ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Sustainable building - Competition A, ARK 350

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-10-21 - 2009-10-28
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 45%
Kontaktperson: Michael Edén»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Arkitektur 300 hp

Goals and fullfilment of goals

The learning outcomes are given in the course programme, that is the knowledge, understanding, skills and perspectives you are expectd to reach. Notify for each outcome how well they have been fulfilled.

1. Learning outcome 1

- to design sustainable architecture

11 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»5 50%
Sufficient»5 50%
Excellent»0 0%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- We have not enough lectures in sustainable building» (Insufficient)
- Have more lectures about sustainability» (Insufficient)

2. Learning outcome 2

- to describe and analyse the basic features in sustainable building

11 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»4 36%
Sufficient»6 54%
Excellent»1 9%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.72

- We have not get enough lectures in sustainable building» (Insufficient)

3. Learning outcome 3

- to design systems for good indoor climate and energy efficiency

11 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»6 60%
Sufficient»3 30%
Excellent»1 10%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- Knowledge since before,we have not learnt so much new.» (Sufficient)
- Have a good engineer that inform you » (Sufficient)

4. Learning outcome 4

- to synthesize programme issues into a competition entry

11 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»3 27%
Sufficient»7 63%
Excellent»1 9%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.81

5. 5 Learning outcome 5

- to visualize the performance concerning energy, environment and indoor climate in a building

11 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»2 18%
Sufficient»9 81%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

6. 6 Learning outcome 6

- to cooperate across disciplinary boundaries in design processes.

11 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»1 9%
Sufficient»7 63%
Excellent»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

- More information about how to organize the design process» (Insufficient)

7. 7 Learning outcome 7

- to use competitions as means for reflection and professional development

11 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»1 9%
Sufficient»6 54%
Excellent»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

8. Are the aims and goals reasonable in relation to your pre-knowledge ?

11 svarande

No, the goals are to elementary»2 28%
Yes, the goals are reasonable»5 71%
No, the goals are too ambitious»0 0%
No opinion»4

Genomsnitt: 1.71

9. Are the goals reasonable in relation to the scope and amount of credits?

11 svarande

Too small scope in relation to credits»0 0%
Reasonable scope in relation to credits»8 80%
Too wide scope in relation to credits»2 20%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.2

- The course have not finished yet so it is a bit difficult to answer all the questions especially the ones about designing sustainable architecture.» (No opinion)

Education and course administration

10. What support have you got for your learning from course literature and other material?

11 svarande

Very little»3 30%
Rather little»4 40%
Rather big»3 30%
Very big»0 0%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2

- Lack of lectures in this course, I expected plenty more information about sustainable building.» (Very little)

11. How did the organisation, memoranda, direct information etc. function?

11 svarande

Very bad»1 10%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather well»6 60%
Very well»3 30%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.1

- E-mail in last second and some use of the course homepage» (Very bad)
- Well for the studio, but not so well together with optional courses. » (Rather well)
- bästa jag varit med om på A» (Very well)

Work environment

12. How do you rate the possibilities to get assistance and ask questions?

11 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»2 18%
Rather well»3 27%
Very well»6 54%
I have not asked for assistance»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- Is hard to continued a design process if you are not inspired from the assistance to create a good solution to your project » (Rather bad)

13. How has the cooperation between you and students in your group been?

You have been working in different formations, try to give a general answer

11 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»9 81%
Very good»2 18%
I have not tried to cooperate»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

- Everyone tries to communicate and do a good project but sometimes is hard to cooperate to the same goal » (Rather good)

14. How did the team formation for the competition function?

10 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»3 30%
Rather good»5 50%
Very good»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- it worked ok» (?)
- Since it wasn"t organised, it was hard for people who didn"t really know anybody previously, to form a group. The ones that knew each other, formed groups and then the "left over" students were more or less forced together.» (Rather bad)

15. "laborations" . did they work?

The circumstances were a little bit varying. "Research by design" gave us trouble, the Louisiana exhibition was a bonus. So perhaps this question is mostly related to Lab 2

11 svarande

Very little»0 0%
Rather little»5 45%
Rather good»4 36%
Very well»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

- The lab 2 could have had better instructions, what was the aim?» (Rather little)
- presentationsteknik kanske är bra för ingenjörerna men jag känner att det hade gett mer att labba mer specifikt på hur man designar klimatsystem etc. LÄra av betancour?» (Rather little)
- Maybe lab 2 was a bit out of the subject, but it was a very good opportunity to learn to cooperate between architects and engineers» (Very well)

16. Group work site analysis

concerns the cooperation with Norwegian students on the site and the presentation

10 svarande

Very bad»1 10%
Rather bad»2 20%
Rather good»4 40%
Excellent»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- I was sick during that exercise. » (?)
- But you hade to little time because we had to plan a party aswell» (Rather good)

17. Launching of the competition

concerns the lecture at Älvrummet, the lecture on Friday

11 svarande

Very bad»2 18%
Rather bad»2 18%
Rather good»5 45%
Excellent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.63

- Swenglish on powerpoints... didn"t feel like they had prepared enough. very bad first impression of the client» (Very bad)
- The people from Älvstranden did not give a good impression. Sometimes it seemed like they did not know what they were talking about. (especially about the technical information)» (Rather bad)
- Really bad presentations with lots of misspellings and not so interesting content. Not to mention that it was badly organised, since there was an other presentation going on in the larger room next to us, so we couldn"t actually hear our own.» (Rather bad)

Concluding questions

18. The competition programme

So far, what is your opinion of the competition task?

11 svarande

Very bad»1 9%
Rather bad»3 27%
Rather good»5 45%
Excellent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

- To open and large task» (Very bad)
- It is difficult enough to design a sustainable building on this site, but to also have to decide on a program for the building is just too much.» (Rather bad)
- The program is too vague. The site is huge and the scope is very big but also very interesting.» (Rather bad)
- Jag tycker att onödigt stor tid går till programformulering, det hade varit bättre om detta varit mer specat och man kunde ägna mer tid åt design med ingenjörerna. nu blir det mycket arkitektjobb med program i början...» (Rather bad)

19. What is your overall opinion of the course?

11 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Passed»4 36%
Good»6 54%
Very good»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

- But of course it could be better. Maybe a seminar where u read texts about sustainable development and discuss.» (Good)
- The idea of architecs and engineers working in team is as close as to the "real world" you can get. We soon figure out by ourselves that we have to be humble and listnen to each other to make progress in the project. If you only do your own thing, nothing works very well. Its good to try yhis out now before we go into combat-field.» (Very good)

20. What should be preserved next year?

- The small group works in the beginning of the course, but the number of them should be decreased so we get more time for learning.»
- The layout for the project. The scale of the project. »
- The graphic representation lab but it would be helpful to have a presentation of good and bad examples and why they were good or bad.»
- More lecture about design process and sustainebility in a urban context»

21. What should be changed the nest year?

- More lectures about sustainable building. And a better introduction week for the engineers.»
- You form the groups, like in real life you dont have the power tho choose who you like to work with.»
- Information flow should be better. Better information on schedules, earlier»
- lab 2, explain the aim»

22. Other comments

- The organisation in general is really poor. The schedule is not coordinated between the studio and the courses we have, which becomes a big problem, especially when we have to work with students from other courses and disciplines. It shouldn"t be that hard to create a schedule with modules, that would work for everyone, regardless of which courses they are taking.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från