Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Physical Ergonomics (2009), PPU120

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-10-21 - 2009-11-02
Antal svar: 9
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 69%
Kontaktperson: Oskar Rexfelt»
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Teknisk design 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

9 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 11%
Around 20 hours/week»5 55%
Around 25 hours/week»3 33%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.22

- we worked 3 days per week and discussion.» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

9 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 33%
100%»6 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.66

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

9 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 33%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»6 66%

Genomsnitt: 3

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

7 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»7 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

8 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 12%
Yes, definitely»6 75%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 33%
Large extent»6 66%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- The major part was learnt during individual studies within the project.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»5 55%
Great extent»4 44%

Genomsnitt: 3.44

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

9 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»5 55%
Very well»4 44%

Genomsnitt: 3.44

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

9 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 22%
Very good»7 77%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

9 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 11%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»8 88%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

- Was grouped for project work with a student who barely worked at all. Cooperation with other students was fine.» (Rather poorly)

11. How was the course workload?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 77%
High»2 22%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

- Though, the course was uneavenly distributed over the period since the first presentation came so late in the course. Usually you are supposed to have done the parts in the project, that are included in that presentation, but in this case the remaining part were much bigger and should probably have been started before the first presentation. We did not understand that. » (Adequate)
- Though, it was not clear that the project was supposed to be started up right away. Because of the other hand-ins the planning was done due to the deadlines of them, when these deadlines were posponed, also the start of the project work became posponed and the time was spent on the hand-in task instead. » (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 55%
High»4 44%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.44

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 11%
Good»7 77%
Excellent»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 4

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the lecture from the ergonomist»
- The project form and the open and free climate where it is easy to ask question and to customize the course after ones own field of interest.»
- the paper about what we need to do in our project which is handed out in the first class, it is clear and useful for project work.»
- the project part really give a good experience to us of how ergonomics works in daily life»
- Bra att det inte överlappar med grundkursen. »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- I don"t see the purpose of writing a summarized article. I can"t relate that task to the purpose of the course or the goals.»
- More clear how one can do things, for instance with the antropometry. We were suppose to do calculations but didnt know how, when we asked how we didnt get a proper answer. »
- The first presentation should be as early in time, as it is in workload»
- the deeper therotical study part could not take too long time»
- För mycket tid läggs på instuderingsfrågor och fördjupningsanatomi istället för att koncentrera arbetet på metoderna deras implementering i produktutveckling»

16. Additional comments

- overall a good course»
- It should be clearer that the structure of the course is a bit different than other courses in the sense that there is much more focus on the methods and the use of them. Also, it would be good to point out that the students are expected to start with the project right away even if there are other hand-ins at the same time. »
- I like this course, very interseting»

Kursutvärderingssystem från