ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Fiber Optical Communication, MCC100, MPMPE, HT2009, MCC100

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-10-15 - 2009-10-31
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 43%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

13 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»6 46%
Around 25 hours/week»5 38%
Around 30 hours/week»2 15%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.69

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

13 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 15%
75%»4 30%
100%»7 53%

Genomsnitt: 4.38

- The teaching was good... especially considering the relatively large number of lectureres.» (75%)
- 3 missed lectures.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

13 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 15%
The goals are difficult to understand»2 15%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 38%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 2.84

- They are very short.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

13 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 7%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»8 61%
No, the goals are set too high»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 2.23

- MPMPE students were already introduced to most of the coursce material» (No, the goals are set too low)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

13 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»10 76%
Yes, definitely»2 15%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

- It was way more different from what we saw in class and exercise sessions» (To some extent)
- I found some questions on the exam a bit weird. » (To some extent)
- The exam was much harder than any of the exercises covered in the booklet and in lectures.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 41%
Large extent»6 50%
Great extent»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- So many lecturers for this course was not a good idea. Only the lectures delivered by Peter were understandable. Rest of the Lectures were just time pass.» (?)
- Pontus is a great lecturer keep up the good work!» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»1 7%
Some extent»5 38%
Large extent»7 53%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.46

- The lecture notes are good.» (Some extent)
- The printed lecture slides are very helpful. » (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

13 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»9 69%
Very well»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- 1 home assignment handout was 2 days late.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 38%
Very good»7 53%
I did not seek help»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.69

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

13 svarande

Very poorly»1 7%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»7 53%
Very well»5 38%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

11. How was the course workload?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 30%
High»3 23%
Too high»6 46%

Genomsnitt: 4.15

- Assignments were quite difficult.» (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 7%
Adequate»3 23%
High»7 53%
Too high»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

13 svarande

Poor»1 7%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»4 30%
Good»7 53%
Excellent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

- Exercise sessions should be more synchronized with the lectures» (Poor)
- The exam was harder than the rest of the course reflected» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The tutor exercises we had on Fridays.»
- The home assignments and the guest lecture.»
- the labs are very informative and shud be preserved for the future»
- Pontus»
- Labs, I learnt a lot from the laboratory sessions. The home assignments were also good but these increased the workload.»
- The labs and exercises »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The workload is high and rewards in term of bonus points for handins is too low.»
- Skip the project work.»
- Being 4 people at a lab is 1 too many.»
- Better prepaired exercise sessions,»
- Tutorials assistant should be changed. He did not help much for the questions which he did not solve before.»
- This course needs more tutorial or problem solving session. The one tutorial session per week is not adequate.»
- The assignments, they are too long and sometimes not clear»

16. Additional comments

- No additional comments.»
- Exam questions provide the student with lots of given and this confuses more than it helps to find a good way of solving the problems»
- i would reccomend some more weight be given to the assignements since they take a lot of time and giving just 1 extra point on final exam is a bit unfair.»
- thanks for a nice course»
- Exam was too difficult but the level of teaching was not that much good.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från