ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Introduction to microwave and photonics engineering, MCC036, MPMPE, HT2009, MCC036

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-10-15 - 2009-10-31
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 27%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

10 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 20%
Around 20 hours/week»3 30%
Around 25 hours/week»3 30%
Around 30 hours/week»2 20%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- the course corse core concepts should be understand carefully.» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 10%
50%»1 10%
75%»2 20%
100%»6 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.3

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

10 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 20%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 40%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 3

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»7 77%
No, the goals are set too high»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 2.22

- BUT THE STUDY SYSTEM DIFFER FROM MY COUNTRY» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 44%
Yes, definitely»1 11%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»4 44%

Genomsnitt: 3

- if there will be an oral exame also,the students will prepare all the topics with clear concepts.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»1 10%
Some extent»1 10%
Large extent»7 70%
Great extent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 30%
Large extent»4 40%
Great extent»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3

- the books give more understanding and other materials just guide me and help to summarise in comprehensive manner.» (Large extent)

8. Did you buy the textbooks?

10 svarande

No»3 30%
Only the microwave book»3 30%
Only the photonics book»0 0%
Yes, both»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- The price of one textbook is very expensive. I just have e-books and printed them.» (No)
- there should be an arrangements for one track guys to loan the other track book at least for two quarter periods. becoz in library there are only 2 or 3 books available.» (Only the microwave book)
- BUT THE BOOK PRICE IS SO HIGH HERE.IT IS DIFFICULT FOR A FOREIGN STUDENT.» (Yes, both)

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

10 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»5 50%
Very well»5 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

9 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 33%
Very good»6 66%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- the answer of hans was a bit confusing, but sheila gives the best and clear answers and sheila mud card is very help full for the guys they hisitate to ask in class.» (Very good)

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

10 svarande

Very poorly»1 10%
Rather poorly»1 10%
Rather well»6 60%
Very well»2 20%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- probably due to new or i don"t know why.» (Very poorly)

12. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 20%
Adequate»2 20%
High»5 50%
Too high»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- AS THE STUDY SYSTEM IS DIFFERENT FROM MY COUNTRY SO IT IS HARD TO MAINTAIN THE COURSE LOAD.» (High)

13. How was the total workload this study period?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 40%
High»3 30%
Too high»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- difficult to cover whole two courses all.» (Too high)

Course-specific questions:

14. Has the MUD card system been helpful for your learning?

MUD cards were used to give feedback on Most Unclear Discussion during each lecture in the photonics part of the course.

10 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
Just a bit»0 0%
Yes, quite a bit»4 40%
Yes, very much so»6 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- I think some of them were not replied...» (Yes, quite a bit)
- I would like to have smaller MUD cards, enviromental friendly MUD cards ,)» (Yes, very much so)
- BECAUSE IT DEALS ABOUT DIFFERENT PROBLEMS OF UNDERSTANDING FROM DIFFERENT STUDENTS POINT OF VIEW» (Yes, very much so)
- especially others mud card questions» (Yes, very much so)

15. Were the tutorials in the microwave part helpful for your learning?

9 svarande

No, not at all»1 11%
Just a bit»2 22%
Yes, quite a bit»3 33%
Yes, very much so»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

16. Were the tutorials in the photonics part helpful for your learning?

10 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
Just a bit»2 20%
Yes, quite a bit»4 40%
Yes, very much so»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

17. Were the microwave parts of the labs helpful for your learning?

10 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
Just a bit»0 0%
Yes, quite a bit»5 50%
Yes, very much so»5 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

18. Were the photonics parts of the labs helpful for your learning?

10 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
Just a bit»0 0%
Yes, quite a bit»4 40%
Yes, very much so»6 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

Summarizing questions

19. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 20%
Good»4 40%
Excellent»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.2

- AS IT IS INTERESTING.» (Excellent)
- a very nice start for both the fields. i like it» (Excellent)

20. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Everything is ok.»
- I think the labs and home assignments are good for students to understand more clearly about the lecture»
- MUD card system,»
- MUD CARD.»
- Smith Chart, Labs»
- every thing»
- MUD card, but for both microwave and photonic part»

21. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- the price of the binder!»
- Everything is ok.»
- The home assignments should be have some credits to reduce the pressure of final exam.»
- I think there should be temwork assignments included. Also, the Tutorial in Microwave part should be improved.»
- IT WOULD BE VARY GOOD FOR STUDENTS IF YOU PROVIDE THE PRINTED VERSION OF YOUR LECTURE.»
- Teaching Style in Photonics»
- work load»
- tutorials,they are not in the path of what has been asked in the exam, and could not help to solve exersises as well»

22. Additional comments

- the microwaves part in the 2nd lab should be improved»
- No comments.»
- IT WOULD BE BETTER IF U DEAL IN THE CLASS SOME PART OF THE PREVIOUS EXAMINATION PAPER ONE BY ONE ,WHEN U THINK THE COMPLETED LECTURE PART IS ENOUGH TO UNDERSTAND THE PROBLEM INSTEAD OF DEALING IT LATER ON. SO STUDENTS KNOW WHAT THEY HAVE TO FACE.»
- yes ther teachers should be syncronized, as an example the hans teach the Smitch chart in one way.And we saw different method of Smith chart in tutorial.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från