail» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly» 1 9%

Rather poorly» 0 0%

Rather well» 6 54%

Very well» 4 36%

I did not seek cooperation» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

11. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 1 9%

Adequate» 7 63%

High» 1 9%

Too high» 2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- It was to much in study-week 7. Presentations and laborations could have been spreaded out over the last 2-3 weeks. » (High)
- If there is any other upper option other than "Too High" I would have clicked that» (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 2 18%

Adequate» 4 36%

High» 3 27%

Too high» 2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

- It was ok beacause the other course wasn"t too heavy.» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor» 1 9%

Fair» 1 9%

Adequate» 5 45%

Good» 4 36%

Excellent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

- It was a good first course for the programme.» (Adequate)
- I found the course very interesting as I expected» (Good)
- A good introduction to get everyone to an even level regardless of their study background» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the lab work, very interesting»
- The new type of tutorials that were introduced with disscutions in groups were good.»
- The new tutorial mode»
- Powerpoints on the homepage»
- The project»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- nothing, I think everything fits me »
- The workload should be minimized»
- Less events in week 7. The company visit, lab C and the project-presentation should be spread out so that they are not so late in the course. »
- Better preperation of the exam.»
- It should be a way for students to make up if they don"t attend a lab session/study visit/homework.»
- More information to everyone about how the project should look and what is expected. Stop students presenting more than the specified time (if u have 15 minutes u can"t expect to read through 51 slides!!).»
- number of people doing the project»

16. Additional comments

- null»
- Thankyou»
- Johan is an enthusiastic lecturer that is fun to listen to. The lectures give a lot more then just the slides alone.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från