Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

TEK 195 - Manufacturing Strategy 2009/2010

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-10-09 - 2009-10-21
Antal svar: 20
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 32%
Kontaktperson: Maximilian Pasche»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

19 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»6 31%
Around 20 hours/week»6 31%
Around 25 hours/week»5 26%
Around 30 hours/week»2 10%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.15

- more at the end as usual» (Around 25 hours/week)
- Since Charmer"s work in a group everywhere...it is good to work in a team in the weekdays, when lectures are not there..So lot of time is available for working in a individual subject as per the group planning...» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

19 svarande

0%»1 5%
25%»2 10%
50%»2 10%
75%»10 52%
100%»4 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.73

- Collided with another course.» (0%)
- Some lecturers go in deep and they explain with the industry examples, so at that time the lecture will be so interesting to listen and some of the times it will be very hard to listen when there is no examples...» (75%)
- Because of overlap with other course some lectures were missed.» (75%)
- To follow the lectures it"s better if we have the slides to make notes in them.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

19 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 10%
The goals are difficult to understand»2 10%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»8 42%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

- No comments» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

18 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»16 88%
No, the goals are set too high»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.11

- No comments» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

Teaching and course administration

5. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»2 10%
Some extent»9 45%
Large extent»7 35%
Great extent»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.45

- The cases has been quite good examples, but to try to have a discussion in these big classes doesn"t work. » (Some extent)
- No comments» (Great extent)

6. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

19 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 26%
Large extent»12 63%
Great extent»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.84

- No comments» (Large extent)
- Reading instructions for the text book had been a big help.» (Large extent)

7. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

19 svarande

Very badly»2 10%
Rather badly»7 36%
Rather well»7 36%
Very well»3 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

- To much lectures last week (6 of 16). THe course need an better structure. » (Very badly)
- First the handouts wasn"t there in time, then infrmation was posted as a document instead of a note under "News". This makes it hard to find information when there are changes. The group formation should have been done with help from the web page (as all other courses are doing). Now it was time consuming.» (Rather badly)
- I think the still slides of the last lecture are still missing - only three day before the exam...» (Rather well)
- No comments» (Very well)

Study climate

8. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

19 svarande

Very poor»1 5%
Rather poor»3 15%
Rather good»5 26%
Very good»6 31%
I did not seek help»4 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.47

- No comments» (Very good)

9. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

19 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 5%
Rather well»4 21%
Very well»14 73%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

- No comments» (Very well)

10. How was the course workload?

19 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»15 78%
High»4 21%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

- But very uneven. It would have been MUCH better to have more lectures in the beginnin of the course, not at the end! Almost 2 weeks went by without any lectures or specific information about starting the group assignment.» (Adequate)
- No comments» (Adequate)
- Very low in the beginning, to high in the end!» (Adequate)
- Why put all the workload at the end of the period??? Intensify the beginning, 2-3 weeks, with alot of lectures and let the project run free for the last part. TOO SLOW PACE!!» (Adequate)
- bad lecture planning. To few in beginning. And 12 hours of lectures last week..» (Adequate)

11. How was the total workload this study period?

19 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 10%
Adequate»8 42%
High»8 42%
Too high»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- No comments» (Adequate)
- High due to extremely unintelligent distribution of the workload!» (High)
- I have taken 3 courses => high workload» (High)

Summarizing questions

12. What is your general impression of the course?

20 svarande

Poor»1 5%
Fair»5 25%
Adequate»9 45%
Good»3 15%
Excellent»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 3

- I did not like the content as much as I thought before...» (Fair)
- Could be focused more on manufacturing. Saying it is manufacturing is a bit misleading.» (Fair)
- Interestin subject. Messy structure and execution.» (Adequate)
- It is really useful for the people who are going to work in any manufacturing sector..For me it is really good to learn this subjects as i worked in manufacturing company for two years..» (Excellent)

13. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The video-cases. It is much easier to understand the course material when seeing it in realtion to reality.»
- I recommend you to follow the same thing which is running as of now...»
- Keep bringing different lecturers to explain each part of the Manufacturing Strategy»
- - course structure (ratio normal study to project) - course goals»
- The case studies during the lessons»
- the group work is really usefull»
- The project is oki»
- I liked the fact that there were so many different teachers.»
- Group work among different nationalities.»

14. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Give more information about the case/project. It"s very vague what we are supposed to do.»
- Further englishpractice for some of the teachers to improve the outcome of the lectures »
- More lectures in the beginning of the period, we need knowledge to be able to do the group assignment! Now we get this information when we are almost finished...»
- Nothing to be changed, but just add lean manufacturing in the course »
- The book Operation strategy is good, but it takes to long to explain simple things. Sometimes you feel like too much reading for few information flowing.»
- - the book (too many content without clear facts) »
- Please upload the power point slides BEFORE each lesson.»
- the lectures should be done earlier leaving the students the chance to have all the knowledge in order to do a better work on the project»
- Have the slides before the lecture»
- Begin the period with a flying start, don"t lag until the end »
- Give clear guidelins for the project, make people start on it earlier, talk about the different tools you want people to use in the project early on inte the course. »
- Better stucture of the course, more lecture in the start.»
- The slides were really old, some of them even had an old date on it!!! Furthermore the slides and the course outline were based on the old book. So, perhaps everything should be updated!!!»
- Greater focus on manufacturing companies, more cases with this kind of companies.»
- No presentations in the exam week!»
- Factory tour or some activity to feel the operations of companies directly could be incruded. According to course introduction on the web page, it was contained, but we din not do it. We can do it by ourselves in the extension of team project, but it"s not easy to contact some company individually as a student.»

15. Additional comments

- No comments»
- I like the course and I think that is a great idea to keep bringing real live examples so it makes interesting the course.»
- The introduced literature was not completely comprehensible.It was not written in a native English language and sometimes,it was really hard to understand what the writers mean. »
- None»
- We did not have any lectures week 2 or 3, none what so ever, I feel that the entire course was very badly planned and this is something that needs to be improved untill next year.»
- The lectures were mainly only about the stuff which was already in the book. So perhaps, there should be something new»

Kursutvärderingssystem från