ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Industrial design engineering - theory and methodology (2009), PPU090

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-10-21 - 2009-11-02
Antal svar: 29
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 64%
Kontaktperson: Oskar Rexfelt»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

29 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 10%
Around 20 hours/week»9 31%
Around 25 hours/week»10 34%
Around 30 hours/week»6 20%
At least 35 hours/week»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- Varied a lot, depending on if there was an assignment that week or not.» (Around 25 hours/week)
- mindre än utsatt/vecka, men pga av framskjutningen så blev det fler timmar totalt. » (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

29 svarande

0%»1 3%
25%»1 3%
50%»2 6%
75%»7 24%
100%»18 62%

Genomsnitt: 4.37

- I would say 85%. » (75%)
- missed 2» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

29 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 13%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 3%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»13 44%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»11 37%

Genomsnitt: 3.06

- teori biten, den sista uppgiften var lite diffus...» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

25 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»25 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- ok men lärarna kunde snackat lite bättre emellan sig, då en annan kurs tog upp lite mer tid...» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

26 svarande

No, not at all»3 11%
To some extent»6 23%
Yes, definitely»8 30%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»9 34%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

- We havn"t seen any of our papers that we handed in during the course. Which had been useful for the final assignment. » (No, not at all)
- No feedback was given back» (To some extent)
- Still waiting to get the reports back, don"t know if I passed or flunked.» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

29 svarande

Small extent»4 13%
Some extent»9 31%
Large extent»14 48%
Great extent»2 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.48

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

29 svarande

Small extent»2 6%
Some extent»7 24%
Large extent»16 55%
Great extent»4 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- Second assignment was hard due to the difficulty of finding relevant texts.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

28 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»14 50%
Very well»14 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- synd att vi itne fick tillbaka assignment 1,2 i tid.» (Rather well)
- Except for getting the reports back» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

28 svarande

Very poor»1 3%
Rather poor»1 3%
Rather good»13 46%
Very good»12 42%
I did not seek help»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 3.39

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

29 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»3 10%
Rather well»12 41%
Very well»14 48%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- Det blir lite segt när man ska skriva rapport och vissa grupper i klassen inte är helt hemma på engelska samt inte använt metoder för fem öre... och dessutom aldrig refererat någon gång till någonting... och skriver allt i olika tempusform och i punktform...» (Rather poorly)
- It"s hard to write together, it always gets bad.» (Rather poorly)
- Difficulties with the foreign students, concearning the writing in english again as this was a very theoretical course with a lot of hand-ins in written english. Good concerning discussions and so forth...» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

29 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 3%
Adequate»16 55%
High»12 41%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- A lot to do in the geginning and in the end. Low workload in the middle.» (Adequate)
- A bit spiky, but acceptable.» (Adequate)
- kunde vart lite lite lägre, så man kunde andas ut mellan uppgifter» (High)
- the reading is tough.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

29 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»10 34%
High»11 37%
Too high»8 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.93

- Blame the other course, this was reasonable.» (High)
- atleast 10h/day inclusive the weekends » (Too high)
- The combination of two courses with large report hand ins resulted in a high workload during the whole period.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

29 svarande

Poor»3 10%
Fair»4 13%
Adequate»6 20%
Good»13 44%
Excellent»3 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.31

- To wide, should have been more focused. Almost like it was an intro to post-graduate (doctoral) studying. I fail to see where I, in my worklife, will be able apply most of what have been taught.» (Poor)
- Meningless repetition » (Poor)
- Boring but usefull» (Adequate)
- I dont know if it ever will be implemented for me, but nothing is in vain.» (Adequate)
- Nice to get some practise on writing reports. But I still don"t feel too comfy with english.» (Good)
- Man kunde ha skippat teorierna och kört mer metoder... tror att jag har mer nytta av det. Dock så kanske teorierna är till för folk som ska forska... inget illa menat men det lär bara vara en per klass som gör det... » (Good)
- very interesting course, but the workload was high and I feel I didn"t have time to spend as much time as I would have wanted. » (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- no»
- The first lesson of team design work»
- Really nice that you made mixed groups at the beginning, makes people in the class know each other a bit.»
- In-depth study of certain methods.»
- learning about different theories in design»
- assignment 1a»
- The plan work consistency »
- -»
- The poster assignment. It was a nice break from the other ones. »
- Interesting course. MariAnn as a teacher gives the subject a high knowledge base.»
- The assignments have been sometimes difficult, but rewarding and useful for the future.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- i think tutors could give their lectures with more project based work with the methodology and thesis, it is better to understand and remember»
- Some feedback on the reports, if it"s just "you didn"t fail, getting back to the grades later"»
- Many lectures seemed pointless.»
- boring researchers for assignments»
- se över teori biten! helt klart för mycket filosofiskt lull lull»
- none.»
- Some feedback will be reasonable good»
- personally,because my English is not that good, i hope teacher can handout their PPT slides before their lectures not after.a prepare time is perfect for me»
- -»
- The returning of assignments within the study period! Now there was no possible way to change anything about your writing, thus learn anything, because we didn"t get any feedback. »
- Feedback. I did not recieve any feedback from the four different parts of the subject at any time during the course, even if promised. I would have liked to know what to improve etc.»
- We absolutely need to get respons on out work and assignments during the course and not after. This has made it impossible for me to realize the faults I am making when writing academic papers etcetera and consequently I will not learn as much as I would have wanted, or as much as I had expected when the course started. »

16. Additional comments

- no»
- The whole course seemed rather pointless, at least if you have an adequate background when enrolling on the masters program.»
- I think we should learn theories and methods more actively. We should learn how to use them or how they really are in the actual world and design. The course also needs more group work to learn different aspects in my point of view.»
- fixa schemat... på hemsidan samt på timeEdit tack! Annars trevlig kurs»
- If there are more books available, it will be very helpful.»
- We did not receive feedback on the work we handed in during the course, even though it was told to us that we should have. »
- None»
- -»
- When no assignments were returned, the hand-in dates felt a bit forced. Why hand in more stuff, when nothing is returned or printed as promised? Tough work load when this course went parallel with Visual Brand Identity. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från