|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
2009/2010 Programming for science, DAT160Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2009-10-08 - 2009-11-01 Antal svar: 6 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?% Kontaktperson: Graham Kemp»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.33 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.16 - Some of the computer lab classes I skipped because I work better at my own computer at home. Still very nice to come to the labs when I had questions. » (75%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.33 - It would be nice if you mention that projects on unix are focusing on text file manupulation, and on Java are foucsing on writing Graphical application, even though lectures cover syllabus enoughly.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.5 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.8 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?5 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - Especially the labs are very important.» (Large extent) 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.83 - In the unix part we didn"t have any course course book and the slides did not help much at all. In the Java part on the other hand they were of great help.» (Some extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.33 - Some items of the website is not accessible from home, only from Chalmers.» (Rather well) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.83 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.66 11. How was the course workload?6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.33 12. How was the total workload this study period?6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.33 Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 - The course covers a basic part of object oriented programming in Java, but we are expecting more advanced content like data structures and algorithms» (Adequate) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The computer lab time. That is the single most important thing in this course. Also, the Unix part is really good, even for a part-time Linux user.»- Yes,definitely» - unix part is really helpful. there is no such course in chalmers that we can learn such things.» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- There is nothing that really HAS to change to next year. Overall, this is a really good course.»- not much necessary» - I believe it"s hard to write complete programs on paper during the exam, even if we have supporting materials. Without working with a compiler it"s hard to debug the code on paper, because that"s how programming supposed to be. I think the better to evaluate what people have learn in the course is to ask people to write pieces of code or even pseudocode to test their understanding of algorithms and the features of the language or objected oriented programming. Exact syntax and complete program structure should not be so important when they are written on papers. Another approach maybe to distribute the evaluation during the study period, in which we could have heavier workload for the assignment by giving extra tasks by completing which students are granted by bonus points benefiting their final exam. That would be a good way to motivate people work harder during the course, instead of spend time on preparing for a paper based programming exam. Because learning by doing real programming tasks is the best way of learning how to program.» - The exam did have a too short time span in considerations to the questions. Either give us more time or do a bit shorter questions. Also unix part needs a book. It is currently too dependent on that you attend lessons and if you miss a lecture or if they clash you have a very hard time to catch up. » 16. Additional comments- It will be better if teacher can give some advise to further the programming study after finishing the course.»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16%