|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
FFR160 Sustainable development H09, FFR160Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2009-10-14 - 2009-11-02 Antal svar: 31 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 30% Kontaktperson: Kathrine Jahnberg»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.35 - Reading the course litterature takes a hole lot of time. There are many long articles. » (Around 20 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.35 - If it had been possible I would have attended every lecture, they were great. However, I took another course with plenty of manditory seminars and therefore I misses some lectures in this course.» (50%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.7 - I have not read the goals. I don"t think it is because they were hard do find.» (I have not seen/read the goals) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.95 - How come the sustainable consumption were left out? How come nothing were mentioned concerning CO2 from transport? And why there so big emphasis on enviromental assesment tools?» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.16 - knowledgable, willing to help and explain» (Large extent) 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.35 - the booklet was good but the compendium was useless» (Small extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.48 - Most lectures´, slides were not uploaded.» (Very badly) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.03 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.67 11. How was the course workload?30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - High when it comes to the litterature. Reading takes up a lot of the time. » (Adequate) 12. How was the total workload this study period?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.19 Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.03 - Interesting that many people from many different areas came to speak-BUT then that lead to that many things was said several times.» (Adequate) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The guest lectures, "working for sustainability".»- The two first seminars were gr8! Learned alot. » - The lectures are worth so much. No change in them ar required. » - Guest lectures, they gave many interesting perspectives.» - Different lucturers so we get differnt thought about the subject» - Guest lecturers» - Lectures, seminars, guest lecturers» - The guest lectures, were really good and intersting. » - the guest lectures were realy intresting.» - The course set-up with the included topics, seminars, and interesting guest lectures. » - conference, provide different point of view, very enriching» - Students coordination and class debate on issues presented in lectures.» - The guest lectures» - All interesting lectures and inspiring lecturers!» - seminars» - The seminars» - Guest lecturers. Seminars.» - The hand ins content» - guestlectures!» - The gest lecturers were awesome.» - The guest lectures and seminars 1 and 2, but the seminar handins were to extensive.» - The seminars are a good way to implicate the student.» - The first seminar. Many very good lectures. » 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Many lecturers are saying the same thing instead of teaching us new stuff. (e.g. the climate issue graphs)»- groups for seminars should be divided into 8.» - The third seminar had some good points but they were painfully boring.» - The seminars, us student want to know ahead what is expected by us during the seminar and what is going to happend during the seminar. » - The timeconsuming calculations before seminar 2» - preparation of seminar 2, to much calculations.» - The exam should not be written, should be oral, in my opinion.» - Please make the enviromental assesment tools lecture better, it was way too long, hard to understand, no red line to follow.» - They should have more time to prepair for the seminars.» - Seminar 2 meant a lot of time spent on calculations that did not really contribute to learning the course content. » - Better sminar tasks» - Some lectures contained 80 slides and that is too much to take in. Better with few slides and more time on each.» - The litteratures» - It would be good if the teachers had time to talk to each other so that they don"t talk about the same thing. It was a lot of things that were brought up lecture after lecture which is kind a sad in a topic that is this interesting and huge.» - The seminars. Now it was repetative and alittle bit of waist of time. We discussed the same things as we allready had done writing it. Msybe if you get points on the exame people would give more and learn more» - Spread out the guestlectures.» - I think the seminars should be longer, it seems like sometimes time was not enough to discuss all the necessary issues.» - Seminar 3 was not very fulfilling.» - All graphs and statistics shown during lectures should be presented with source and year. Feedback should be given too preparatory tasks for seminars, it should be possible to "fail". Otherwize too little effort is often put on them. I did not personally like the presentation of solutions to seminar 2 on the webpage, were ther no other person who could have assisted with answering queations? » 16. Additional comments- I think that this course examination should not be a written exam. I think it would be better that the examination could be the semenaire task, since sustainable development is a complex subject, it"s not right to make a written exam.»- As a hole the course went very well and was managed very well.» - Some articles were very hard to read.»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16%