Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Visual brand identity and product design (2009), MPP105

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-10-21 - 2009-11-02
Antal svar: 28
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 63%
Kontaktperson: Oskar Rexfelt»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

27 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»3 11%
Around 25 hours/week»12 44%
Around 30 hours/week»11 40%
At least 35 hours/week»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- way to much» (Around 30 hours/week)
- Might have been more, the hours spent on the project flew away faster then we could count them.» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

28 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 3%
75%»8 28%
100%»19 67%

Genomsnitt: 4.64

- To early. 8-9 am when rest of the day is empty is not the best, although I understand the problems involved with the kind of lecturers the course had.» (75%)
- I hurt my ankle and missed a couple of lectures» (75%)
- I missed classes because I was sick in the beginning of the course. » (75%)
- In general a lot of interesting lectures, but some where overlapping.» (100%)
- Very good lecturers» (100%)
- I missed just one lecture.» (100%)
- There was some problems with the attendance lists, sometimes it skipped a few seats or a row when it was passed around.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

28 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 10%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 3%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»12 42%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»12 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.17

- Kind of pompous» (The goals are difficult to understand)
- a little fuzzy, but it was not a problem.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

25 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»24 96%
No, the goals are set too high»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.04

- The goals is aim really high.» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

27 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»7 25%
Yes, definitely»16 59%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»4 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

- It is what you make it to..which is GOOD!» (To some extent)
- To bad that the plans for the presentations didn"t work out as planned. Always motivating to present to people that isn"t a part of the school world.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

28 svarande

Small extent»1 3%
Some extent»3 10%
Large extent»12 42%
Great extent»12 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- The lectures were very good and interesting!!!» (Great extent)
- Probably havent learned as much in any course before» (Great extent)
- The large selection of external lecturers gave the course an professional edge that I wish all courses on Chalmers contained.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

28 svarande

Small extent»2 7%
Some extent»11 39%
Large extent»8 28%
Great extent»7 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

- Good thing that the articles were given from the start.» (Small extent)
- Interesting to read the articles. They wewe up to date (most of them). » (Large extent)
- The reports on the work of previous years was very interesting and something that should be implemented in other courses as well.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

28 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»3 10%
Rather well»17 60%
Very well»8 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.17

- Time edit didn"t match the schedule. The computer disk area of the course didn"t work.» (Rather badly)
- problems with the extra space for the course, the groups.» (Rather badly)
- Use time edit» (Rather well)
- Problems with booking of sessions.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

27 svarande

Very poor»1 3%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»8 29%
Very good»16 59%
I did not seek help»2 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- The project meetings felt a bit short at times.» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

27 svarande

Very poorly»1 3%
Rather poorly»5 18%
Rather well»6 22%
Very well»15 55%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.29

- I will never work with French exchange students.» (Rather poorly)
- Difficult to work with people that are not so good at writing english.» (Rather well)
- We did not have clear leadership in the group which maybe would have been better» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

28 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»10 35%
High»16 57%
Too high»2 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- low in the beginning. High the lant 3 weeks.» (Adequate)
- high but it was worth it» (High)
- On the edge of to high but the reason for that is the amount of work that we put into our project. » (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

28 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»11 39%
High»7 25%
Too high»10 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.96

- low in the middle of the course.» (Adequate)
- This course pushed our other hand-in a week ahead» (Too high)
- two very time consuming courses at the same time. However, the IDE - methodology and theory course was useful to the VBI course in terms of literature. » (Too high)
- I"m not a strong reader.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

28 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 3%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»12 42%
Excellent»15 53%

Genomsnitt: 4.46

- good and interesting course with alot of inspiring lectures.» (Good)
- info graphic lecture would be greate. Heard that infographics have been included in this curse before.» (Good)
- Some part of the course administration could have been better. However the content of the course was extremely usefull. » (Excellent)
- Many lecturers from different design companies are very interesting and impressive.» (Excellent)
- Good lectures, interesting work.» (Excellent)
- very relevant» (Excellent)
- Very good lectures and an important feature in understanding the world basically.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- I think we need more tutorials for this course and for the project.»
- The lectures and the project work.»
- The external lecturers»
- The great lecturers»
- The ilteresting lectures. Electrolux.»
- the project work»
- The lectures from big names from the industry.»
- All brilliant lecturers and the literature, i.e. articles. »
- good lectures with successful designers and companies»
- guest lectures, Electrolux, Mr De la Vega and so on»
- Analizing existing brand, Creating a brand, workshop with fast analyse and creation of our brand. »
- The guest lectures were great! Very inspiring to hear such prominent people from the industry speaking! That motivated me to attend every single lecture just because it was so interesting! I also liked the high degree of freedom within the projects, like developing our own methods etc.»
- all the good lecturers should be kept. maybe not exactly the same people, but people that have a lot of experience in big companies and so on»
- The lecturer»
- The packaging theme was very interesting! »
- the lectures»
- The guest lectures.»
- The obligatory read of the course articles, they were relevant and I learned a great deal from reading them. »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- cannot define»
- Better administration. »
- Not that interesting to read papers about previous courses, more papers on industrial case studies.»
- Shorter time for the reserch part.»
- No last minute poster.»
- The parallell course needs to aquire less work, since the course is so demanding. By making it worth more than 7,5 hp and adding another, smaller course one might get some spare time....»
- I did not see quite any bad aspect in the course»
- time to work on part one o project should be shortened to give more time on part two»
- Nothing»
- different litteratures »
- more time to the second part of the course (50/50 instead of (60/40)»
- some articles are too redondant...»
- The amount of references to volvo & saab during lectures. I have heard and read about volvos design features for three years now ,). »

16. Additional comments

- it"s great to have guesters to give lectures. but if we could get their ppts```that will be better»
- The lectures had a very high standard. The lecturers and their material were interesting, relevant and well prepared. The project was a very good way of learning the subject.»
- Nice teachers really implicated and helping, excellent climate, »
- It would have been good so have Mr Ottos lecture before the presentations but I realise he did not have time :)»
- We had comunication problems due to language difficulties. Also the difference in knowledge of methods and software differed very much, making the work more difficult and take more time.»
- I wish we had more courses on this subject. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från